ObjectiveIn this article we present a simplified algorithm-based approach to the thickening of the small and large bowel wall detected on routine computed tomography (CT) of the abdomen.BackgroundThickening of the small or large bowel wall may be caused by neoplastic, inflammatory, infectious, or ischaemic conditions. First, distinction should be made between focal and segmental or diffuse wall thickening. In cases of focal thickening further analysis of the wall symmetry and perienteric anomalies allows distinguishing between neoplasms and inflammatory conditions. In cases of segmental or diffuse thickening, the pattern of attenuation in light of clinical findings helps narrowing the differential diagnosis.ConclusionFocal bowel wall thickening may be caused by tumours or inflammatory conditions. Bowel tumours may appear as either regular and symmetric or irregular or asymmetric thickening. When fat stranding is disproportionately more severe than the degree of wall thickening, inflammatory conditions are more likely. With the exception of lymphoma, segmental or diffuse wall thickening is usually caused by benign conditions, such as ischaemic, infectious and inflammatory diseases.Key points• Thickening of the bowel wall may be focal (<5 cm) and segmental or diffuse (6-40 cm or >40 cm) in extension.• Focal, irregular and asymmetrical thickening of the bowel wall suggests a malignancy.• Perienteric fat stranding disproportionally more severe than the degree of wall thickening suggests an inflammatory condition.• Regular, symmetric and homogeneous wall thickening is more frequently due to benign conditions, but can also be caused by neoplasms such as well-differentiated adenocarcinoma and lymphoma.• Segmental or diffuse bowel wall thickening is usually caused by ischaemic, inflammatory or infectious conditions and the attenuation pattern is helpful in narrowing the differential diagnosis.

ObjectiveThis article reviews and illustrates the anatomy and pathology of the masticator space (MS).BackgroundPathology of the masticator space includes inflammatory conditions, vascular lesions, and tumours. Intrinsic tumours of this space can be benign and malignant, and they may arise from the mandibular ramus, the third division of the trigeminal nerve, or the mastication muscles. Malignant tumours may appear well defined and confined by the masticator fascia, without imaging signs of aggressive extension into neighbouring soft tissues. Secondary invasion of the masticator space can also occur with tumours of the nasopharynx, oropharynx, oral cavity, and parotid glands. Perineural tumour spread (PNS), especially along the trigeminal nerve, can also occur with masticator space malignancies.ConclusionMasses of the MS are difficult to evaluate clinically, and computed tomographic (CT) and magnetic resonance (MR) images are essential for the diagnosis and characterisation of these lesions. Malignant tumours may appear well defined and confined by the fascia. Thus, when a mass is identified, a biopsy should be done promptly. PNS may occur in tumours involving the MS and its recognition on imaging studies is essential to plan the appropriate treatment.Teaching points• Differentiating between intrinsic and extrinsic lesions is essential to the differential diagnosis• Infections of the MS may cross the fascia and mimic neoplasms on imaging studies• Malignant tumours may show no aggressive signs, such as bone erosion or violation of the fascia• Perineural spread (PNS) is often clinically silent and frequently missed at imaging and leads to tumour recurrence

RESUMODiabetes mellitus (DM) é uma doença progressiva que apresenta complicações freqüentes, em especial a infecção nos pés. Realizamos um estudo prospectivo com 141 pacientes com DM e úlceras infectadas nos pés, conduzido no Centro Integrado de Diabetes e Hipertensão da UFC no período de março/2000 a novembro/2001. A maioria apresentava infecção avaliada como graus I e II da classificação de Wagner. As amostras foram cultivadas utilizando-se meios seletivos, e a identificação bacteriana e os antibiogramas foram realizados através de metodologia convencional e automatizados. Os patógenos mais freqüentemente isolados foram as enterobactérias (83,7%), Staphylococcus aureus (43,3%) e bactérias anaeróbias (17%). Cepas de Streptococcus pyogenes foram isoladas de 7,8% dos pacientes. Cepas produtoras de beta-lactamase de espectro ampliado e cepas de Staphylococcus aureus resistentes à oxacilina foram isoladas de 6% e 11,6% dos pacientes, respectivamente. A resistência aos antimicrobianos vem se tornando cada vez mais comum, mesmo em pacientes com infecção adquirida na comunidade. Investimentos em diagnóstico etiológico das infecções e estratégias racionais no uso de antimicrobianos fazem-se necessários na tentativa de evitar tratamentos inadequados e suas já conhecidas conseqüências. In a prospective study, we analyzed 298 species of bacteria isolated from 141 patients with community-acquired diabetic foot ulcers. The study was undertaken at a diabetic center and at the Federal University of Ceará, Brazil, from March/2000 to November/2001. The majority of patients had mild to moderate infections and was classified as Wagner's grades I and II. The samples were cultured using selective media. The identification and the susceptibility tests were done by conventional and automated methods. The most frequently occurring pathogens were Enterobacteriaceae (83.7%), Staphylococcus aureus (43.3%) and anaerobic bacteria (17%). Streptococcus pyogenes was recovered from 7.8% of the patients. ESBL producing strains were detected in 6% and methicillin resistant Staphylococcus aureus strains were recovered from 11.6% of the patients. Resistance among bacteria has increased largely, and became common even in community-acquired infections. Improvements in the routine etiologic diagnostics and antibiotic use strategies are required to avoid inadequate treatment and its well known dramatic consequences.

The knowledge of this anatomic post-operative defect and a low threshold for diagnosis are crucial to its management, since its nonspecific clinical and laboratory findings. Early operative intervention is warranted in order to avoid the severe complications of bowel necrosis.

No abstract