Acute gastrointestinal bleeding is a common reason for emergency department admissions and an important cause of morbidity and mortality. Factors that complicate its clinical management include patient debility due to comorbidities; intermittence of hemorrhage; and multiple sites of simultaneous bleeding. Its management, therefore, must be multidisciplinary and include emergency physicians, gastroenterologists, and surgeons, as well as radiologists for diagnostic imaging and interventional therapy. Upper gastrointestinal tract bleeding is usually managed endoscopically, with radiologic intervention reserved as an alternative to be used if endoscopic therapy fails. Endoscopy is often less successful in the management of acute lower gastrointestinal tract bleeding, where colonoscopy may be more effective. The merits of performing bowel cleansing before colonoscopy in such cases might be offset by the resultant increase in response time and should be weighed carefully against the deficits in visualization and diagnostic accuracy that would result from performing colonoscopy without bowel preparation. In recent years, multidetector computed tomographic (CT) angiography has gained acceptance as a first-line option for the diagnosis and management of lower gastrointestinal tract bleeding. In selected cases of upper gastrointestinal tract bleeding, CT angiography also provides accurate information about the presence or absence of active bleeding, its source, and its cause. This information helps shorten the total diagnostic time and minimizes or eliminates the need for more expensive and more invasive procedures.

CT angiography performed in the emergency setting in patients with acute lower intestinal bleeding is feasible and correctly depicts the presence and location of active or recent hemorrhage, as well as the potential cause, in the majority of patients.

Aneurysmal diseases of the thoracic aorta are life-threatening conditions. In such cases, stent-graft treatment has been proposed as an alternative to surgery. The morbidity and mortality associated with endovascular repair are significantly lower than those associated with open surgery. In the largest surgical series, the mortality ranged from 5% to 20%. In studies of endovascular repair, the 30-day mortality was 0%-20% and the periprocedural stroke rate was 0%-7%. Often, open surgery is prohibited in patients with these high-risk lesions; thus, in many cases endovascular treatment is the only alternative. Thoracic aortic diseases that can be treated with endovascular stent-graft placement include aneurysms, dissection, traumatic rupture, traumatic pseudoaneurysms, intramural hematoma, penetrating atherosclerotic ulcers, and aortic rupture. Thorough preprocedure imaging is essential for selecting patients, choosing the stent-graft devices, and planning the intervention. Prerequisites for endovascular stent-graft placement are an adequate neck for graft attachment and adequate vascular access. When the ascending aorta or aortic arch is involved, surgical and endovascular procedures can be combined and performed simultaneously, allowing treatment of a wider range of cases. An experienced interdisciplinary team is needed to manage such cases.

No abstract