No abstract

Groenen PÀP, Makhdouni M, van den Brink JL, Stoll man MHP, Snik AFM, vtin den Broek P, The relation between electric auditory brain stem and cognitive responses and speech perception in cochlear implant users. Acta Otolaryngol (Stockh) 1996; 116: 785-790. Electrically evoked brainstem responses (EABR) and event-related cortical potentials were recorded in seven postlingually deaf adults who were experienced users of a Nuclcus multichannel cochlear implant. The patients were divided into two subgroups: good performers and moderate performers, Poor EABR were found in two of the moderate performers. The latencies and amplitudes of the cortical N1-P2 complex in the good performers were within the same range as those of subjects with normal hearing, but were deviant in the group of moderate performers. This may indicate disturbed cochleotopical organization of the auditory cortex in the latter group. P300 measurements in the good performers showed normal latencies, whereas in the moderate performers they were prolonged. The results suggest that the outcomes of electrophysiological measurements to assess the integrity of a patient's auditory neural system on a brainstem and. a cortical level, are related to the patient's performance with the cochlear implant.

Several electrophysiological techniques have been used to supplement behavioural measurements in the evaluation of the benefit of cochlear implantation, namely the electrically evoked auditory brainstem response (EABR), electrically evoked middle latency response (EMLR) and electrically evoked late latency response (EALR). To study the interdependence of these responses, the present paper deals with a combination of EABR, EMLR and EALR measurements obtained from 15 postlingually deaf subjects implanted with the Nucleus multichannel device at the University Hospital Nijmegen. In particular, we investigated whether there were intercorrelations between amplitude and latencies of the evoked potential peaks and/or correlations with long-term speech perception scores. Significant correlations were found between the peak V amplitude of the EABR and the NaPa and NbPb amplitudes of the EMLR. No significant correlation was found between the EABR and EMLR amplitudes on the one hand and EALR peak amplitudes on the other. In addition, no significant correlations were found between any of the EABR or EMLR peak amplitudes and speech perception test results. A moderate but significant relation was found between the EALR peak amplitude and speech perception test results. Unlike latencies of earlier peaks, the latency of the EALR peak P2 was significantly related to the speech perception scores.

To investigate whether electrically evoked event-related responses (P300) could be elicited by extra-cochlear stimulation, measurements were performed on a group of adults fitted with the single-channel extra-cochlear implant. To optimize measurement conditions, and because of the low number of subjects still using an extra-cochlear device in our cochlear implant programme, measurements were also performed on a group of experienced users fitted with the intra-cochlear Nucleus multichannel device. For reference purposes, subjects with normal hearing (control group) were also included in the study. Reproducible late latency responses (N1 and P2 peaks) were found in the five extra-cochlear implant users, while P300s were present in four out of these five subjects. The latencies were longer than those of the control group, but were similar to those obtained in the intra-cochlear implant group. Significant correlations were found for most N1, P2 and P300 measurements evoked by the tonal stimuli and by speech stimuli. The P300 amplitudes, evoked by either tonal or speech stimuli, appeared to be related to speech perception ability. This led to the conclusion that N1, P2 and P300 measurements may have potential as a clinical tool for preoperative prediction and postoperative evaluation of sound processing on a cortical level.

The field of cochlear implantation is developing rapidly. In subjects with bilateral profound deafness who gain no benefit from conventional hearing aids the aim of cochlear implantation is to provide a means for them to receive auditory sensations. Throughout the world, most cochlear implant centres are still continuing their research efforts to improve the results with this technique. Although it is still difficult to predict how an individual will perform with a cochlear implant, the success of cochlear implantation can no longer be denied. In this paper, we review some recent papers and reports, and the results of the various Nijmegen cochlear implant studies. Data about subject selection, examinations, surgery and the outcome are discussed. Our results were in good agreement with those of other authors. It can be concluded once again that cochlear implantation is an effective treatment for postlingually deaf adults and children, and for prelingually (congenital or acquired) deaf children with profound bilateral sensorineural deafness.