Two methods to determine numbers of the blackleg pathogen, Erwinia carotovora subsp. atroseptica, in tuber peel extract were compared; (1) growth and cavity formation on crystal violet pectate (CVP) medium (PCrombelon, Lumb & Hyman, 1987) and (2) immunofluorescent colony (IFC) staining (Van Vuurde & Roozen, 1990) using an antiserum against the bacterium conjugated with fluorescein isothiocyanate. Detection, identification and quantification of the bacterium based on the differential effect of temperature on growth in the CVP method were severely restricted and in some cases could not be done at low peel extract dilutions containing > lo6 saprophytic bacteria ml-' and > lo3 cells ml-' of E. carotovora subsp. carotouora. In contrast, although recovery was c. 50% relative to growth of E.c. atroseptica alone on nutrient agar, numbers of the bacteria could be determined by the IFC method regardless of numbers of saprophytic bacteria and E. c. carotovora present. Moreover, the tedium of counting colonies on a UV microscope could be avoided by automation using an imaging system on photograph film negatives of the microscope fields.Readily accessible tubers from the top layer of one tonne boxes in commercial stores were c. 10 times less contaminated than those from the middle of the boxes. For the two methods of peel extract preparation examined, the estimated sample size needed with an allowable error of loglo10 E.c. atroseptica cells ml-' extract with 95% confidence, was c. five tubers per box and 14 boxes for extract prepared from individual tubers and c. three lots of 10 tubers per box and 10 boxes for extract from 10 pooled tubers. A blackleg potential index for seed stocks was proposed based on the summation of the weighted number of individually tested tubers in different classes of contamination level.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
hi@scite.ai
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
Copyright © 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.