We analyzed the leader region of human immunodeficiency virus type 1 (HIV-1) RNA to decipher the nature of the cis-acting E/⌿ element required for encapsidation of viral RNA into virus particles. Our data indicate that, for RNA encapsidation, there are at least two functional subregions in the leader region. One subregion is located at a position immediately proximal to the major splice donor, and the second is located between the splice donor and the beginning of the gag gene. This suggests that at least two discrete cis-acting elements are recognition signals for encapsidation. To determine whether specific putative RNA secondary structures serve as the signal(s) for encapsidation, we constructed primary base substitution mutations that would be expected to destabilize these potential structures and second-site compensatory mutations that would restore secondary structure. Analysis of these mutants allowed the identification of two discrete hairpins that facilitate RNA encapsidation in vivo. Thus, the HIV-1 E/⌿ region is a multipartite element composed of specific and functional RNA secondary structures. Compensation of the primary mutations by the second-site mutations could not be attained in trans. This indicates that interstrand base pairing between these two stem regions within the hairpins does not appear to be the basis for HIV-1 RNA dimer formation. Comparison of the hypothetical RNA secondary structures from 10 replication-competent HIV-1 strains suggests that a subset of the hydrogen-bonded base pairs within the stems of the hairpins is likely to be required for function in cis.

To determine whether there is a cis-acting effect of translational expression of gag on RNA encapsidation, we compared the encapsidation of wild-type RNA with that of a mutant in which the translation of gag was ablated. This comparison indicated that there is not such a cis effect. To determine what is necessary and sufficient for encapsidation, we measured the relative encapsidation efficiencies of human immunodeficiency virus type 1 vector RNAs containing mutations in domains proximal to the canonical encapsidation signal or containing large deletions in the remainder of the genome. These data indicate that TAR and two additional regions are required for encapsidation and that the 5 end of the genome is sufficient for encapsidation. The Rev-responsive element is required mainly for efficient RNA transport from the nucleus to the cytoplasm. A foreign sequence was found to have a negative effect on encapsidation upon placement within the parental vector. Interestingly, this negative effect was compounded by multiple copies of the sequence.

Retinoic acid regulation of one member of the human class I alcohol dehydrogenase (ADH) gene family was demonstrated, suggesting that the retinol dehydrogenase function of ADH may play a regulatory role in the biosynthetic pathway for retinoic acid. Promoter activity of human ADH3, but not ADHI or ADH2, was shown to be activated by retinoic acid in transient transfection assays of Hep3B human hepatoma cells. Deletion mapping experiments identified a region in the ADH3 promoter located between -328 and -272 bp which confers retinoic acid activation. This region was also demonstrated to confer retinoic acid responsiveness on the ADH1 and ADH2 genes in heterologous promoter fusions. Within a 34-bp stretch, the ADH3 retinoic acid response element (RARE) contains two TGACC motifs and one TGAAC motif, both of which exist in RAREs controiling other genes. A block mutation of the TGACC sequence located at -289 to -285 bp eliminated the retinoic acid response. As assayed by gel shift DNA binding studies, the RARE region (-328 to -272 bp) of ADH3 bound the human retinoic acid receptor , (RAR,3) and was competed for by DNA containing a RARE present in the gene encoding RARI. Since ADH catalyzes the conversion of retinol to retinal, which can be further converted to retinoic acid by aldehyde dehydrogenase, these results suggest that retinoic acid activation of ADH3 constitutes a positive feedback loop regulating retinoic acid synthesis.Retinoic acid has profound effects on vertebrate limb and nervous system morphogenesis as well as epithelial cell differentiation (12,31,40). The effects of retinoic acid are transduced by binding to a nuclear retinoic acid receptor (RAR) which, in the presence of ligand, is transformed into a transcription factor (6,14,28). Recently, a RAR gene family (RARa, -,B, and --y) has been discovered (3, 49), and differential expression of these receptors is undoubtedly important for correct transduction of the retinoic acid signal in various target tissues (9). There also exists another nuclear retinoic acid receptor, designated RXRc, which is not part of the RAR family and which is expressed highly in liver (23). Genes that respond to retinoic acid have been identified, and characterization of the retinoic acid response element (RARE) has been accomplished for genes encoding growth hormone (42), laminin Bi (45), RAR1 (7), and osteocalcin (33).One important aspect of retinoic acid-induced differentiation that is not understood is the mechanism regulating synthesis of retinoic acid from retinol (vitamin A). In mammals, retinol is reversibly oxidized to retinal by a cytosolic retinol dehydrogenase that is identical to class I alcohol dehydrogenase (ADH; EC 1.1.1.1), the enzyme which also functions as an ethanol dehydrogenase (21,22,26,29,44,48 tide subunits encoded by three closely related genes ADHI, ADH2, and ADH3, respectively (34). The substrate specificities of the various class I ADH isozymes (i.e., aa, 13, yy, a1, ay, and P-y) are very similar (43). Human ADH classes II and III are encoded by A...

At least two hairpins in the 5 untranslated leader region, stem-loops 1 and 3 (SL1 and SL3), contribute to human immunodeficiency virus type 1 RNA encapsidation in vivo. We used a competitive assay, which measures the relative encapsidation efficiency of mutant viral RNA in the presence of competing wild-type RNA, to compare the contributions of SL1, SL3, and two adjacent secondary structures, SL2 and SL4, to encapsidation. SL2 is not required for RNA encapsidation, while SL1, SL3, and SL4 all contribute approximately equally to encapsidation. To determine whether these hairpins function in a position-dependent manner, we interchanged the positions of two of these stem-loop structures. This resulted in substantial diminution of encapsidation, indicating that the secondary structures that comprise E, the encapsidation signal, function only in their correct contexts. Mutation of nucleotides flanking SL1 and SL3 had little effect on encapsidation. We also showed that SL1, while present on both genomic and subgenomic viral RNAs, nonetheless contributes to selective encapsidation of genomic RNA. Taken together, these data are consistent with the formation of a higher-order RNA structure, partially composed of SL1, SL3, and SL4, that functions to effect concurrent encapsidation of full-length RNA and exclusion of subgenomic RNA. Finally, it has been reported that E is required for efficient translation of Gag mRNA in vivo. However, we have found that a variety of mutants, including a mutant lacking the entire region encompassing SL1, SL2, and SL3, still produce RNAs that are efficiently translated. These data indicate that E is unlikely to contribute to efficient Gag mRNA translation in vivo.

No abstract