Objective-To define the pattern of disease expression in patients with childhood onset systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE).Methods-Prospective analysis of clinical manifestations and immunological features of 34 patients in whom the first manifestations appeared in childhood from a series of 430 unselected patients with SLE. Results-Thirty one (91%) patients from the childhood onset group were female and three male (9%) (ratio female/male, 10/1, with no diVerence compared with the adult onset group). Mean age of this group at disease onset was 11 years (range 5-14) compared with 32 years (15-48) for the remaining patients. The childhood onset patients more often had nephropathy (20% v 9% in adult onset SLE, p=0.04; OR:2.7; 95%CI:1.1, 7), fever (41% v 21%, p=0.006; OR:2.6, 95%CI:1.2, 5.7), and lymphadenopathy (6% v 0.5%, p=0.03, OR: 12.3, 95%CI: 1.2, 127.6), as presenting clinical manifestations. During the evolution of the disease, the childhood onset patients had an increased prevalence of malar rash (79% v 51%, p=0.002; OR:3.7; 95%CI:1.5, 9.5) and chorea (9% v 0%, p<0.0001). This group exhibited a higher prevalence of anticardiolipin antibodies (aCL) of the IgG isotype when compared with the remaining patients (29% v 13%, p=0.017; OR:2.9, 95%CI:1.2, 6.8). No significant diVerences were found among the other antibodies between the two groups. Childhood onset patients more often received azathioprine (15% v 6%, p=0.00004; OR:11.2; 95%CI:2.8, 44.9) but no diVerences were detected between the groups concerning side eVects or drug toxicity. Conclusions-The presentation and the clinical course of SLE varied in this series of 430 patients depending on their age at disease onset. Nephropathy, fever, and lymphadenopathy were more common in childhood onset patients as presenting clinical manifestations, while malar rash, chorea, and detection of IgG aCL were more common during the evolution of the disease.(Ann Rheum Dis 1998;57:456-459)

Objective IgG4‐related disease (IgG4‐RD) can cause fibroinflammatory lesions in nearly any organ. Correlation among clinical, serologic, radiologic, and pathologic data is required for diagnosis. This work was undertaken to develop and validate an international set of classification criteria for IgG4‐RD. Methods An international multispecialty group of 86 physicians was assembled by the American College of Rheumatology (ACR) and the European League Against Rheumatism (EULAR). Investigators used consensus exercises, existing literature, derivation and validation cohorts of 1,879 subjects (1,086 cases, 793 mimickers), and multicriterion decision analysis to identify, weight, and test potential classification criteria. Two independent validation cohorts were included. Results A 3‐step classification process was developed. First, it must be demonstrated that a potential IgG4‐RD case has involvement of at least 1 of 11 possible organs in a manner consistent with IgG4‐RD. Second, exclusion criteria consisting of a total of 32 clinical, serologic, radiologic, and pathologic items must be applied; the presence of any of these criteria eliminates the patient from IgG4‐RD classification. Third, 8 weighted inclusion criteria domains, addressing clinical findings, serologic results, radiology assessments, and pathology interpretations, are applied. In the first validation cohort, a threshold of 20 points had a specificity of 99.2% (95% confidence interval [95% CI] 97.2–99.8%) and a sensitivity of 85.5% (95% CI 81.9–88.5%). In the second, the specificity was 97.8% (95% CI 93.7–99.2%) and the sensitivity was 82.0% (95% CI 77.0–86.1%). The criteria were shown to have robust test characteristics over a wide range of thresholds. Conclusion ACR/EULAR classification criteria for IgG4‐RD have been developed and validated in a large cohort of patients. These criteria demonstrate excellent test performance and should contribute substantially to future clinical, epidemiologic, and basic science investigations.

The EULAR Sjögren's syndrome (SS) disease activity index (ESSDAI) is a systemic disease activity index that was designed to measure disease activity in patients with primary SS. With the growing use of the ESSDAI, some domains appear to be more challenging to rate than others. The ESSDAI is now in use as a gold standard to measure disease activity in clinical studies, and as an outcome measure, even a primary outcome measure, in current randomised clinical trials. Therefore, ensuring an accurate and reproducible rating of each domain, by providing a more detailed definition of each domain, has emerged as an urgent need. The purpose of the present article is to provide a user guide for the ESSDAI. This guide provides definitions and precisions on the rating of each domain. It also includes some minor improvement of the score to integrate advance in knowledge of disease manifestations. This user guide may help clinicians to use the ESSDAI, and increase the reliability of rating and consequently of the ability to detect true changes over time. This better appraisal of ESSDAI items, along with the recent definition of disease activity levels and minimal clinically important change, will improve the assessment of patients with primary SS and facilitate the demonstration of effectiveness of treatment for patients with primary SS.

Primary SS is undeniably a systemic disease, with the joints, lungs, skin and peripheral nerves being the most frequently involved organs. Cytopenias, hypocomplementaemia and cryoglobulinaemia at diagnosis strongly correlated with higher cumulated ESSDAI scores in the clinical domains. Clinically the ESSDAI provides a reliable picture of systemic involvement in primary SS.

