No abstract

The terms pull and lean production have become cornerstones of modern manufacturing practice. However, although they are widely used, they are less widely understood. In this paper, we argue that while the academic literature has steadily revealed the richness of the pull/lean concepts, the practitioner literature has progressively simplified these terms to the point that serious misunderstandings now exist. In hopes of reducing confusion, we offer general, but precise definitions of pull and lean. Specifically, we argue that pull is essentially a mechanism for limiting WIP, and lean is fundamentally about minimizing the cost of buffering variability.

Concerns about American manufacturing competitiveness compel new interest in alternative production control strategies. In this paper, we examine the behavior of push and pull production systems in an attempt to explain the apparent superior performance of pull systems. We consider three conjectures: that pull systems have less congestion; that pull systems are inherently easier to control; and that the benefits of a pull environment owe more to the fact that WIP is bounded than to the practice of “pulling” everywhere. We examine these conjectures for analytically tractable models. In doing so, we not only find supporting evidence for our surmises but also identify a control strategy that has push and pull characteristics and appears to outperform both pure push and pure pull systems. This hybrid system also appears to be more general in its applicability than traditional pull systems such as Kanban.

No abstract

No abstract