Field development planning for an asset requires close interaction between different domains and departments, to reduce any potential uncertainties within the studied asset. Reducing uncertainties is crucial in investment preparation for a new green field development. By adopting an integrated asset approach, such cross-department interactions can be further improved by breaking down the barriers and assembling an integrated asset team with a common goal. This paper summarizes the construction of an integrated asset study for an offshore green field and compares the study against those obtained from the standalone-domain models. In this study, a reservoir simulation model was coupled to the wells and network models, which were further integrated to the processing facilities models and the asset economics evaluation model.The aim of the study was to evaluate an existing field development plan (based on the traditional standalone approach) with an integrated asset approach to identify any possible constraints and potential deviations, enabling proactive actions to be taken on the asset management for future operations. The work presented here encompasses the use of various numerical simulation software applications working together in a single simulation environment, which allowed sensitivity analysis on different elements of the asset and evaluation of any possible impacts among the studied elements, such as manifold choke sizing and gas lifting parameters.This assessment consists of a study from reservoir to economics, taking into account of wells, pipelines, surface equipment, production networks and downstream process facilities. The study demonstrated any components of the production network system and topside operating condition could impose constraints on the reservoir deliverability. Apart from evaluating various operating scenarios to best utilize the emerging capacity and to investigate back-out efforts and other challenges during the field development, it also provided guidance on how to further optimize the production system in terms of finding choke sizes over time and adjusting gas lift injection according to gas availability and operating pressure constraint. With its integrated asset approach, this study also presented a base case that could be extended with inclusion of gas lift distribution system to enable a more comprehensive analysis and asset field development study.
CO2 emissions are considered to be the main contributor to global warming and climate change. One of the ways reducing the emissions to atmosphere is a proper capture and further geological storage of the carbon dioxide. In the oil industry, CO2 is used as one of the injection agents to displace oil and enhance its recovery. Due to the low multi-contact miscibility pressure between CO2 and hydrocarbons, fully miscible condition is quickly reached, leading to efficient displacement and high recovery factors. The utilization of the depleted gas fields for CO2 storage, however, is considered as the option that is more expensive compared to oil field, since the enhanced recovery of gas with CO2 is not effective. For this reason, our study considers the potential use of CO2 EOR in depleted gas-condensate fields. This potential is evaluated by performing numerical simulations for the typical-size gascondensate reservoirs with no active aquifer, in order to estimate both the storage efficiency and the additional oil recovery from condensed C5+ hydrocarbon fractions, that otherwise will be never recovered and lost in the reservoir. Obtained results indicate significant potential for CO2 storage and additional condensate recovery from the typical gas-condensate field of Eastern Ukraine.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.