ConclusionsThe lack of documentation and standardized practice of ps on our pcu has resulted in a quality improvement program to address those gaps. They also highlight the importance of conducting research and developing clinical guidelines in this area. KEY WORDSPalliative care, conscious sedation, deep sedation, documentation, hypnotics and sedatives BACKGROUNDPalliative sedation (ps) is the intentional, continuous use of sedative medications with the goal of reducing consciousness and relieving intolerable suffering from refractory symptoms in patients who are at end of life (that is, last hours to days) 1 . A symptom is considered refractory when all possible treatments available within a tolerable time frame and risk-benefit ratio have been tried, but have not been successful 1 . Throughout the literature, the frequency of ps ranges from 2% to 52% depending on setting, research methodology, and definition 2 . Studies show that, when appropriately administered, ps does not invariably hasten death 3 . It is an essential therapy that is ethically justifiable when used appropriately with the intention of relieving intolerable suffering and not shortening life [4][5][6] . Common indications for ps include intractable delirium, dyspnea, seizures, and severe pain 2,7 . Controversial indications that have to be evaluated on an individual basis include sedation for psychological or existential suffering 3,8 . Midazolam, administered by continuous infusion, is the drug of choice for ps 1,2,7 . Other medications include methotrimeprazine and phenobarbital 2,9 .Over the last several years, ps has appropriately received increasing attention, and national and international guidelines have been developed to guide ABSTRACT Background
BackgroundThe use of Next-Generation Sequencing (NGS) has recently allowed significant improvements in cancer treatment. Foundation Medicine® (FM) provides a genomic profiling test based on NGS for a variety of cancers. However, it is unclear if the Foundation Medicine test would result in a better outcome than the standard on-site molecular testing. In this retrospective chart review, we identified the FM cases from an academic Canadian hospital and determined whether these test results improved treatment options for those patients.Materials and MethodsA retrospective analysis was performed on patients with solid tumors who had FM testing between May 1, 2014 and May 1, 2018. Clinical factors and outcomes were measured using descriptive statistics using Microsoft Excel® Software.ResultsOut of 66 FM tests, eight patients (= 12%) had a direct change in therapy based on the FM tests. Identified were 285 oncogenic mutations (median 1, range 0–31); where TP53 (n = 31, 10.9%), CDKN2A (n = 19, 6.7%), KRAS (n = 16, 5.6%) and APC (n = 9, 3.2%) were the most common FM mutations identified.ConclusionA small proportion of FM reports identified actionable mutations and led to direct treatment change. FM testing is expensive and a few of the identified mutations are now part of routine on-site testing. NGS testing is likely to become more widespread, but this research suggests that its true clinical impact may be restricted to a minority of patients.
Background: Non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) commonly presents at advanced stage. We previously reported systemic treatment uptake in stage IV NSCLC climbing from 55% (2009–2012) to 62% (2015–2017). Since then, first-line immunotherapy and 2nd/3rd generation tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) have emerged as standards of care. We explored whether treatment rates continued to rise and studied outcomes. Methods: We reviewed all cases of de novo stage IIIB/IIIC/IV NSCLC seen in out-patient medical oncology consultation at our institution between 2009–2012 (cohort A), 2015–2017 (cohort B), and June–December 2018 (cohort C). We compared rates of systemic treatment, molecular testing, targeted therapy, and immune checkpoint inhibitor (ICI) use. We compared survival in the overall, treated/untreated, younger and elderly population in cohort A vs. cohort B + C (=cohort D). Results: Cohorts A, B, and C included 528, 463, and 93 patients, respectively. Overall, 66% received any systemic therapy in cohort C, compared to 62% in cohort B and 55% in cohort A. Across three time periods, first-line chemotherapy rates fell (93, 76, 46%) while rates of first-line targeted therapy (5, 16, 15%) and ICI (0, 2, 36%) rose. Among molecular subtypes, first-line targeted treatment in EGFR-positive patients (63, 94, 100%) and anaplastic lymphoma kinase (ALK)-positive patients (0, 91, 100%) rose. Survival improved in all subgroups in cohort D vs. cohort A, except for patients ≥ 70 years and the untreated population. Conclusions: Systemic treatment rose across three time periods, reflecting the introduction of rapid diagnostic pathways, reflex molecular testing, ICI, and targeted therapies. Survival outcomes of advanced NSCLC patients have significantly improved.
Background: We performed a large-scale, retrospective, nationwide, cohort study of the incidence of brain metastasis in patients with advanced non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) according to the systemic treatment administered. Method: The data were extracted from the Health Insurance Review and Assessment Service of Korea database from January 1, 2011 to November 30, 2016. Of the 29,224 patients newly diagnosed with stage IIIB or IV NSCLC who received first-line cytotoxic chemotherapy (CC group) or targeted therapy (TT group), 22,508 patients without brain metastasis were analyzed. Result: In total, 1,131 (5.0%) patients subsequently developed brain metastasis. The overall cumulative incidence of brain metastasis was significantly higher in the TT group than in the CC group (1-year cumulative incidence: 8.7 ± 0.6% vs. 3.8 ± 0.3%; 3-year: 17.2 ± 0.7% vs. 5.0 ± 0.3%, respectively; P <0.001), despite the higher rate of brain metastasis in the CC group at <3 years after diagnosis. Younger age, female sex, living in a rural area, anticoagulant use, and first-line TT (relative risk, 2.17 ± 0.03; 95% confidence interval, 1.92e2.50, P <0.0001) retained significant associations with subsequent brain metastasis after adjusting for all variables. Conclusion: In the Korean population, the overall cumulative incidence of brain metastasis was significantly higher in patients in the TT group than in those in the CC group; the former could be regarded as having mutations in the EGFR or ALK gene.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
hi@scite.ai
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
Copyright © 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.