European Society of Anaesthesiology.

SummaryA decrease in serum albumin concentrations is an almost inevitable finding in disease states, and is primarily mediated in the acute phase by alterations in vascular permeability and redistribution. This change is not disease specific but marked changes that persist are generally associated with a poorer prognosis. Critical appraisal of long-standing practices and the availability of alternative colloid solutions have led to a reduction in albumin replacement therapy, and a widespread tolerance of lower albumin concentrations in patients. The factors determining serum albumin concentrations, their measurement and the implications of hypoalbuminaemia are reviewed. The clinical value of serum albumin measurement is discussed. Serum albumin is routinely measured and reported in almost every hospital. The measurement is interpreted and acted upon in a wide range of circumstances. In this review we shall address how serum albumin is measured, what the measurement means and the clinical implications and uses of this commonly derived value.In order to understand the issues better, we shall first focus on the physiology involved in the maintenance of serum albumin concentrations, that is the pharmacokinetics, functions and metabolism of endogenous albumin in the normal subject. Secondly, we shall discuss the measurement of serum albumin and the limitations of currently used measurement techniques. We shall then review the mechanisms by which serum albumin concentrations decrease and the 'pathophysiology' of albumin in a number of disease states. Lastly, we shall discuss the interpretation of low values, including their diagnostic and prognostic significance, and the role of albumin supplementation in clinical practice.The traditional term serum albumin will be used throughout, although many people refer to plasma albumin, and the terms are loosely interchangeable. Serum is the term accurately used to describe what is left after a clot has formed in a blood specimen; this fluid is deficient in clotting proteins and, hence, has differing total protein content and colloid osmotic pressures from plasma. The difference in albumin concentrations is negligible, but many laboratories currently perform analyses on nonclotted blood samples, and thus measure plasma albumin.

IMPORTANCE An intraoperative higher level of positive end-expiratory positive pressure (PEEP) with alveolar recruitment maneuvers improves respiratory function in obese patients undergoing surgery, but the effect on clinical outcomes is uncertain. OBJECTIVE To determine whether a higher level of PEEP with alveolar recruitment maneuvers decreases postoperative pulmonary complications in obese patients undergoing surgery compared with a lower level of PEEP. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS Randomized clinical trial of 2013 adults with body mass indices of 35 or greater and substantial risk for postoperative pulmonary complications who were undergoing noncardiac, nonneurological surgery under general anesthesia. The trial was conducted at 77 sites in 23 countries from July 2014-February 2018; final follow-up: May 2018. INTERVENTIONS Patients were randomized to the high level of PEEP group (n = 989), consisting of a PEEP level of 12 cm H 2 O with alveolar recruitment maneuvers (a stepwise increase of tidal volume and eventually PEEP) or to the low level of PEEP group (n = 987), consisting of a PEEP level of 4 cm H 2 O. All patients received volume-controlled ventilation with a tidal volume of 7 mL/kg of predicted body weight. MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES The primary outcome was a composite of pulmonary complications within the first 5 postoperative days, including respiratory failure, acute respiratory distress syndrome, bronchospasm, new pulmonary infiltrates, pulmonary infection, aspiration pneumonitis, pleural effusion, atelectasis, cardiopulmonary edema, and pneumothorax. Among the 9 prespecified secondary outcomes, 3 were intraoperative complications, including hypoxemia (oxygen desaturation with SpO 2 Յ92% for >1 minute). RESULTS Among 2013 adults who were randomized, 1976 (98.2%) completed the trial (mean age, 48.8 years; 1381 [69.9%] women; 1778 [90.1%] underwent abdominal operations). In the intention-to-treat analysis, the primary outcome occurred in 211 of 989 patients (21.3%) in the high level of PEEP group compared with 233 of 987 patients (23.6%) in the low level of PEEP group (difference, −2.3% [95% CI, −5.9% to 1.4%]; risk ratio, 0.93 [95% CI, 0.83 to 1.04]; P = .23). Among the 9 prespecified secondary outcomes, 6 were not significantly different between the high and low level of PEEP groups, and 3 were significantly different, including fewer patients with hypoxemia (5.0% in the high level of PEEP group vs 13.6% in the low level of PEEP group; difference, −8.6% [95% CI, −11.1% to 6.1%]; P < .001). CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE Among obese patients undergoing surgery under general anesthesia, an intraoperative mechanical ventilation strategy with a higher level of PEEP and alveolar recruitment maneuvers, compared with a strategy with a lower level of PEEP, did not reduce postoperative pulmonary complications.

No abstract

SummaryGuidelines are presented for the organisational and clinical peri‐operative management of anaesthesia and surgery for patients who are obese, along with a summary of the problems that obesity may cause peri‐operatively. The advice presented is based on previously published advice, clinical studies and expert opinion.