It is unclear whether cyclosporine A (CsA) can be withdrawn safely during follow-up after pediatric liver transplantation. In our transplant program we have been using a strict protocol to withdraw CsA. The aim of this study was to retrospectively assess the effects of CsA withdrawal after pediatric liver transplantation on the incidence of rejection and renal function. Between 1986 and 2001, 91 children received CsA for at least 2 yr after liver transplantation. Specific criteria for eligibility to withdraw CsA were set. In 53 of the 91 children CsA was withdrawn. In 35 patients (66%) withdrawal of CsA did not cause rejection. In these patients the renal function improved compared with baseline values (glomerular filtration rate (GFR) at 1 yr, ϩ16 mL/minute/1.73 m 3 , P Ͻ 0.001; at 2 yr, ϩ10 mL/minute/1.73 m 3 , P Ͻ 0.05). After CsA withdrawal, 18 patients developed rejection (34%), which could be effectively treated by methylprednisolone and restarting CsA. Failure to withdraw CsA was not associated with increased incidence of graft loss. A body weight below 10 kg at the time of transplantation correlated significantly with successful withdrawal of CsA (Ͻ10 kg, 85% vs. Ͼ 10 kg, 60%; P Ͻ 0.05). In conclusion CsA can successfully be withdrawn in a major proportion of selected pediatric liver transplantation patients during follow-up. The success rate is the highest in children with a body weight below 10 kg at the time of transplantation. Successful withdrawal improves renal function, whereas failure to withdraw is not associated with graft loss or persisting morbidity.
For the treatment of children with acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL), Dutch pediatric oncologists use the Dutch Childhood Oncology Group ALL 10 protocol. This protocol is complex, as it comprises many different drug regimens. One of the drugs is asparaginase which is available in different forms with different pharmacokinetics: Escherichia coli asparaginase, Erwinia asparaginase, and pegylated E. coli asparaginase [polyethylene glycol (PEG) asparaginase]. Here, we report the case of a 3-year-old patient treated with ALL who was 8 times erroneously treated with E. coli asparaginase instead of PEG asparaginase. As E. coli asparaginase was administered to the patient in the lower dosage regimen of PEG asparaginase, she was undertreated, but at the end of the treatment the patient was in complete remission. This case report describes the actual course of treatment, the reasons why it went wrong, and possible preventive measures.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
hi@scite.ai
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
Copyright © 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.