РезюмеПри хирургических вмешательствах абдоминальные спайки ограничивают возможности проведения безопасных манипуляций как на этапе доступа, так и при выполнении оперативного приема. Уменьшить количество связанных с ними осложнений возможно при наличии данных об их локализации. Арсенал методов дооперационной диагностики спаек сильно ограничен. С этой целью применяется ультразвуковое исследование, магнитно-резонансная и компьютерная томография. Работа является первой частью обзора, посвященного изучению методов неинвазивной диагностики спаек и раскрывает возможности ультразвукового метода.
This article is part 2 of our review assessing diagnostic modalities. In the first part, we analyzed the ultrasonography capabilities to detect abdominal adhesions. The second part assesses the effectiveness of MRI and CT.MRI and CT modalities are much less commonly used in detecting adhesions than ultrasonography. MRI has approximately the same prognostic capabilities as ultrasonography in detecting adhesions between the viscera and the abdominal wall, and it additionally detects adhesions between the abdominal organs. Yet, MRI is significantly more time-consuming and highly dependent on the radiologist experience. Like ultrasonography, MRI determines the extent of adhesions but not the type.Native CT does not visualize abdominal adhesions, though its findings in artificial pneumoperitoneum are superior in diagnostic value to those of ultrasonography and MRI, so this modality should be considered.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.