Objectives: To assess the impact of a preexposure prophylaxis (PrEP) programme for high-risk men who have sex with men (MSM), which includes gonorrhoea testing and treatment, on the transmission of HIV and Neisseria among MSM in the Netherlands and the cost-effectiveness of such programme with and without risk compensation (in the form of reduced condom use). Methods: We developed a stochastic agent-based transmission model of HIV and gonorrhoea. We simulated a capped (max 2.5% of MSM) and uncapped (5.5% of MSM in 2018 declining to 3% in 2027) daily PrEP programme for high-risk MSM, with 3-monthly HIV and gonorrhoea testing, with and without risk compensation. Epidemiological outcomes were calculated from the transmission model and used in an economic model to calculate costs, quality-adjusted life-years (QALY), and incremental cost-effectiveness ratios (ICER), over 2018–2027, taking a healthcare payer perspective. Results: Without risk compensation, PrEP can lead to a reduction of 61 or 49% in the total number of new HIV infections in 2018–2027, if the programme is uncapped or capped to 2.5% of MSM, respectively. With risk compensation, this reduction can be 63 or 46% in the uncapped and capped programmes, respectively. In all scenarios, gonorrhoea prevalence decreased after introducing PrEP. Without risk compensation, 92% of simulations were cost-effective (of which 52% cost-saving). With risk compensation, 73% of simulations were cost-effective (of which 23% was cost-saving). Conclusion: A nationwide PrEP programme for high-risk MSM can result in substantial reductions in HIV and gonorrhoea transmission and be cost-effective, even with risk compensation.

ObjectivesTo investigate the impact and efficiency of combined testing for HIV and other STIs on HIV and STI transmission among men who have sex with men (MSM) and to assess what subgroups of MSM should be targeted for frequent testing.MethodsWe developed an agent-based transmission model that simulates infection with HIV or Neisseria gonorrhoeae (NG) among MSM. We examined scenarios with increased percentages of MSM getting tested six monthly, among all MSM or only specific subgroups of MSM (defined according to recent gonorrhoea, number of partners and engagement in condomless anal intercourse (CAI)) and scenarios with reduced intervals between HIV/STI tests.ResultsThe most efficient strategies were those with increased percentage of MSM getting tested every 6 months among MSM with a recent gonorrhoea diagnosis; or among MSM who had CAI and ≥10 partners; or MSM who had ≥10 partners. Over 10 years, these strategies resulted in 387–718 averted HIV infections and required 29–164 additional HIV tests per averted HIV infection or one to seven additional gonorrhoea tests per averted NG infection. The most effective strategy in reducing HIV transmission was the one where the intervals between tests were reduced by half, followed by the strategy with increased percentage of MSM getting tested every 6 months among all MSM. Over 10 years, these strategies resulted in 1362 and 1319 averted HIV infections, but required 663 and 584 additional HIV tests per averted HIV infection, respectively.ConclusionsTargeting MSM with recent gonorrhoea diagnosis or MSM with many partners is efficient in terms of HIV/STI tests needed to prevent new HIV or NG infections. Major reductions in HIV incidence can be achieved with consistent HIV/STI testing every 6 months among larger groups, including low-risk MSM. To impede HIV transmission, frequent testing should be combined with other prevention measures.

No abstract

van der Loeff d,e , Maria Prins d,e , Elske Hoornenborg d,f , on behalf of the Amsterdam PrEP Project Team in the HIV Transmission Elimination Amsterdam (H-TEAM) InitiativeObjectives: To assess the cost-effectiveness of a preexposure prophylaxis (PrEP) programme offering a choice of daily and event-driven PrEP for men who have sex with men (MSM) in the Netherlands. Methods:We used an agent-based transmission model and an economic model to simulate a programme offering only daily PrEP and a programme offering daily and event-driven PrEP. Use of PrEP medication and preference for daily versus event-driven PrEP were estimated from the Amsterdam PrEP Demonstration Project (AMPrEP). We calculated costs, quality-adjusted life-years (QALY), and incremental cost-effectiveness ratios (ICER), over 2018-2027. An ICER less than s20 000 per QALY gained was considered cost-effective.Results: Using AMPrEP data, we estimated that 27% of PrEP users chose event-driven PrEP with a median of 12 pills per month; daily PrEP users used a median of 30 pills per month. With PrEP, 3740 HIV infections were averted and 1482 QALYs were gained over 2018-2027, compared to the scenario without PrEP. The probability of the PrEP programme being cost-effective (compared to not having a PrEP programme) increased from 91% with daily PrEP to 94% with a choice of daily and event-driven PrEP. The probability of being cost-saving increased from 42% with only daily PrEP to 48% with choice of daily and event-driven PrEP.