The present study aimed to investigate the factor structure and degree of measurement invariance of a Spanish adaptation of the Abbreviated Math Anxiety Scale (AMAS) in primary and secondary school students ( N = 1,504 students, 46.08% males, 7-19 years of age). The results of confirmatory factor analysis corroborated the original two-factor structure, although a modified two-factor model with one item loading simultaneously on both factors was better supported. Full measurement invariance was observed across gender, and partial measurement invariance was achieved across educational levels (primary and secondary education). The AMAS showed reasonable internal consistency, test–retest reliability, and convergent validity. These results highlight the utility of the AMAS as a measure of math anxiety in primary and secondary school students whose scores can be compared by gender and educational level.
There were intergroup differences and discrepancies between the direct performance and indirect measures in children with ASD, and these must be explained. For this reason, future studies could seek to explain the cause of these discrepancies with a greater number of measures for each of the skills.
Resumen La exclusión social es uno de los mayores desafíos de las sociedades modernas especialmente para una de las poblaciones más afectadas: la infancia. Crecer en ambientes desfavorecidos tiene un impacto negativo en la salud, la educación o el desarrollo cognitivo, emocional y social. Una de las áreas especialmente afectadas en estos niños es la competencia social, entendida como la habilidad del sujeto para enfrentarse a situaciones sociales problemáticas de forma exitosa. Este trabajo se centra en las habilidades de resolución de problemas interpersonales, consideradas componentes fundamentales de la competencia social. El objetivo del estudio ha consistido en determinar si la implementación de un programa de entrenamiento en habilidades de resolución de problemas interpersonales consigue mejorar dichas habilidades en niños en situación de exclusión social a través de un diseño cuasi-experimental pre-post-tratamiento. Los participantes han sido 61 niños de 7 a 12 años de los cuales 34 se sitúan en situación de exclusión. Los resultados muestran mejoras en la habilidad de generar soluciones a los conflictos y en solución de problemas interpersonales. De los resultados se concluye que el programa genera mejoras en las habilidades entrenadas en niños en situación de exclusión. No obstante, se hace necesario seguir investigando el impacto de las intervenciones breves en esta población.Abstract Social exclusion is one of the biggest challenges of modern societies especially for one of the most affected populations: children. Growing up in disadvantaged environments has a negative impact on health, education or cognitive, emotional and social development. One area particularly affected in these children is social competence -the subject's ability to deal with problematic social situations successfully. This work focuses on interpersonal problem-solving skills, which are deemed as being quintessential components of social competence. This paper sought to Resolución de problemas interpersonales en niños en exclusión social: Valoración de un programa de entrenamiento
Situations generated by high family risk have a negative effect on personal development, especially during preadolescence. Growing up in the presence of risk factors can lead to negative consequences on mental health or on school performance. The objective of this study focuses on individual factors related to this phenomenon during preadolescence. Specifically, we seek to establish whether level of family risk (high vs. low risk) is related to interpersonal problem-solving skills, executive function and learning potential in a sample of preadolescents controlling age, sex, total IQ, verbal comprehension ability and the classroom influences. The participants were 40 children, 23 boys and 17 girls between the ages of 7 and 12, twenty of which had a record on file with the Social and Childhood Protection Services of Information deleted to maintain the integrity of the review process, and therefore, a high family risk situation. The other 20 participants had a low family risk situation. Results show that the preadolescents from high family risk performed worse on interpersonal solving-problem skills and executive function (p < .05, b from -119,201.81 to 132,199.43, confidence interval from -162,589.78/-75,813.8 to 84,403.05/179,995.8). Nevertheless, they showed the same ability to learn as the participants from low family risk. These results highlight the negative effects of high family risk situation in preadolescents and give value of taking into account protective factors such as learning potential when assessing preadolescents from high family risk.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.