Low plasma fibrinogen level is common after cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB). Current substitution practice with fibrinogen concentrate generally follows a single measurement and cut-off values from the literature, whereas early postoperative endogenous fibrinogen kinetics is incompletely described and widely disregarded. The aim of this study was to determine the short-term recovery pattern of plasma fibrinogen after CPB weaning. Our hypothesis was that in the absence of surgical bleeding, CPB-induced hypofibrinogenemia would resolve spontaneously and predictably within a few hours. In a prospective, observational study of 26 patients undergoing conventional CPB (cCPB) or minimally invasive extracorporeal circulation (MiECC), Clauss fibrinogen level (C-FIB) was determined at 10 closely spaced time points after protamine administration. Primary endpoint was the time to recovery of post-CPB fibrinogen levels to ≥1.5 g/L. C-FIB reached its nadir after protamine administration corresponding to 62 ± 5% (mean ± SD) of the baseline level after cCPB and 68 ± 7% after MiECC (p = 0.027 vs. cCPB). C-FIB recovered spontaneously at a nearly constant rate of approximately 0.08 g/L per hour. In all patients, C-FIB was ≥1.5 g/L at 4 hours and ≥2.0 g/L at 13 hours after CPB weaning. Following cardiac surgery with CPB and in the absence of surgical bleeding, spontaneous recovery of normal endogenous fibrinogen levels can be expected at a rate of 0.08 g/L per hour. Administration of fibrinogen concentrate triggered solely by a single-point measurement of low plasma fibrinogen some time after CPB is not justified.
ObjectiveTo investigate the periprocedural inflammatory response in patients with isolated aortic valve stenosis undergoing surgical aortic valve replacement (SAVR) or transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) with different technical approaches.Material and MethodsPatients were prospectively allocated to one of the following treatments: SAVR using conventional extracorporeal circulation (CECC, n = 47) or minimized extracorporeal circulation (MECC, n = 15), or TAVI using either transapical (TA, n = 15) or transfemoral (TF, n = 24) access. Exclusion criteria included infection, pre-procedural immunosuppressive or antibiotic drug therapy and emergency indications. We investigated interleukin (IL)-6, IL-8, IL-10, human leukocyte antigen (HLA-DR), white blood cell count, high-sensitivity C-reactive protein (hs-CRP) and soluble L-selectin (sCD62L) levels before the procedure and at 4, 24, and 48 h after aortic valve replacement. Data are presented for group interaction (p-values for inter-group comparison) as determined by the Greenhouse-Geisser correction.ResultsSAVR on CECC was associated with the highest levels of IL-8 and hs-CRP (p<0.017, and 0.007, respectively). SAVR on MECC showed the highest descent in levels of HLA-DR and sCD62L (both p<0.001) in the perioperative period. TA-TAVI showed increased intraprocedural concentration and the highest peak of IL-6 (p = 0.017). Significantly smaller changes in the inflammatory markers were observed in TF-TAVI.ConclusionSurgical and interventional approaches to aortic valve replacement result in inflammatory modulation which differs according to the invasiveness of the procedure. As expected, extracorporeal circulation is associated with the most marked pro-inflammatory activation, whereas TF-TAVI emerges as the approach with the most attenuated inflammatory response. Factors such as the pre-treatment patient condition and the extent of myocardial injury also significantly affect inflammatory biomarker patterns. Accordingly, TA-TAVI is to be classified not as an interventional but a true surgical procedure, with inflammatory biomarker profiles comparable to those found after SAVR. Our study could not establish an obvious link between the extent of the periprocedural inflammatory response and clinical outcome parameters.
Background: Age and comorbidities are reported to induce neurobiological transformations in the brain. Whilst the influence of ageing on anaesthesia-induced electroencephalogram (EEG) changes has been investigated, the effect of comorbidities has not yet been explored. We hypothesised that certain diseases significantly affect frontal EEG alpha and broadband power in cardiac surgical patients. Methods: We analysed the frontal EEGs of 589 patients undergoing isoflurane general anaesthesia from a prospective observational study. We used multi-and uni-variable regression to analyse the relationships between comorbidities and age as independent with peak and oscillatory alpha, and broadband power as dependent variables. A score of comorbidities and minimum alveolar concentration (MAC) was built to interrogate the combined effect of age and score on alpha and broadband power. Results: At the univariable level, many comorbidities were associated with lower EEG alpha or broadband power. Multivariable regression indicated the independent association of numerous comorbidities and MAC with peak alpha (R 2 ¼0.19) and broadband power (R 2 ¼0.31). The association with peak alpha power is markedly reduced when the underlying broadband effect is subtracted (R 2 ¼0.09). Broadband measures themselves are more strongly correlated with comorbidities and MAC (R 2 ¼0.31) than age (R 2 ¼0.15). Conclusions: Comorbidities and age are independently associated with decreasing frontal EEG alpha and broadband power during general anaesthesia. For alpha power, the association is highly dependent on the underlying broadband effect. These findings might have significant clinical consequences for automated computation for depth of anaesthesia in comorbid patients, because misclassification might pose the risk of under-or over-dosing of anaesthetics. Clinical trial registration: NCT02976584.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
hi@scite.ai
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
Copyright © 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.