No abstract

No abstract

The vertical distribution of Hymenophyllaceae species has been related to microenvironmental variations around host trees. We addressed the questions: Do the vertical microenvironmental conditions within forest stands of differing successional statuses vary significantly? Does the diversity of Hymenophyllaceae species differ between forest successional statuses? Are the vertical distribution and diversity of Hymenophyllaceae species related more to humidity or light availability? Are there any interspecific differences in the desiccation tolerance of these species which can be related to their vertical distribution? We characterized the microhabitat conditions (vapor pressure deficit [VPD], air relative humidity [RH], and light availability [PAR]) and the vertical distribution ofHymenophyllaceae species in host trees, in both a secondary forest and an old-growth temperate rainforest in Chile. Chlorophyll fluorescence was used to monitor the integrity of the photosynthetic apparatus during desiccation experiments. The stand basal area, tree height, and leaf area index were all significantly greater in the old-growth forest stands, but VPD, RH, and PAR showed no significant differences between the two forests. Both successional statuses showed the same amount of filmy fern species in terms of both abundance and diversity. In both successional statuses VPD and RH decreased while PAR increased with the height of the hosts. Regardless of the forest's age, abundance and diversity of filmy ferns were greater in microsites of greater humidity and less light availability. Desiccation tolerance differed significantly among Hymenophyllaceae species. The distribution pattern could be better explained by the specific microenvironmental requirements and desiccation tolerance rather than the forest's successional status.

Question: Are differences in microhabitat preferences of co‐occurring epiphytic Hymenophyllaceae species (filmy ferns) correlated with differences in ecophysiological responses to light availability and humidity in the host tree? Location: The Andean foothills in south‐central Chile. Methods: We evaluated the distribution pattern of nine filmy fern species in microhabitats that differ in light availability and humidity in four host tree species. A DCA was developed to assess Hymenophyllaceae species microhabitat preference in terms of canopy openness (CO) and relative humidity. We assessed whether differences in chlorophyll content, maximum photochemical efficiency (Fv/Fm), photosynthetic capacity (Amax), evapotranspiration (E) and instantaneous water use efficiency (WUE) are consistent with any pattern. Results: CO and relative humidity differed significantly with height in the host trees. While CO increased with height in a host tree, relative humidity decreased. DCA analysis showed that filmy fern species distribution within and among trees was mainly explained by the relative humidity of the microhabitat. Chlorophyll content, chlorophyll a/b ratio, Amax and E differed significantly among filmy fern species. Amax and E were correlated with axis 1 scores from the DCA analysis. Conclusions: The vertical distribution and abundance of filmy fern species in Chilean temperate rain forest seems to be closely related to the different microhabitats offered by host trees. This pattern may reflect interspecific differences in ecophysiological traits related both to light availability and humidity. Our results suggest that humidity is the main environmental factor driving functional responses and habitat preferences of these filmy fern species.

Some epiphytic Hymenophyllaceae are restricted to lower parts of the host (<60 cm; 10–100 μmol photons m-2 s-1) in a secondary forest of Southern Chile; other species occupy the whole host height (≥10 m; max PPFD >1000 μmol photons m-2 s-1). Our aim was to study the photosynthetic light responses of two Hymenophyllaceae species in relation to their contrasting distribution. We determined light tolerance of Hymenoglossum cruentum and Hymenophyllum dentatum by measuring gas exchange, PSI and PSII light energy partitioning, NPQ components, and pigment contents. H. dentatum showed lower maximum photosynthesis rates (Amax) than H. cruentum, but the former species kept its net rates (An) near Amax across a wide light range. In contrast, in the latter one, An declined at PPFDs >60 μmol photons m-2 s-1. H. cruentum, the shadiest plant, showed higher chlorophyll contents than H. dentatum. Differences in energy partitioning at PSI and PSII were consistent with gas exchange results. H. dentatum exhibited a higher light compensation point of the partitioning of absorbed energy between photochemical Y(PSII) and non-photochemical Y(NPQ) processes. Hence, both species allocated energy mainly toward photochemistry instead of heat dissipation at their light saturation points. Above saturation, H. cruentum had higher heat dissipation than H. dentatum. PSI yield (YPSI) remained higher in H. dentatum than H. cruentum in a wider light range. In both species, the main cause of heat dissipation at PSI was a donor side limitation. An early dynamic photo-inhibition of PSII may have caused an over reduction of the Qa+ pool decreasing the efficiency of electron donation to PSI. In H. dentatum, a slight increase in heat dissipation due to acceptor side limitation of PSI was observed above 300 μmol photons m-2s-1. Differences in photosynthetic responses to light suggest that light tolerance and species plasticity could explain their contrasting vertical distribution.