No abstract

These data demonstrate differences in the HPA axis activity and sensitivity to glucocorticoids between obese women differing in their body fat distribution, with both enhanced negative and positive feedback in those with abdominal obesity. Several mechanisms may explain these differences: central vs. peripheral hypotheses. Thus, abdominal obesity does not appear to be linked solely to one pathophysiological hypothesis.

The hypothalamo-pituitary-adrenal axis is involved throughout the exercise-recovery cycle. Nevertheless, differences in hormone responses during early recovery between sedentary and endurance trained subjects are not well known. The aim of this preliminary study was to monitor plasma cortisol and adrenocorticotropic hormone (ACTH) concentrations both during and after the end of running exercise performed by four endurance trained adults (marathon men) compared to four sedentary subjects. Two parameters, i.e. intensity and duration, were changed on 4 consecutive days. The 1st day (D0) was spent in the laboratory: all blood samples were obtained at rest to determine diurnal variations of each hormone. On the following days (D1-D4) the subjects exercised: D1 and D2 brief (20 min), light (50% maximal heart rate HRmax, D1) or strenuous (80% HRmax, D2), D3 and D4 prolonged (120 min), light (D3) or strenuous (D4). In both groups, neither brief (D1, D2) nor prolonged light exercise (D3) induced any significant variation in plasma ACTH or cortisol concentrations. Plasma ACTH and cortisol concentrations increased only if the exercise was intense and prolonged (D4). The training factor did not modify the intensity or duration thresholds for the activation of the pituitary-adrenocortical response to exercise in the conditions of our experiment. However, during immediate recovery from the four exercise regimens, the plasma ACTH concentrations of the marathon men were constantly above the values of the sedentary subjects, although plasma cortisol concentration remained similar in both groups. As an indirect means of evaluating the relationships between ACTH and cortisol we compared the areas under the cortisol and ACTH curves (AUC) from 0.5 to 3.5 h during recovery from D1 to D4 compared to D0 at the same time. Cortisol AUC were similar in the sedentary subjects and marathon men although the ACTH AUC were different in the sedentary subjects and marathon men, suggesting a change in the pituitary-adrenal relationship at some yet indeterminate level. During the immediate recovery from exercise whatever its intensity, the magnitude of the ACTH response was increased in the trained subjects but with a reduced effect upon its target, the adrenal glands. This phenomenon has not been described in the literature. Two non-exclusive phenomena may be involved, i.e. a decreased adrenal sensitivity to ACTH stimulation, and/or a decreased hypothalamo-pituitary axis sensitivity to cortisol negative feedback.

In endurance-trained athletes, displaying a moderate but sustained endogenous cortisol increase: (1) ACTH responses following pituitary stimulation are not blunted, (2) cortisol responses following maximal adrenal stimulation are not blunted. Our results favour the hypothesis of a decreased pituitary sensitivity to cortisol negative feedback whereas the hypothesis of a major decreased adrenal sensitivity to ACTH was discarded. The greater ability of saliva assays to detect a cortisol increase strongly supports its use in the study of HPA physiology, whether under basal or dynamic conditions.

Although plasma and 24 h urinary free cortisol (UFC) levels are normal in obese subjects, pharmacological investigations have identified minor hypothalamo-pituitary-adrenal axis differences in patients with abdominal body fat distribution (A-BFD) vs peripheral BFD (P-BFD). Using recent tools such as saliva cortisol or overnight urinary free cortisol upon creatinine ratio (UFC/UC) determinations, we have investigated a population of obese females according to their body fat distribution. In-patients subjects (no.=82) were subjected to routine biochemical testing, 24 h and overnight UFC/UC, basal and post-1 mg overnight dexamethasone-suppressing test plasma and saliva cortisol determinations. Central obesity defined by a waist-to-hip ratio (WHR) >0.85 was found in 64% of the subjects vs 87% when defined by waist girth (WG) corrected for age. Despite identical body mass index, A-BFD subjects were more prone to hypertension using both classifications and had higher triglycerides (WHR classification) or higher triglycerides, cholesterol and glycemia (WG classification). Plasma cortisol levels were similar but saliva cortisol levels were lower in the A-BFD group using the WG classification. The 24 h UFC/UC were similar but the overnight UFC/UC were higher in the A-BFD group using the WHR classification. These mild differences in cortisol nocturnal secretion and free cortisol indexes in subjects with different body fat mass distribution suggest that their hypothalamo-pituitary-adrenal axis has a spontaneously subtly different regulation.