The study did not show significant sensorineural hearing loss at or below 3 kHz. Vestibular and cochlear function has no clinically relevant suppression after Er:YAG laser stapedotomy.

Background: Quality in health care can be evaluated using quality indicators (QIs). Elements contained in the surgical operative report are potential sources for QI data, but little is known about the completeness of the narrative operative report (NR). We evaluated the completeness of the NR for patients undergoing a pancreaticoduodenectomy. Methods:We reviewed NRs for patients undergoing a pancreaticoduodenectomy over a 1-year period. We extracted 79 variables related to patient and narrator characteristics, process of care measures, surgical technique and oncology-related outcomes by document analysis. Data were coded and evaluated for completeness. Results:We analyzed 74 NRs. The median number of variables reported was 43.5 (range 13-54). Variables related to surgical technique were most complete. Process of care and oncology-related variables were often omitted. Completeness of the NR was associated with longer operative duration. Conclusion:The NRs were often incomplete and of poor quality. Important elements, including process of care and oncology-related data, were frequently missing. Thus, the NR is an inadequate data source for QI. Development and use of alternative reporting methods, including standardized synoptic operative reports, should be encouraged to improve documentation of care and serve as a measure of quality of surgical care. Conclusion :Les NO sont souvent incomplètes et leur qualité laisse à désirer. Des éléments importants, dont le protocole opératoire et les données oncologiques, étaient souvent manquants. Ainsi, les NO constituent une source inadéquate de données en ce qui concerne les IQ. Il faudra encourager la mise au point et l'utilisation d'autres types de rapports, dont des synopsis opératoires standardisés, pour mieux documenter les soins chirurgicaux prodigués et pour en évaluer la qualité. Q uality improvement is an important component of health care systems. Quality in health care can be evaluated in terms of the structures, processes and outcomes of care.

BackgroundSurgery is a cornerstone of treatment for malignancy. However, significant variation has been reported in patterns and quality of cancer care for important health outcomes, including perioperative mortality. Surgical process improvement tools (SPITs) have been developed that focus on enhancing the processes of care at the point of care, as a means of quality improvement. This study describes SPITs and develops a conceptual framework by synthesizing the available literature on these novel quality improvement tools.MethodsA scoping review was conducted based on instruments developed for quality improvement in surgery. The search was executed on electronically indexed sources (MEDLINE, EMBASE, and the Cochrane library) from January 1990 to March 2011. Data were extracted, tabulated and reported thematically using a narrative synthesis approach. These results were used to develop a conceptual framework that describes and classifies SPITs.Results232 articles were reviewed for data extraction and analysis. SPITs identified were classified into 3 groups: clinical mapping tools, structure communication tools and error reduction instruments. The dominant instrument reported were clinical mapping tools, including: clinical pathways (113, 48%), fast track (46, 20%) and enhanced recovery after surgery protocols (36, 15%). Outcomes reported included: length of stay (174, 75%), readmission rates (116, 50%), morbidity (116, 50%), mortality (104, 45%), and economic (60, 26%). Many gaps in the literature were recognized.ConclusionWe have developed a conceptual framework of SPITs and identified gaps in current knowledge. These results will guide the design and development of new quality instruments in surgery.

No abstract

ObjectiveCentralization of medical services in Canada has resulted in patients travelling long distances for healthcare, which may compromise their health. We hypothesized that children living farther from a children’s hospital were offered and attended fewer follow-up appointments.MethodsWe reviewed children less than 17 years of age referred to the general surgery clinic at a tertiary children’s hospital during a 2-year period who underwent surgery. Descriptive statistics were performed.ResultsWe identified 723 patients. The majority were male (61%) with a median age of 7 years (range 18 days to16 years) and were from the major urban center (MUC) (56.3%). The median distance travelled to hospital for MUC patients was 8.9 km (range 0.9–22 km) vs 119.5 km (range 20.3–1950 km) for non-MUC patients. MUC children were offered more follow-up appointments (72.7% vs 60.8%, p<0.05). No significant differences existed in follow-up attendance rates (MUC 88.5% vs non-MUC 89.1%, p=0.84) or postoperative complications (9.8% vs 9.2%, p=0.78). There were no deaths.ConclusionsPatients living farther from a hospital were offered fewer follow-up appointments, but attended an equivalent rate of follow-ups when offered one. Telemedicine and remote follow-up are underused approaches that can permit follow-up appointments while reducing associated travel time and expenses.

Background: Surgery is a cornerstone of cancer treatment, but significant differences in the quality of surgery have been reported. Surgical process improvement tools (spits) modify the processes of care as a means to quality improvement (qi). We were interested in developing spits in the area of gastrointestinal (gi) cancer surgery. We report the recommendations of an expert panel held to define quality gaps and establish priority areas that would benefit from spits. Methods: The present study used the knowledge-to-action cycle was as a framework. Canadian experts in qi and in gi cancer surgery were assembled in a nominal group workshop. Participants evaluated the merits of spits, described gaps in current knowledge, and identified and ranked processes of care that would benefit from qi. A qualitative analysis of the workshop deliberations using modified grounded theory methods identified major themes. Results: The expert panel consisted of 22 participants. Experts confirmed that spits were an important strategy for qi. The top-rated spits included clinical pathways, electronic information technology, and patient safety tools. The preferred settings for use of spits included preoperative and intraoperative settings and multidisciplinary contexts. Outcomes of interest were cancer-related outcomes, process, and the technical quality of surgery measures. Conclusions: Surgical process improvement tools were confirmed as an important strategy. Expert panel recommendations will be used to guide future research efforts for spits in gi cancer surgery.

Bariatric patients are difficult to assess clinically for signs of postoperative complication. Diagnostic laparoscopy (DL) is used to investigate patients suspicious for complications such as anastomotic leak (AL) and intra-abdominal hemorrhage (IH). Most bariatric surgeons use DL in the presence of sustained tachycardia; however, the rate of this procedure and its clinical value have not been sufficiently investigated.A retrospective review of patients undergoing bariatric surgery from January 2010 to December 2011 was performed. Data from 4 collaborative bariatric centres of excellence were included in this analysis. From among all elective bariatric procedures, cases that required early reoperation were selected for further evaluation.A total of 1001 elective bariatric procedures were identified. Of these, 952 (95%) were primary bariatric procedures, including 866 (91%) Roux-en-Y gastric bypasses and 86 (9%) sleeve gastrectomies. The remaining 48 cases represented revisional proced ures. Of these, 11 patients (1.1%) returned to the operating room within 72 hours for DL: 64% were primary cases (n = 7) and 36% revisional cases (n = 4). Intraoperative findings included AL (45%, n = 5), IH (27%, n = 3), no pathology identified (18%, n = 2) and small bowel obstruction (9%, n = 1). Of the 9 patients with complications, all were tachycardic (heart rate > 100 beats/min), and 4 of the 5 patients with AL were febrile (t > 37.5). There were no reported adverse events directly related to the use of DL.Diagnostic laparoscopy is a useful and safe option for both the diagnosis and treatment of suspected complications after bariatric surgery. The majority of patients returning to operating room had significant findings, and all were treated laparoscopically. Persistent postoperative tachycardia or fever were highly predictive of positive findings during DL. An emphasis on early decisionmaking and expeditious return to the operating room for laparoscopy should be the standard for bariatric patients on clinical suspicion of a postoperative complication. 4Changes of active and total ghrelin, GLP-1 and PYY following restrictive bariatric surgery and their impact on satiety: comparison of sleeve gastrectomy and adjustable gastric banding. A

No abstract