The elicited clinical knowledge, the quality of the samples sent to the pathologists seem to suggest the advisability for the GDPs to perform diagnostic biopsies.
Clinically significant lingual thyroid is an unusual developmental anomaly, and carcinoma arising in lingual thyroid, an extremely rare entity. Here we describe the cytologic, histologic, immunohistochemical, and ultrastructural findings of the first poorly differentiated oxyphilic (Hürthle cell) carcinoma described in lingual thyroid along with a review of the literature. Carcinoma arising in lingual thyroid was reported in 12 males and 21 females age 12 to 86 yr (mean age: 40). Because in nonneoplastic lingual thyroid there exists an intimate and irregular relationship of normal follicles with the surrounding skeletal muscle fibers, unequivocal infiltration, with desmoplastic response, and/or vascular invasion should be demonstrated before making a diagnosis of carcinoma. Immunostain for thyroglobulin is the most useful marker for the differential diagnosis. Although, in some older cases, the precise histologic type is difficult to determine, follicular carcinoma seems to be prevalent. This contrasts with the predominance of the papillary type in thyroglossal duct associated carcinoma. This fact is probably related to the history of hypothyroidism and compensatory hyperplasia secondary to the absence of the orthotopic gland, like that occurring in areas of endemic goiter.
Oral lichen planus (OLP) is a chronic inflammatory disease with different clinical presentations that can be classified as reticular or atrophic-erosive. Sixty-two OLP patients were studied to evaluate the clinical-pathologic characteristics of their OLP lesions and to investigate possible differences in their biological behavior. The most common clinical presentation was the reticular type (62.9% vs 37.1%). Atrophic-erosive presentations showed significantly longer evolution (chi square=4.454; p=0.049), more extensive lesions (chi square=16.211; p=0.000) and more sites affected than reticular ones (chi square=10.048; p=0.002). Atrophic-erosive OLP was more frequently found on the tongue, gingiva and floor of the mouth. No statistically significant differences could be identified between reticular and atrophic-erosive clinical presentations in terms of age, sex, tobacco habit, plasma cortisol level and depth of inflammatory infiltrate. We concluded that the classification of OLP lesions as reticular vs atrophic-erosive is a simple, easy to use classification that can identify clinical presentations with different biological behavior.
The reported prevalence rate of anti-hepatitis C virus (HCV) antibodies in patients with oral lichen planus shows wide geographical variation and ranges from 0 to 65%. Certain characteristic clinical features have been attributed to oral lichen planus associated to HCV infection. The purpose of this investigation has been to assess hypothetical clinical differences, as well as differences in the intensity of the subepithelial inflammatory infiltrate between oral lichen planus-HCV +ve patients and oral lichen planus-HCV -ve patients. A total of sixty-two patients entered the study. Their mean age was 63.5 +/- 14.49 years, and 48.4% of them were men and 51.6% women. Patients were classified according to their serum HCV positivity. Age, sex, clinical presentation (reticular or atrophic-erosive), extension of the lesions, location of the lesions, number of locations affected, intensity of the inflammatory infiltrate and Candida albicans colonization were recorded for each patient. Reticular lichen planus was the most frequent clinical presentation in both HCV +ve (57.1%) and HCV -ve patients (63.6%). C. albicans colonization ranged from 42.8% in HCV +ve and 41.7% in HCV -ve patients. HCV + ve patients showed certain oral locations more frequently affected than HCV -ve ones: lip mucosa, 28.6% versus 7.3%; tongue, 57.1% versus 29.1%; and gingiva, 71.4% versus 23.6%. The number of affected intraoral locations was higher in HCV +ve patients (71.4%) than among HCV -ve ones (20.4%; chi2 = 8.34; P < 0.011). No statistically significant differences could be established in terms of density of subepithelial inflammatory infiltrate between the groups. Our results reinforce the need for liver examination in all patients with oral lichen planus, particularly those showing lesions on the gingiva with multiple intraoral locations affected, as no pathological differences could be identified between HCV + ve and HCV -ve patients.
Heat shock proteins (HSPs) play a significant role in cell proliferation, differentiation, and oncogenesis. HSP70 and HSP27 are constitutively and gradually expressed in a broad range of normal tissues and neoplasms, and their expression has been assessed as markers for oral epithelial dysplasia. The study involved 43 patients with oral leukoplakia (OL): 23 were categorized as nondysplastic and 20 as dysplastic OLs. Immunohistochemistry was carried out with the monoclonal antibodies HSP70 and HSP27. The presence of epithelial dysplasia and its histologic grading was evaluated according to the World Health Organization classification: mild, moderate, and severe squamous epithelial dysplasia. Expression of HSPs within the epithelium was also evaluated. The difference in the percentage of HSP70 positive nuclei in nondysplastic and dysplastic OL reached statistical significance(Equation is included in full-text article.)95% confidence interval = 17.74-43.82; P = 0.000). None of the 43 specimens analyzed showed positive nuclear immunostaining for anti-HSP27 antibody. No significant difference for HSP27 cytoplasmic expression could be identified between OL with or without epithelial dysplasia(Equation is included in full-text article.)95% confidence interval = 0.44-3.95; P = 0.89). It is concluded that the nuclear HSP70 immunoexpression could be an objective marker for the presence of the epithelial dysplasia in OL.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
hi@scite.ai
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
Copyright © 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.