Norway rats (Rattus norvegicus) are considered one of the most significant vertebrate pests globally, because of their impacts on human and animal health. There are legal and moral obligations to minimise the impacts of wildlife management on animal welfare, yet there are few data on the relative welfare impacts of rat trapping and baiting methods used in the UK with which to inform management decisions. Two stakeholder workshops were facilitated to assess the relative welfare impacts of six lethal rat management methods using a welfare assessment model. Fifteen stakeholders including experts in wildlife management, rodent management, rodent biology, animal welfare science, and veterinary science and medicine, participated. The greatest welfare impacts were associated with three baiting methods, anticoagulants, cholecalciferol and non-toxic cellulose baits (severe to extreme impact for days), and with capture on a glue trap (extreme for hours) with concussive killing (mild to moderate for seconds to minutes); these methods should be considered last resorts from a welfare perspective. Lower impacts were associated with cage trapping (moderate to severe for hours) with concussive killing (moderate for minutes). The impact of snap trapping was highly variable (no impact to extreme for seconds to minutes). Snap traps should be regulated and tested to identify those that cause rapid unconsciousness; such traps might represent the most welfare-friendly option assessed for killing rats. Our results can be used to integrate consideration of rat welfare alongside other factors, including cost, efficacy, safety, non-target animal welfare and public acceptability when selecting management methods. We also highlight ways of reducing welfare impacts and areas where more data are needed.
The objective of this study was to describe early postpartum estrous behavior and ovulation in lactating dairy cows using radiotelemetry. Cows (n=50) were continuously monitored for behavioral estrus with a radiotelemetric system, HeatWatch II (CowChips LLC, Manalapan, NJ), from d 14 to approximately d 49 postpartum. Blood collection for analysis of progesterone and ovarian ultrasonography were performed once weekly starting on d 14. First ovulation was associated with behavioral estrus in 5 cows and occurred at 28.2±10.8 d (mean±SD; range 17 to 40 d). The average duration of estrus was 6.0±4.9 h (range 3 to 12.2 h), and the mean number of standing events was 18.4±8.9 (range 4 to 26). Based on progesterone concentrations of ≥1 ng/mL, estimated first postpartum ovulation occurred at 25.1±10.4 d (range 10 to 49 d) for 38 animals without evidence of behavioral estrus. The interval to estimated first ovulation without behavioral estrus was not different from the interval to first ovulation associated with behavioral estrus. Level of milk production and body condition score loss did not affect the interval to estimated first ovulation without estrus or first ovulation associated with estrus. Six animals did not show evidence of ovulation based on progesterone concentration, whereas 1 cow showed evidence of estrous behavior on the day before removal from the study. The majority of first postpartum ovulations (38/43; 88.4%) were not associated with behavioral estrus.
Areas of the Northwest United States are trace mineral deficient, necessitating oral and/or parenteral supplementation in livestock. Selenium has been shown to be an important component of the antioxidant system of mammalian cells, and deficiency is known to be associated with white muscle disease and ill thrift in young calves. Recommended serum selenium levels for adult cattle are 0.08-0.30 pg/mL, and cattle are considered marginally deficient in selenium when serum levels are 0.03-0.07 pg/mL. There is scant evidence in the scientific literature comparing different commercially available parenteral supplements in dairy calves. This trial evaluated serum trace mineral levels, injection site and clinical aptitude scores (ISS/CAS) of neonatal dairy calves supplemented with two common parenteral trace mineral products.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
hi@scite.ai
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
Copyright © 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.