Background: Vasoplegia has been shown to be associated with increased morbidity and mortality in patients undergoing cardiac surgery. It has been previously stated that low pulsatile states as seen with current left ventricular assist devices (LVADs) may contribute to vasoplegia post LVAD-explant and heart transplant. We sought to examine the literature regarding vasoplegia in the post-operative setting for patients undergoing LVAD explant and heart transplant. Method: A literature review was conducted to firstly define vasoplegia in the setting of LVAD patients, and secondly to better understand the relationship between vasoplegia and LVAD explantation in the postoperative heart transplant patient cohort. A keyword search of ‘vasoplegia’ OR ‘vasoplegic’ AND ‘transplant’ was used. Search engines used were PubMed, Cochrane Library, ClinicalTrials.gov , Ovid, Scopus and grey literature. Results: 17 studies met the selection criteria for review. Three key themes emerged from the literature. Firstly, there is limited consensus regarding the definition of vasoplegia. Secondly, patients with LVADs experienced higher rates of vasoplegia following heart transplant than their counterparts and thirdly, increased cardiopulmonary bypass time was associated with a higher rate of vasoplegia. Conclusion: Vasoplegia is not clearly defined in the literature as it pertains to the LVAD patient cohort. Patients bridged with LVADs appear to have higher rates of vasoplegia, however the aetiology of this is unclear and may be associated with continuous flow physiology or prolonged cardiopulmonary bypass time. A universal definition will aid in risk stratification, early recognition and management.
balanced between groups. Overall, there was a trend towards better survival in thoracotomy group (33.1% vs 66.4%, p=0.06) at 5 years, but higher stroke rate (11% in sternotomy group vs 21% in thoracotomy group, p = 0.035). Following PS-matching, however, there was no difference in early or late mortality (Graph 1) but there was a higher rate of pump exchange in the thoracotomy group (2% vs 9%, p = 0.052). There was no difference in perioperative stroke rates (sternotomy 6% vs thoracotomy 9%), extubation time (2.5 days vs 2.5 days), right ventricular failure (13% vs 14%), renal failure (8% vs 5%) or hospital readmissions (81% vs 88%). Conclusion: Minimally invasive LVAD implantation is feasible and safe in the current LVAD era. In a PS matched analysis, patients in the minimally invasive group displayed lower overall mortality, but without reaching statistical significance. Adverse events were similar in both groups.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.