In order to evaluate in vivo the entity of endosteal and periosteal changes with age in the two sexes, and their relative contribution to age-related cortical bone loss, we undertook a cross-sectional study on a population of normal Caucasian subjects. The group included 189 women and 107 men who were studied by photodensitometry and radiogrammetry of the second metacarpal bone, derived from the same standard hand X-ray. Of the subjects, 134 were 65 years of age or older (75 women and 59 men). Metacarpal bone mineral density (BMD) correlated with age in both sexes, with an annual bone loss rate of 0.5% in women and 0.15% in men. In the over 65 group, correlation was significant only in women, who underwent an acceleration in the rate of bone loss (1% per year). Marrow cavity width (M), cortical index at the second metacarpal shaft (MI) and external width (W) all correlated with age in both sexes, although generally better in the female than in the male sex. M almost doubled from the fourth to the ninth decade in women and increased 50% in men. In the same age interval, MI showed an annual decrease of 0.49% in females and 0.33% in males. In the over 65 group, cortical thinning rate was significant in women (0.39% per annum) but not in men (0.14% per annum), whereas correlation of W was not significant in either sex. Finally, MI correlated with BMD in the whole study population and in the over 65, with a female prevalence in correlation strength maintained throughout life. The following conclusions can be derived for metacarpal aging: (1) an acceleration in cortical bone loss occurs in females after age 65; (2) age-related growth in periosteal diameter, although significant in the whole population, is negligible in the elderly of both sexes; (3) age-related cortical bone loss is generally more dependent on cortical thinning in women than in men.
Previous studies have demonstrated that an Sp1 binding site polymorphism in the collagen type I gene (COLIA1) is related to reduced bone mineral density (BMD) and osteoporotic fractures in certain populations, particularly in the elderly. We have examined the relationship among these COLIA1 Sp1 alleles, BMD, quantitative ultrasound properties of bone, and fractures in a population-based cohort of elderly women from the UK. The study group comprised 314 women aged 75 years and over who agreed to participate in a clinical study of bisphosphonate therapy in preventing bone loss at the hip. Women were enrolled regardless of the presence or absence of osteoporosis, but those with other diseases that might affect skeletal metabolism were excluded. The genotype distribution for the Sp1 polymorphism was in Hardy-Weinberg equilibrium (SS - 78%; Ss - 20%; ss - 2%) but the proportion of individuals who carried the "s" allele (22%) was significantly lower than previously observed in another study of the UK population (37.1%) (P < 0.001). There were no significant associations between COLIA1 genotypes and metacarpal cortical index, BMD of the forearm, tibial SOS, calcaneal SOS, or calcaneal BUA. While there was a trend towards lower BMD values at the hip in patients with Ss and ss genotypes, this was not statistically significant (SS = 0.721 +/- 0.14; Ss = 0.704 +/- 0.13; ss = 0.683 +/- 0.20 P = 0.6). Prevalent vertebral fractures occurred in 22% of subjects and prior fractures of the wrist, ankle, and hip were reported by 20%, but there was no significant difference in COLIA1 genotype distribution between fracture patients and controls. We conclude that COLIA1 Sp1 alleles are not significantly associated with BMD, ultrasound properties of bone, or fractures in this population-based sample of elderly women.
The questionnaire intercepted the influence of osteoporosis on the quality of life of elderly women with vertebral fractures. Subjects who suffered from severe pain and were more fearful of falling were most likely to be severely osteoporotic.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
hi@scite.ai
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
Copyright © 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.