Online social networks (ONSs) such as Twitter have grown to be very useful tools for the dissemination of information. However, they have also become a fertile ground for the spread of false information, particularly regarding the ongoing coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic. Best described as an infodemic, there is a great need, now more than ever, for scientific fact-checking and misinformation detection regarding the dangers posed by these tools with regards to COVID-19. In this paper, we analyze the credibility of information shared on Twitter pertaining the COVID-19 pandemic. For our analysis, we propose an ensemble-learning-based framework for verifying the credibility of a vast number of tweets. In particular, we carry out analyses of a large dataset of tweets conveying information regarding COVID-19. In our approach, we classify the information into two categories: credible or noncredible. Our classifications of tweet credibility are based on various features, including tweet-and userlevel features. We conduct multiple experiments on the collected and labeled dataset. The results obtained with the proposed framework reveal high accuracy in detecting credible and non-credible tweets containing COVID-19 information.
Summary This paper addresses the problem of finding credible sources among Twitter social network users to detect and prevent various malicious activities, such as spreading false information on a potentially inflammatory topic, forging accounts for false identities, etc. Existing research works related to source credibility are graph‐based, considering the relationships among users to predict the spread information; human‐based, using human perspectives to determine reliable sources; or machine learning‐based, relying on training classifiers to predict users' credibility. Very few of these approaches consider a user's sentimentality when analyzing his/her credibility as a source. In this paper, we propose a novel approach that combines analysis of the user's reputation on a given topic within the social network, as well as a measure of the user's sentiment to identify topically relevant and credible sources of information. In particular, we propose a new reputation metric that introduces several new features into the existing models. We evaluated the performance of the proposed metric in comparison with two machine learning techniques, determining that the accuracy of the proposed approach satisfies the stated purpose of identifying credible Twitter users. Copyright © 2016 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
The alarmingly high mortality rate and increasing global prevalence of cardiovascular diseases (CVDs) signify the crucial need for early detection schemes. Phonocardiogram (PCG) signals have been historically applied in this domain owing to its simplicity and cost-effectiveness. In this paper, we propose CardioXNet, a novel lightweight end-to-end CRNN architecture for automatic detection of five classes of cardiac auscultation namely normal, aortic stenosis, mitral stenosis, mitral regurgitation and mitral valve prolapse using raw PCG signal. The process has been automated by the involvement of two learning phases namely, representation learning and sequence residual learning. Three parallel CNN pathways have been implemented in the representation learning phase to learn the coarse and fine-grained features from the PCG and to explore the salient features from variable receptive fields involving 2D-CNN based squeeze-expansion. Thus, in the representation learning phase, the network extracts efficient timeinvariant features and converges with great rapidity. In the sequential residual learning phase, because of the bidirectional-LSTMs and the skip connection, the network can proficiently extract temporal features without performing any feature extraction on the signal. The obtained results demonstrate that the proposed end-toend architecture yields outstanding performance in all the evaluation metrics compared to the previous stateof-the-art methods with up to 99.60% accuracy, 99.56% precision, 99.52% recall and 99.68% F1-score on an average while being computationally comparable. This model outperforms any previous works using the same database by a considerable margin. Moreover, the proposed model was tested on PhysioNet/CinC 2016 challenge dataset achieving an accuracy of 86.57%. Finally the model was evaluated on a merged dataset of Github PCG dataset and PhysioNet dataset achieving excellent accuracy of 88.09%. The high accuracy metrics on both primary and secondary dataset combined with a significantly low number of parameters and end-to-end prediction approach makes the proposed network especially suitable for point of care CVD screening in low resource setups using memory constraint mobile devices.
The importance of information credibility in society cannot be underestimated given that it is at the heart of all decision-making. Generally, more information is better; however, knowing the value of this information is essential for the decision-making processes. Information credibility defines a measure of the fitness of the information for consumption. It can also be defined in terms of reliability, which denotes the probability that a data source will appear credible to the users. A challenge in this topic is that there is a great deal of literature that has developed different credibility dimensions. In addition, information science dealing with online social networks has grown in complexity, attracting interest from researchers in information science, psychology, human-computer interaction, communication studies, and management studies, all of whom have studied the topic from different perspectives. This work will attempt to provide an overall review of the credibility assessment literature over the period 2006-2017 as applied to the context of the microblogging platform, Twitter. The known interpretations of credibility will be examined, particularly as they relate to the Twitter environment. In addition, we investigate levels of credibility assessment features. We then discuss recent works, addressing a new taxonomy of credibility analysis and assessment techniques. At last, a cross-referencing of literature is performed while suggesting new topics for future studies of credibility assessment in a social media context.
Since the purchase of Siri by Apple, and its release with the iPhone 4S in 2011, virtual assistants (VAs) have grown in number and popularity. The sophisticated natural language processing and speech recognition employed by VAs enables users to interact with them conversationally, almost as they would with another human. To service user voice requests, VAs transmit large amounts of data to their vendors; these data are processed and stored in the Cloud. The potential data security and privacy issues involved in this process provided the motivation to examine the current state of the art in VA research. In this study, we identify peer-reviewed literature that focuses on security and privacy concerns surrounding these assistants, including current trends in addressing how voice assistants are vulnerable to malicious attacks and worries that the VA is recording without the user’s knowledge or consent. The findings show that not only are these worries manifold, but there is a gap in the current state of the art, and no current literature reviews on the topic exist. This review sheds light on future research directions, such as providing solutions to perform voice authentication without an external device, and the compliance of VAs with privacy regulations.
Cervical cancer growth is the fourth maximum of regular diseases in females. It is one of the sicknesses which is compromising ladies' wellbeing everywhere in the world and it is difficult to notice any sign in the beginning phase. But the screening process of cervical cancer sometimes is being hampered due to some social-behavioral factors. There is still a limited number of researches directed in cervical cancer identification dependent on the behavior and machine learning in the area of gynecology and computer science. In this research, we have proposed three machine learning models such as Decision Tree, Random Forest, and XGBoost to predict cervical cancer from behavior and its variables and we got significantly improved outcomes than the current methods with 93.33% accuracy. Moreover, we have shown the top features from the dataset according to the feature important scores to know their impacts on the development of the classification model.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
hi@scite.ai
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
Copyright © 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.