Heat stress is detrimental to dairy production and affects numerous variables including feed intake and milk production. It is unclear, however, whether decreased milk yield is primarily due to the associated reduction in feed intake or the cumulative effects of heat stress on feed intake, metabolism, and physiology of dairy cattle. To distinguish between direct (not mediated by feed intake) and indirect (mediated by feed intake) effects of heat stress on physiological and metabolic indices, Holstein cows (n = 6) housed in thermal neutral conditions were pair-fed (PF) to match the nutrient intake of heat-stressed cows (HS; n = 6). All cows were subjected to 2 experimental periods: 1) thermal neutral and ad libitum intake for 9 d (P1) and 2) HS or PF for 9 d (P2). Heat-stress conditions were cyclical with daily temperatures ranging from 29.7 to 39.2 degrees C. During P1 and P2 all cows received i.v. challenges of epinephrine (d 6 of each period), and growth hormone releasing factor (GRF; d 7 of each period), and had circulating somatotropin (ST) profiles characterized (every 15 min for 6 h on d 8 of each period). During P2, HS cows were hyperthermic for the entire day and peak differences in rectal temperatures and respiration rates occurred in the afternoon (38.7 to 40.2 degrees C and 46 to 82 breaths/min, respectively). Heat stress decreased dry matter intake by greater than 35% and, by design, PF cows had similar reduced intakes. Heat stress and PF decreased milk yield, although the pattern and magnitude (40 and 21%, respectively) differed between treatments. The reduction in dry matter intake caused by HS accounted for only approximately 35% of the decrease in milk production. Both HS and PF cows entered into negative energy balance, but only PF cows had increased (approximately 120%) basal nonesterified fatty acid (NEFA) concentrations. Both PF and HS cows had decreased (7%) plasma glucose levels. The NEFA response to epinephrine did not differ between treatments but was increased (greater than 50%) in all cows during P2. During P2, HS (but not PF) cows had a modest reduction (16%) in plasma insulin-like growth factor-I. Neither treatment nor period had an effect on the ST response to GRF and there was little or no treatment effect on mean ST levels or pulsatility characteristics, but both HS and PF cows had reduced mean ST concentrations during P2. In summary, reduced nutrient intake accounted for just 35% of the HS-induced decrease in milk yield, and modest changes in the somatotropic axis may have contributed to a portion of the remainder. Differences in basal NEFA between PF and HS cows suggest a shift in postabsorptive metabolism and nutrient partitioning that may explain the additional reduction in milk yield in cows experiencing a thermal load.
Multiparous, lactating Holstein cows (n = 23; 120 +/- 30 d in milk, 690 +/- 67 kg of body weight) housed in climatic chambers were randomly assigned to 1 of 2 dietary treatments: a diet containing a novel yeast culture formulation (YC) for heat stress (n = 12, 10 g/d) or a control diet (n = 11). The trial length was 28 d and consisted of a 7-d thermal neutral period (TN; 18 degrees C, 20% humidity) followed by 21 d of heat stress (HS; cyclical daily temperatures ranging from 29.4 to 37.8 degrees C and 20% humidity). Cows were individually fed a total mixed ration consisting primarily of alfalfa hay and steam-flaked corn. During TN, the YC feeding had no effect on production variables or most body temperature indices. During HS, all body temperature indices increased and YC had no effect on rump surface temperature, respiration rate, or sweating rates. Cows fed YC had lower rectal temperatures at 1200 and 1800 h (40.29 vs. 40.02 degrees C and 40.35 vs. 40.12 +/- 0.07 degrees C, respectively) compared with control-fed cows. Cows fed both diets lost body weight (42 kg) during HS, but there were no differences between diets. Control-fed cows had increased dry matter intake (DMI) and milk yield (19.1 vs. 17.9 +/- 0.5 kg/d and 32.15 vs. 29.15 +/- 0.02 kg/d, respectively) compared with YC-fed cows, but intake and milk production were similar between diets when evaluated on a body weight basis. Heat stress progressively decreased DMI (29%) and milk yield, with milk production reaching a nadir (33%) in the third week. Heat stress decreased milk protein (7%) and lactose (5%) levels, but did not alter milk fat content. Heat-stressed cows were in calculated negative energy balance (-1.91 +/- 0.70 Mcal/d) and this was unaffected by diet. Independent of diet, HS decreased plasma glucose (11%), but neither diet nor HS altered basal nonesterified fatty acid levels. Heat stress increased plasma urea N concentrations (11.5 vs. 14.8 +/- 0.4 mg/dL). Despite YC-fed cows having slightly reduced body temperatures indices, feeding YC did not prevent the negative effects of HS.
