Four Holstein steers (208 kg) with "T" cannulas in the rumen and proximal duodenum were used in a 4 x 4 Latin square design experiment to evaluate the interaction of feed intake level on comparative ruminal and total tract digestion of dry-rolled and steam-flaked corn. The basal diet contained (DM basis) 6% alfalfa hay, 6% sudangrass hay, 75% corn, 2% yellow grease, 5% cottonseed meal, 3% cane molasses, and 3% supplement. The corn portion of the diet was provided as either dry-rolled (density = .54 kg/L) or steam-flaked (density = .36 kg/L). Dry matter intake was restricted to allow for .64 vs 1.28 kg/d of weight gain (1.6 vs 2.4% of BW). Ruminal digestibility of OM, starch, and feed N were not affected (P > .10) by DMI. Postruminal digestion of OM and N and total tract digestibility of OM and DE decreased (P < .05) as DMI was increased. Total tract starch digestibility was not influenced (P > .10) by DMI. Steam flaking corn increased (P < .05) ruminal digestibility of OM and starch and postruminal and total tract digestibility of OM, starch, N, DE, and ME. Increasing DMI and steam flaking decreased (P < .05) ruminal pH and molar proportion of acetate. It is concluded that corn processing is the primary factor influencing site and extent of starch digestion. Decreasing DMI increases DE value of the diet; however, ME value is not affected because of increased energy loss as methane.
A metabolism trial and a growth-performance trial were conducted to evaluate the interaction of dietary magnesium level (.18 vs .32%) and laidlomycin propionate (LP) (0 vs 11 ppm, airdry basis) on utilization of a high-energy finishing diet by feedlot steers. There were no treatment effects (P > .10) on ruminal and total tract digestion of OM and ADF. However, there was an interaction (P < .05) between magnesium level and LP on ruminal starch digestion. With LP, magnesium level had no effect on ruminal starch digestion. Without LP, increasing dietary magnesium decreased ruminal starch digestion. Laidlomycin propionate decreased (P < .10) ruminal degradation of feed N (13.9%) and microbial efficiency (8.9%) and increased (P < .10) total tract N digestibility. There were no treatment interactions (P > .10) on site and extent of magnesium digestion. Magnesium absorption decreased with increased dietary magnesium (11.6%, P < .05) and LP (16.9%, P < .01). There was an interaction (P < .10) of treatments on postabomasal calcium absorption. With the low magnesium level LP increased calcium absorption, whereas with the higher magnesium level LP decreased calcium absorption. There was an interaction between magnesium level and LP on ruminal pH at .5 h (P < .05) and 8 h (P < .10) after feeding. In general, ruminal pH increased with LP supplementation at the lower magnesium level and decreased with LP supplementation at the higher magnesium level. There were interactions (P < .05) between magnesium level and LP on ruminal VFA molar proportions and estimated methane production. At the lower magnesium level, the effects of LP on VFA molar proportions were small. At the higher magnesium level, however, LP decreased (13.2%) molar proportions of acetate and increased (26.5%) molar proportions of propionate. There was an interaction (P < .05) between magnesium level and LP on feed intake. At the lower magnesium level, LP increased (3.9%) feed intake; at the higher magnesium level LP decreased (4.4%) intake. Increasing dietary magnesium enhanced ADG (6%, P < .10). Both magnesium and LP enhanced (2.8%, P < .10) diet NE, and this effect was strictly additive. There were no effects (P > .10) of magnesium level or LP on plasma magnesium concentrations. Plasma calcium concentrations were decreased by supplemental magnesium (15.2%, P < .05) and increased by LP (16.0%, P < .01). We conclude that dietary magnesium levels modulate the metabolic and performance responses of feedlot steers to supplemental LP.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
hi@scite.ai
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
Copyright © 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.