No abstract

The scope of practice of the osteopathic profession in Italy is underreported. The first part of the present study investigated the Italian osteopaths' profile, focusing on the socio-demographic information and geographical distribution together with the main characteristics of their education. The OPERA-IT study highlighted that the majority of respondents declared to work as sole practitioners (58.4%), while the remaining declared to work as part of a team. Since teamwork and networking are recognized as fundamental aspects of healthcare, the present study aims to compare the osteopathic practice, diagnostic and treatment modalities of osteopaths who work as a sole practitioner and osteopaths who work as part of a team to highlight possible differences. Moreover, patients' characteristics will be presented. The OPERA-IT study population was chosen to provide a representative sample. A web campaign was set up to inform the Italian osteopaths before the beginning of the study. The OPERA IT study used a previously tested questionnaire. The questionnaire was translated into Italian following the World Health Organization recommendation. The questionnaire was composed of 57 items grouped in five sections, namely: socio-demographics, osteopathic education and training, working profile, organization, and management of the clinical practice and patient profile. The survey was delivered online through a dedicated platform. The survey was completed by 4,816 individuals. Osteopaths who work as sole practitioners represented the majority of the sample (n = 2814; 58.4%). Osteopaths who work as part of a team declared to collaborate mostly with physiotherapists (n = 1121; 23.3%), physicians with speciality (n = 1040; 21.6%), and other osteopaths (n = 943; 19.6%). The two groups showed heterogeneous characteristics. Significative differences were observed in all the factors, namely: geographical distribution, age, gender, training, working contract and working place, daily consultations and time for each consultation, fees, and the average waiting period to book an appointment. The principal component analysis

From January 1968 to July 1983, 38 patients with an intracardiac myxoma underwent surgical excision of the tumor at our Institution. There were 15 males and 23 females, ranging in age from 17 to 68 years (mean 47.7). In all but 2 patients, the presence of an intracardiac myxoma was documented preoperatively by angiographic and/or echocardiographic study. The first 2 patients of this series were referred with the diagnosis of mitral stenosis, and the myxoma was an unexpected surgical finding. In 32 cases (84.2%) the myxoma was located in the left atrium, in 4 (10.5%) in the right atrium and in 2 (5.3%) in the right ventricle. Surgery was performed on an emergency basis in 36 patients. Two patients (5.2%) both with a left atrial myxoma, died after surgery: one died intraoperatively of hemorrhage and the other after one month of bowel infarction. Follow-up of the 36 survivors ranges from 3 months to 14.5 years (average 5.2 yr); all were controlled by means of clinical and echocardiographic investigations, and no evidence of tumor recurrence was detected. Surgery for intracardiac myxoma, which should be undertaken on an emergency basis, carries a low operative risk; excision of the tumor appears to be curative with no recurrences at long-term follow-up; non-invasive tools are of the utmost importance in both the preoperative assessment and follow-up of these patients.

No abstract

No abstract

No abstract

No abstract

No abstract