The number of studies on drug interactions with cimetidine has increased at a rapid rate over the past 5 years, with many of the interactions being solely pharmacokinetic in origin. Very few studies have investigated the clinical relevance of such pharmacokinetic interactions by measuring pharmacodynamic responses or clinical endpoints. Apart from pharmacokinetic studies, invariably conducted in young, healthy subjects, there have been a large number of in vitro and in vivo animal studies, case reports, clinical observations and general reviews on the subject, which is tending to develop an industry of its own accord. Nevertheless, where specific mechanisms have been considered, these have undoubtedly increased our knowledge on the way in which humans eliminate xenobiotics. There is now sufficient information to predict the likelihood of a pharmacokinetic drug-drug interaction with cimetidine and to make specific clinical recommendations. Pharmacokinetic drug interactions with cimetidine occur at the sites of gastrointestinal absorption and elimination including metabolism and excretion. Cimetidine has been found to reduce the plasma concentrations of ketoconazole, indomethacin and chlorpromazine by reducing their absorption. In the case of ketoconazole the interaction was clinically important. Cimetidine does not inhibit conjugation mechanisms including glucuronidation, sulphation and acetylation, or deacetylation or ethanol dehydrogenation. It binds to the haem portion of cytochrome P-450 and is thus an inhibitor of phase I drug metabolism (i.e. hydroxylation, dealkylation). Although generally recognised as a nonspecific inhibitor of this type of metabolism, cimetidine does demonstrate some degree of specificity. To date, theophylline 8-oxidation, tolbutamide hydroxylation, ibuprofen hydroxylation, misonidazole demethylation, carbamazepine epoxidation, mexiletine oxidation and steroid hydroxylation have not been shown to be inhibited by cimetidine in humans but the metabolism of at least 30 other drugs is affected. Recent evidence indicates negligible effects of cimetidine on liver blood flow. Cimetidine reduces the renal clearance of drugs which are organic cations, by competing for active tubular secretion in the proximal tubule of the kidney, reducing the renal clearances of procainamide, ranitidine, triamterene, metformin, flecainide and the active metabolite N-acetylprocainamide. This previously unrecognised form of drug interaction with cimetidine may be clinically important for both parent drug, and metabolites which may be active.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 400 WORDS)

A chronic-dosing pharmacokinetic study was carried out in six healthy subjects to examine the potential for cimetidine to reduce the CLR and CLH of triamterene. Blood and urine samples were collected frequently for 24 hours after dosing with triamterene alone (100 mg/day) for 4 days and concomitant cimetidine (400 mg twice daily) for an additional 4 days. Cimetidine significantly reduced the clearance of triamterene by hydroxylation by 32% (P less than 0.016) and the CLR of triamterene by 28% (P less than 0.063), with no change in its protein binding. The CLR of the active sulfate conjugate of triamterene was not altered by cimetidine. There was a reduced recovery of triamterene and its metabolites in urine after cimetidine, suggesting a decreased absorption. These results are consistent with cimetidine inhibiting cytochrome P-450 enzymes in the liver and also competing with triamterene for renal tubular secretion. Despite the pharmacokinetic interaction, cimetidine caused minimal alteration to the natriuretic and antikaliuretic effects of triamterene.

1. The absorption and disposition of the potassium sparing diuretic amiloride were determined in nine elderly patients aged 71 to 87 years and in eight young (25 to 38 years) subjects following oral administration of 5 mg amiloride HCl daily to steady‐state. 2. The maximum and steady‐state plasma amiloride concentrations were significantly (P less than 0.05 and P less than 0.001) higher in the elderly patients. The renal clearance of amiloride was lower in the elderly than in young subjects (102 +/‐ 36 ml min ‐1 vs 300 +/‐ 64 ml min‐1, P less than 0.001) as was the urinary excretion of amiloride (36 +/‐ 13 vs 62 +/‐ 18% of the dose, P less than 0.01). 3. The steady‐ state plasma amiloride concentration correlated significantly (r2 = 0.61, P less than 0.001) with amiloride renal clearance and with creatinine clearance (r2 = 0.59, P less than 0.001). There was a very strong positive correlation between renal amiloride clearance and creatinine clearance (r2 = 0.76, P less than 0.001). The slope of the regression line was 2.5 indicating substantial proximal tubular secretion of amiloride. 4. Sodium and potassium excretion, along with urine volume were significantly (P less than 0.05) lower in the elderly (by 39, 45 and 34% respectively). 5. The disposition of amiloride was highly dependent on renal function, with higher plasma amiloride concentrations in the elderly reflecting diminished renal function. The dose of amiloride should be titrated to individual response, and the lower potassium excretion in the elderly patients suggests that the dose of amiloride could be reduced in this group of patients.

No abstract