Octreotide LAR significantly lengthens time to tumor progression compared with placebo in patients with functionally active and inactive metastatic midgut NETs. Because of the low number of observed deaths, survival analysis was not confirmatory.

No abstract

In spite of the common cellular origin of these tumours, differences in growth factor receptor expression suggest the existence of different pathways during tumour subtype development.

Background: Somatostatin and its long-acting analogues are effective in symptom control in patients with functionally active neuroendocrine GEP tumours. Several in vitro and in vivo reports suggest that they are also able to control tumour growth. Methods: Critical review of published data on the effect of long-acting somatostatin analogues on symptom and growth control in patients with metastatic neuroendocrine GEP tumours. Results: With the exception of insulinoma and gastrinoma, octreotide acetate and other long-acting somatostatin formulations are currently the therapeutic principle of first choice to control hormone-mediated symptoms. The consequences of gastric acid hypersecretion in patients with Zollinger-Ellison syndrome are best controlled by proton pump inhibitors. Available data on growth control indicate that stabilization of tumour growth seems to be the most beneficial antiproliferative effect occurring in up to 50% of patients. This effect is limited. However, it is unknown which tumour entity responds best to long- acting somatostatin analogues. Conclusion: Additional studies in patients with known spontaneous tumour growth and avoiding a mix-up of different entities of neuroendocrine malignancies are necessary to identify subpopulations of neuroendocrine tumours which respond to long-acting somatostatin analogues in terms of longer lasting growth inhibition.

Background: In neuroendocrine tumors, metastases are a negative prognostic factor for survival and quality of life. Transcatheter arterial chemoembolization (TACE) is thought to be an effective symptomatic and antiproliferative treatment in patients with otherwise progressive disease. Methods: 62 chemoembolization procedures in 26 patients with progressive neuroendocrine tumors were reviewed. The underlying disease was carcinoid syndrome in 10, non-functional midgut tumor in 2, non-functional pancreatic tumor in 7, malignant insulinoma in 2 patients, non-functional tumor of the stomach in 1 and of unknown origin in 4 patients. Tumor burden of the liver was <25% in 3, 25–50% in 11, 50–75% in 6 and >75% in 6 patients. Results: TACE was technically successful in 57 cases. Four patients developed minor and 5 major complications. The 30-day mortality rate was 7.7%. According to WHO criteria, 14 patients had no change in tumor burden, 2 had regression and 5 progress after chemoembolization. Patients with a tumor burden >75% of the liver did not benefit from TACE due to the development of major complications, whereas patients with low (<50%) tumor burden and high (>50%) lipiodol uptake showed a trend towards longer survival. Five-year survival time after diagnosis was 48%. Patients treated with octreotide and/or α-interferon had no benefit from chemoembolization with regard to their carcinoid syndrome. Conclusions: In this retrospective study, patients with low (<50%) tumor burden and high (>50%) lipiodol uptake responded better to TACE than end-stage patients.