Because of technical limitations, an impact of machine milking on the teat tissue cannot be avoided. The continuance of this impact during and after milking depends on a variety of factors related to the physiological regulation of milk ejection, as well as the different production systems and milking machine settings. Milking machine settings aim to achieve a high milking performance, that is, short machine-on time at a maximum of milk harvest. However, a high milking performance level is often related to an impact on the teat tissue caused by vacuum or liner compression that can lead to pathological dimensions of congestion of the tissue or hyperkeratosis as a long-term effect. Toward the end of milking a decrease of milk flow rate causes a raise of mouthpiece and teat end vacuum levels and hence an increase of the impact on the teat tissue and the risk of tissue damage. The mechanical stress by the milking machine activates a cascade of cellular mechanisms that lead to an excessive keratin growth and thickening of the keratin layer. Consequently, a complete closure of the teat canal is disabled and the risk of bacterial invasion and intramammary infection increases. Another consequence of high vacuum impact is fluid accumulation and congestion in the tissue of teat tip and teat basis because of an obstruction in venous return. The present review paper provides an overview of the available scientific information to describe the interaction between different levels and types of system vacuum, mouthpiece chamber vacuum, teat end (claw) vacuum, liner pressure, and the risk of short-term and long-term impacts on the teat tissue.
The objective of this study was to validate and apply 2 different methods to record changes in teat tissue related to machine milking. Teat wall diameter was measured via B-mode ultrasound cross sectioning with a 7.5-MHz linear probe. Teat tissue thickness was measured using a cutimeter (spring-loaded caliper, spring constant 6.5 N/cm, 0.5 N at closed jaws). Both methods were applied at the teat barrel, 2 cm above the teat tip. In experiment 1, 24 teats from freshly slaughtered cows were used to perform ultrasound imaging (12 teats) or cutimeter measurements (12 teats) while the teat cisterns were filled with water to increase the intracisternal pressure from 0 to 30 kPa in steps of 1 kPa. Teat tissue thickness did not change at an intracisternal pressure from 0 to 10 kPa but increased with intracisternal pressure at levels >10 kPa. In contrast, teat wall diameter decreased with intracisternal pressure between 0 and 7 kPa but did not significantly change at a pressure ≥7 kPa up to 30 kPa. Significant Pearson correlation coefficients between intracisternal pressure and teat wall diameter were observed from 0 to 7 kPa (r = −0.38), and between intracisternal pressure and teat tissue thickness from 10 to 30 kPa (r = 0.45). In experiment 2, ultrasound and cutimeter measurements were performed in 12 lactating Holstein cows. Measurements before and during milking, immediately after cluster removal, with normal milking or with a 5-min overmilking, were performed and continued at 5-min intervals for 60 min and at 10-min intervals until 120 min. Additionally, with the 5-min overmilking treatment, measurements were continued at 60-min intervals up to 10 h after milking. Teat wall diameter decreased in response to milk ejection, followed by a continuous increase during the course of milking, with highest values after 5 min overmilking. Teat tissue thickness did not change during milking but was significantly increased after overmilking. Teat wall diameter and teat tissue thickness recovered to premilking levels within 35 min after normal milking and within 60 min after overmilking. Until 10 h after overmilking, the teat wall diameter decreased steadily, whereas teat tissue thickness was unfluctuating. In the physiologically relevant range of intramammary pressure, ultrasound measurements of the teat wall were affected by both intramammary pressure and mechanical forces, whereas cutimeter measurements were not affected by the intramammary pressure.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
hi@scite.ai
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
Copyright © 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.