Heat stress (HS) is a multibillion-dollar problem for the global dairy industry, and reduced milk yield is the primary contributor to this annual economic loss. Feed intake declines precipitously during HS but accounts for only about 35% of the decreased milk synthesis, indicating that the physiological mechanisms responsible for decreased milk production during HS are only partly understood. Thus, our experimental objectives were to characterize the direct effects of HS on the somatotropic axis, a primary regulator of metabolism and milk yield. We recently reported no differences in mean growth hormone (GH) concentrations, GH pulsatility characteristics, or GH response to growth hormone releasing factor in HS versus pair-fed (PF) thermoneutral controls. Despite similarities in circulating GH characteristics, plasma insulin-like growth factor (IGF)-I concentrations were reduced during heat stress conditions but not in PF animals, suggesting that uncoupling of the hepatic GH-IGF axis may occur during HS. We investigated this possibility by measuring proximal indicators of hepatic GH signaling following a GH bolus. Heat stress but not PF decreased abundance of the GH receptor and GH-dependent signal transducer and activator of transcription (STAT)-5 phosphorylation. Consistent with reduced GH signaling through STAT-5, basal hepatic IGF-I mRNA abundance was lower in HS cows. Thus, the reduced hepatic GH responsiveness (in terms of IGF-I gene expression) observed during HS appears to involve mechanisms at least partially independent of reduced nutrient intake. The physiological significance of reduced hepatic GH receptor abundance during HS is unclear at this time. Aside from reducing IGF-I production, it may reduce other GH-sensitive bioenergetic processes such as gluconeogenesis.
The somatotropic axis consisting of growth hormone, the growth hormone receptor (GHR) insulin-like growth factor (IGF)-I, and IGF binding proteins changes with the stage of lactation and nutrition of the cow and may be 1 mechanism through which lactation and nutrition affect the establishment of pregnancy. The objective of this study was to quantify GHR, IGF-I, and IGF binding protein-2 (IGFBP-2) mRNA in liver and uterine endometrial tissue at 4 stages of lactation (40, 80, 120, and 160 days in milk) and around the time of artificial insemination. Estrus was synchronized with GnRH and PGF2alpha, and cows were inseminated 12 h after estrus. Uterine biopsies were collected immediately before the second injection of PGF2alpha (before estrus), at the initiation of standing estrus, and 4 d after estrus. Liver biopsies were collected once on 4 d after estrus. The abundance of GHR, IGF-I, and IGFBP-2 mRNA in liver and uterus was determined by real-time quantitative PCR. The amount of liver IGF-I mRNA was positively correlated with plasma IGF-I concentrations. Cows that became pregnant after AI had more GHR and IGFBP-2 mRNA in their liver than cows that did not become pregnant. There was no effect of DIM or pregnancy status on abundance of uterine mRNA; however, uterine GHR and IGF-I mRNA was most abundant at estrus. In summary, cows at different stages of lactation or with different pregnancy statuses had similar quantities of uterine mRNA. In contrast, liver quantities of mRNA differed relative to pregnancy status. These data provide evidence that liver indices of metabolic state may be indicative of pregnancy success.
Uterine secretions are crucial for conceptus development in mammals. This is especially important for species that undergo extended preimplantation development, like cattle and other ungulates. The present study examined cooperative interactions for epidermal growth factor (EGF), fibroblast growth factor-2 (FGF2) and insulin-like growth factor-1 (IGF1) on the proliferation of the bovine trophoblast cell line CT1 and bovine embryo development. Proliferation of CT1 cells increased after supplementation of the culture medium with 10ngmL EGF, 10ngmL FGF2 or 50ngmL IGF1, as well as with any combination of two factors. Greater increases in CT1 cell proliferation were detected when the growth medium was supplemented with all three factors. Supplementing the culture medium with individual or multiple factors during bovine embryo culture resulted in several positive outcomes, including increased blastocyst development, expansion, and hatching to varying degrees depending on the particular factor or combination of factors. Supplementation of the culture medium with all three factors increased embryonic trophoblast cell numbers on Day 8, as well as hatching rates and blastocyst diameter on Day 12 after fertilisation. Western blot analyses and the use of pharmacological inhibitors suggest that EGF and IGF1 affect CT1 proliferation by activating mitogen-activated protein kinase 3/1, whereas FGF2 activates AKT. In conclusion, the findings of the present study indicate that there are cooperative interactions among EGF, FGF2 and IGF1 that enhance trophoblast cell development during early embryogenesis.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
hi@scite.ai
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
Copyright © 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.