Vanilla ice cream was made with a mix composition of 10.5% milk fat, 10.5% milk SNF, 12% beet sugar, and 4% corn syrup solids. None of the batches made contained stabilizer or emulsifier. The control (treatment 1) contained 3.78% protein. Treatments 2 and 5 contained 30% more protein, treatments 3 and 6 contained 60% more protein, and treatments 4 and 7 contained 90% more protein compared with treatment 1 by addition of whey protein concentrate or milk protein concentrate powders, respectively. In all treatments, levels of milk fat, milk SNF, beet sugar, and corn syrup solids were kept constant at 37% total solids. Mix protein content for treatment 1 was 3.78%, treatment 2 was 4.90%, treatment 5 was 4.91%, treatments 3 and 6 were 6.05%, and treatments 4 and 7 were 7.18%. This represented a 29.89, 60.05, 89.95, 29.63, 60.05, and 89.95% increase in protein for treatment 2 through treatment 7 compared with treatment 1, respectively. Milk protein level influenced ice crystal size; with increased protein, the ice crystal size was favorably reduced in treatments 2, 4, and 5 and was similar in treatments 3, 6, and 7 compared with treatment 1. At 1 wk postmanufacture, overall texture acceptance for all treatments was more desirable compared with treatment 1. When evaluating all parameters, treatment 2 with added whey protein concentrate and treatments 5 and 6 with added milk protein concentrate were similar or improved compared with treatment 1. It is possible to produce acceptable ice cream with higher levels of protein.
The objective of this study was to compare the effects of vacuum-condensed (CM) and ultrafiltered (UF) milk on some compositional and functional properties of Cheddar cheese. Five treatments were designed to have 2 levels of concentration (4.5 and 6.0% protein) from vacuum-condensed milk (CM1 and CM2) and ultrafiltered milk (UF1 and UF2) along with a 3.2% protein control. The samples were analyzed for fat, protein, ash, calcium, and salt contents at 1 wk. Moisture content, soluble protein, meltability, sodium dodecyl sulfate-PAGE, and counts of lactic acid bacteria and nonstarter lactic acid bacteria were performed on samples at 1, 18, and 30 wk. At 1 wk, the moisture content ranged from 39.2 (control) to 36.5% (UF2). Fat content ranged from 31.5 to 32.4% with no significant differences among treatments, and salt content ranged from 1.38 to 1.83% with significant differences. Calcium content was higher in UF cheeses than in CM cheeses followed by control, and it increased with protein content in cheese milk. Ultrafiltered milk produced cheese with higher protein content than CM milk. The soluble protein content of all cheeses increased during 30 wk of ripening. Condensed milk cheeses exhibited a higher level of proteolysis than UF cheeses. Sodium dodecyl sulfate-PAGE showed retarded proteolysis with increase in level of concentration. The breakdown of alphas1- casein and alphas1-I-casein fractions was highest in the control and decreased with increase in protein content of cheese milk, with UF2 being the lowest. There was no significant degradation of beta-casein. Overall increase in proteolytic products was the highest in control, and it decreased with increase in protein content of cheese milk. No significant differences in the counts of lactic starters or nonstarter lactic acid bacteria were observed. Extent as well as method of concentration influenced the melting characteristics of the cheeses. Melting was greatest in the control cheeses and least in cheese made from condensed milk and decreased with increasing level of milk protein concentration. Vacuum condensing and ultrafiltration resulted in Cheddar cheeses of distinctly different quality. Although both methods have their advantages and disadvantages, the selection of the right method would depend upon the objective of the manufacturer and intended use of the cheese.
