Metacognition refers to the capacity to reflect upon our own cognitive processes and its contribution to learning and academic achievement remains subject to ongoing debate. However, little is known about its developmental trajectories when children begin to receive formal education in reading. Here, we evaluate the metacognitive efficiency of children aged between 6 and 7 years old (N=60) in four reading-related linguistic discrimination tasks and one non-linguistic task unrelated to reading skills. First, we investigated how metacognition on these tasks related to performance measured in standardized reading tests and to sensitivity indexes in the reading-related linguistic tasks. Second, we assessed whether these developing readers recruited common metacognitive mechanisms across the different task domains. Third, we explored whether metacognition in this early stage was related to the longitudinal improvement in performance in a linguistic and a non-linguistic task. No association was found between students’ metacognition in the reading-related linguistic tasks and performance on the standardized reading tests, notwithstanding performance correlated across these tasks. We found some evidence consistent with shared metacognitive mechanisms monitoring performance across tasks. Remarkably, metacognitive ability significantly predicted children’s performance improvement across domains a year later. These results suggest that the development of metacognitive processing may be dissociated to some extent from reading-related linguistic abilities and non-linguistic abilities during the early stages of formal education. Nevertheless, it may play a fundamental role in guiding students' learning across domains. These data highlight the importance of creating educational programs fostering students’ metacognition as a long-term learning tool.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
hi@scite.ai
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
Copyright © 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.