Introduction: Transverse colon cancer (TCC) is poorly studied, and TCC cases are often excluded from large prospective randomized trials because of their complexity and their potentially high complication rate. The best surgical approach for TCC has yet to be established. The aim of this large retrospective multicenter Italian series is to investigate the advantages and disadvantages of both hemicolectomy and transverse colectomy in order to identify the best surgical approach. Materials and methods: This was a retrospective cohort study of patients with mid-transverse colon cancer treated with a segmental colon resection or an extended hemicolectomy (right or left) between 2006 and 2016 in 28 high-volume (more than 70 procedures/year) Italian referral centers for colorectal surgery.Results: The study included 1529 patients, 388 of whom underwent a segmental resection while 1141 underwent an extended resection. A higher number of complications has been reported in the segmental group than in the extended group (30.1% versus 23.6%; p 0.010). In 42 cases the main complication was the anastomotic leak (4.4% versus 2.2%; p 0.020). Recovery outcomes also showed statistical differences: time to first flatus (p 0.014), time to first mobilization (p 0.040), and overall hospital stay (p < 0.001) were significantly shorter in the extended group. Even if overall survival were similar between the groups (95.1% versus 97%; p 0.384), 3-year disease-free survival worsened after segmental resection (78.1% versus 86.2%; p 0.001). Conclusions: According to our results, an extended right colon resection for TCC seems to be surgically safer and more oncologically valid.
Objective-To evaluate the outcome of pregnancy in women with mechanical heart valve prostheses in relation to the anticoagulant treatment used in the first trimester and the incidence of thrombotic and bleeding complications. Methods-92 pregnancies in 59 women were followed between 1986 and 1997. In 31 pregnancies, oral anticoagulants were discontinued when pregnancy was diagnosed and subcutaneous heparin was started (12 500 U every 12 hours) adjusted to prolong the adjusted partial thromboplastin time to twice the control level. In the second trimester oral anticoagulants were resumed but changed to heparin again 15 days before the expected delivery date. In 61 pregnancies oral anticoagulants were continued during the first trimester. The same regimen of heparin was used for delivery. Results-Abortion or fetal losses were similar (p = 0.5717) in women exposed to oral anticoagulants in the first trimester (13/61; 25%) compared with those who received adjusted subcutaneous heparin (6/31; 19%). Embolic episodes were more common (p = 0.0029) in women who received heparin (4.92%) compared with those on oral anticoagulants (0.33%). Embolic episodes were cerebral and transient. No valve thromboses were observed. No malformations appeared in the 71 newborns, except for one case of hydrocephalus. There were no maternal deaths secondary to thrombotic complications. The only death was the result of major bleeding after the delivery of a premature stillborn. Conclusions-Oral anticoagulants seem to be safer for the mother than adjusted subcutaneous heparin. Heparin does not oVer a clear advantage over oral anticoagulation in the pregnancy outcome.
Our treatment schedule achieved symptom control in the majority of patients. Early evaluation after 20 Gy allowed selection of responsive patients that could benefit from more prolonged treatment.
Two consecutive studies for adult patients with acute lymphoblastic leukemia without previous treatment were analyzed and compared. Protocol ALL-79 included 137 patients treated with a 'standard therapy' consisting of prednisone, vincristine and daunomycin as induction, CNS prophylaxis with IT chemotherapy and maintenance with 6-mercaptopurine, methotrexate and pulses with vincristine and prednisone. Protocol ALL-82 included 145 patients treated with an 'intensive therapy' consisting of 8 weeks of induction with vincristine, prednisone, daunomycin and L-asparaginase, followed by 6-mercaptopurine, cyclophosphamide and cytosine arabinoside. At 3 months after induction, a 6-week consolidation therapy was given, with vincristine, adriamycin, dexamethasone and L-asparaginase, followed by cyclophosphamide, cytosine arabinoside and 6-mercaptopurine. Rates of complete remission were 80% and 78% for protocols ALL-79 and ALL-82 respectively. The probability of remaining in complete remission at 80 months was 20% and 34%, respectively (p = 0.0014). Median survival for protocol ALL-79 was 14 months, and 34 months for protocol ALL-82; at 80 months the probability of survival is 22% and 35% for the two protocols (P = 0.0024). In protocol ALL-82, the probability of remaining in CR for favorable prognosis patients (age = less than 35 years and WBC = less than 50.000) is 56% at 80 months, and only 8% at 50 months for the unfavorable group (age greater than 35 and/or WBC greater than 50.000) (P = 0.0012). The probability of survival was statistically superior in patients with favorable prognoses, with 54% of them still alive at 60 months compared to only 13% of patients with unfavorable prognoses (P = 0.0085).(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.