Patients with primary SS, who present at diagnosis with high systemic activity (ESSDAI ≥14) and/or predictive immunological markers (especially those with more than one), are at higher risk of death.

Sjögren syndrome is a systemic autoimmune disease that principally affects women between the fourth and sixth decades of life who present with sicca symptomatology caused by dryness of the main mucosal surfaces. The clinical spectrum of Sjögren syndrome extends from dryness to systemic involvement. Since 1978, Sjögren syndrome has been closely associated with an enhanced risk of lymphoma, one of the most severe complications a patient may develop. Primary Sjögren syndrome patients have a 10–44-fold greater risk of lymphoma than healthy individuals, higher than that reported for systemic lupus erythematosus and rheumatoid arthritis. The close link between lymphoma and Sjögren syndrome is clearly exemplified by the very specific type of lymphoma arising in Sjögren syndrome patients, mainly low-grade B-cell lymphomas (predominantly a marginal zone histological type) with primary extranodal involvement of the major salivary glands (overwhelmingly parotid), with a primordial role of cryoglobulinemic-related markers (both clinical and immunological). The most recent studies support a higher number of risk factors detected in an individual leads to a higher lymphoma risk. A close follow-up of high-risk groups with longitudinal assessments of all known risk factors, including cryoglobulin-related markers and EULAR Sjögren's syndrome disease activity index measurement in particular, is mandatory.

We evaluated cardiovascular risk factors, morbidity and mortality in patients with lupus nephritis (LN). We prospectively studied 70 consecutive patients with LN, and 70 age- and sex-matched controls with systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) but no evidence of nephropathy, from 1988 to 1998. Patients were evaluated at entry for hypertension, diabetes, hyperlipidaemia, smoking, menopause and antiphospholipid syndrome. The LN patients (64 women, 6 men) had a mean age of 35 years (SE 1.7, range 11-67). During the 10 years, 15 (21%) LN patients and 18 (25%) of the controls were lost to follow-up. Compared with controls, LN patients had a higher prevalence of hyperlipidaemia (44% vs. 2%, p<0.001), hypertension (44% vs. 9%, p<0.001) and antiphospholipid antibodies (45% vs. 22%, p=0.01) at study onset. At the last visit, 37 (67%) LN patients had normal plasma creatinine, 13 (24%) had renal failure and only five (9%) end-stage renal failure. Hyperlipidaemia (78% vs. 27%, p<0.001) and hypertension (67% vs. 32%, p=0.01) at study onset were associated with development of renal failure. Nine LN patients and one control died (16% vs. 2%, p=0.02). These patients showed more antiphospholipid syndrome (56% vs. 17%, p=0.03) and hyperlipidaemia (78% vs. 37%, p=0.03) at study onset. The main causes of death in LN patients were vascular complications (cardiovascular or cerebrovascular events) in five patients (four of whom had antiphospholipid antibodies) and sepsis in three.

The objective was to analyze psychiatric disorders and psychosocial dysfunction in patients with systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE), studied longitudinally during active and subsequent inactive stage of their disease. During a 6 month period of study, we selected 20 consecutive patients with SLE who presented with a SLE flare. All patients fulfilled the 1982 revised criteria of the American College of Rheumatology for the classification of SLE. When patients entered the study, we performed psychiatric (CIS, RDC, STAI, HD, BDI, GHQ and MMS) psychosocial (GAS and VAS-P) scores assessment. One year later, we repeated the psychiatric and psychosocial assessment when patients showed inactive disease. The 20 patients evaluated were women, with a mean age of 34 y (SE 14.4, range 20-57). According to CIS evaluation, we diagnosed 8 (40%) psychiatric cases in the acute episode of SLE. The RDC diagnosis showed generalized anxiety in 5 patients, panic disorders in 2 patients and generalized anxiety plus depressive symptoms in one patient. One year later, when patients did not show disease activity, we diagnosed 2 (10%) psychiatric cases (P<0.05). When SLE patients were clinically inactive, they showed lower levels of psychological distress (GHQ scale, 1.8 vs 5.6, P<0.001), with a lower grade of anxiety measured by both HA (3.2 vs 8.2, P<0.01) and STAI-S (7.95 vs 20.90, P<0.001) scales. We also found a lower score in pain perception (VAS-P) (2.80 vs 4.25, P<0. 01) and higher occupational activity (VAS-P) (83.9 vs 66.2, P<0.01) and general functioning (GAS) (93.75 vs 83.50, P<0.05) during the inactive stage. No significant differences were found when we compared cognitive impairment, grade of depression and physical disability between inactive and active stages. We conclude that in SLE patients, psychiatric and psychosocial disorders during acute episodes are usually mild and seem to be related to the psychological impact of disease activity on patients. This type of psychiatric pathology is similar to that which would be expected in other groups coping with a stressful event, indicating that our patients did not react in a way specifically determined by their systemic disease.