Cheddar cheeses made from ultra filtered (UF) as well as vacuum condensed milks (CM) containing two protein levels (4.5 and 6.0%) were used to manufacture processed cheeses. These processed cheeses were evaluated for instrumental textural profile analysis (TPA), stress relaxation characteristics using Sintech universal testing machine, and visco elastic characteristics (Elastic modulus-G 0 and viscous modulus-G 00) using a Haake Viscometer. A small amplitude oscillatory shear test was employed to assess the visco elastic characteristics. Peleg model and six elements Maxwell model were used to assess stress relaxation characteristics of the cheese. Results indicated that the instrumental TPA hardness of UF2 cheeses made from high protein UF milk was highest (149 N) as compared to cheeses made from low protein UF milk (125 N), high and low protein vacuum condensed milks (103 and 62 N, respectively), and control (53 N). The values of elastic and viscous moduli of cheeses made utilizing high protein UF milk were 3.53 and 2.32 MPa respectively, which indicated its higher viscoelastic nature. The UF2 cheese also showed higher values of modulus
Milk was concentrated by ultrafiltration (UF) or vacuum condensing (CM) and milks with 2 levels of protein: 4.5% (UF1 and CM1) and 6.0% (UF2 and CM2) for concentrates and a control with 3.2% protein were used for manufacturing 6 replicates of Cheddar cheese. For manufacturing pasteurized process cheese, a 1:1 blend of shredded 18- and 30-wk Cheddar cheese, butter oil, and disodium phosphate (3%) was heated and pasteurized at 74 degrees C for 2 min with direct steam injection. The moisture content of the resulting process cheeses was 39.4 (control), 39.3 (UF1), 39.4 (UF2), 39.4 (CM1), and 40.2% (CM2). Fat and protein contents were influenced by level and method of concentration of cheese milk. Fat content was the highest in control (35.0%) and the lowest in UF2 (31.6%), whereas protein content was the lowest in control (19.6%) and the highest in UF2 (22.46%). Ash content increased with increase in level of concentration of cheese milk with no effect of method of concentration. Meltability of process cheeses decreased with increase in level of concentration and was higher in control than in the cheeses made with concentrated milk. Hardness was highest in UF cheeses (8.45 and 9.90 kg for UF1 and UF2) followed by CM cheeses (6.27 and 9.13 kg, for CM1 and CM2) and controls (3.94 kg). Apparent viscosity of molten cheese at 80 degrees C was higher in the 6.0% protein treatments (1043 and 1208 cp, UF2 and CM2) than in 4.5% protein treatments (855 and 867 cp, UF1 and CM1) and in control (557 cp). Free oil in process cheeses was influenced by both level and method of concentration with control (14.3%) being the lowest and CM2 (18.9%) the highest. Overall flavor, body and texture, and acceptability were higher for process cheeses made with the concentrates compared with control. This study demonstrated that the application of concentrated milks (UF or CM) for Cheddar cheese making has an impact on pasteurized process cheese characteristics.
-Milk standardized to 45 g·kg -1 protein (UF1 and CM1) and 60 g·kg -1 protein (UF2 and CM2) using ultrafiltered milk (150 g·kg -1 protein) or vacuum condensed milk (120 g·kg -1 protein) was used for manufacturing Cheddar cheese. Pasteurized Process cheeses were manufactured using a 1:1 blend of 18-week and 30-week Cheddar cheese. The moisture content of the Process cheeses ranged from 393 to 402 g·kg -1 . Fat content was the highest in the control cheese (350 g·kg -1 ) and the lowest in UF2 (316 g·kg -1 ). Microstructure of cheeses was observed using cryo-scanning electron microscopy. Fat globules of different sizes embedded in the continuous protein network were observed. Whereas, a porous structure with relatively large pores was noted in the control cheese, more compact protein masses were observed in cheeses made from concentrated milk. Fat globules in all cheeses were surrounded by cavities. Firmness of cheese was associated with less porous (compact) protein network. Large areas of dense highly fused protein were observed in UF2 cheeses, which showed the highest resistance to compression (highest firmness). Fractures in the protein network were observed as the firmness of cheese increased. Such fractures reduced the ability of protein network to entrap fat and increased the level of free oil. Appendages connecting fat globules to protein network were seen in cheese containing low amounts of free oil which indicated good emulsifying properties. The continuous less rigid protein structure with good emulsifying properties (the presence of appendages connecting protein network to fat globules) produced cheese with increased meltability. This study shows that the application of concentrated milks for Cheddar cheese-making influences Process cheese functionality and structure. La teneur en matière grasse la plus élevée a été obtenue dans le fromage témoin (350 g·kg -1 ) et la plus faible dans le fromage UF2 (316 g·kg -1 ). La microstructure des fromages a été observée par cryo-microscopie électronique à balayage (cryo-SEM). Des globules gras de différentes tailles, imbriqués dans le réseau protéique continu, ont été observés. Alors qu'une structure poreuse, avec des pores relativement larges, a été observée dans les fromages témoins, des masses protéiques plus compactes sont apparues dans les fromages obtenus avec le lait concentré. Dans tous les fromages, les globules gras étaient entourés de cavités. La fermeté du fromage était associée à un réseau protéique moins poreux (compact). De larges zones de protéines denses très fusionnées ont été observées dans les fromages UF2 présentant la plus grande résistance à la compression (fermeté maximale). Avec l'augmentation de la fermeté des fromages, des fractures sont apparues dans le réseau protéique, réduisant sa capacité à inclure la matière grasse et augmentant le taux de matière grasse libre. Des joints de connexion reliant les globules gras au réseau protéique ont été observés dans le fromage ayant le moins de matière grasse libre, et donc de bonnes pro...
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
hi@scite.ai
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
Copyright © 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.