RPLND is technically feasible by a purely transoral robotic approach. Its performance is not associated with worse swallowing outcomes or rates of complication. In select patients, RPLND may provide valuable staging information and guide the selection of adjuvant therapy.
Objective To describe the utility of venous flow couplers in monitoring free tissue flaps in the immediate postoperative setting. Study Design Retrospective case series. Setting Otolaryngology department at a single tertiary care institution. Methods A retrospective case series of free flap reconstructions in which venous flow couplers were employed to supplement flap monitoring. All free flap cases performed over the past 4 years were reviewed. Inclusion criteria were venous flow coupler and arterial flow Doppler monitored for 5 days postoperatively. Results From July 2014 through May 2018, the venous flow coupler was used with the arterial flow Doppler and clinical monitoring in 228 cases. Eleven cases did not meet criteria for inclusion; thus, 217 cases were analyzed. Twenty cases (9.2%) returned to the operating room with concern for flap compromise, and 16 were salvaged. The combination of venous flow coupler and arterial flow Doppler identified 19 of these flaps. Venous flow couplers identified 5 compromised flaps before there was an arterial signal change, and all were salvaged. Additionally, there was a 24.1% false-positive rate when 2 venous flow couplers were used in parallel. For the venous flow coupler, the positive predictive value was 64.3% and the negative predictive value, 98.9%. The false-positive rate in the series was 5.1%. The sensitivity was 90% and the specificity, 94.9%. Conclusion The venous flow coupler is able to detect venous thrombosis in the absence of arterial thrombosis and may contribute to improved flap salvage rates.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.