The aim of this study was to investigate the potential clinical relevance of testing bite force endurance in patients with articular temporomandibular disorders. The endurance of a 50 N bite force was measured in 51 patients with painful temporomandibular joint disorders. The results were compared to those of a control group of 20 subjects. The force exerted was sustained until this task could not be continued because of intolerable pain or fatigue. The endurance test was repeated following therapy. Testing bite force endurance could be reliably carried out (paired t-test not significant, product-moment correlation coefficient 0.87). The mean endurance time in the patient group was significantly different from that of the control group (t = 7.43, df = 69, P < 0.01). The 95% confidence intervals for patients and controls did not show any overlap. No difference in endurance time between diagnostic subgroups could be detected (F = 1.30, df = 4,46, P < 0.28). Following treatment, all patients showed a significant increase of endurance time (t = 8.09, df = 50, P < 0.01) and reported a decrease in post-test pain. The mean difference between pre- and post-treatment endurance was 60s. Subjects of the control group stopped the biting effort predominantly because of muscle fatigue. By contrast, the main reason of the patients to cease the effort was TMJ pain. The results of this study indicate that the discriminatory power of the test is sufficient to justify its utility as a complementary tool in assessing the functional capacity of the masticatory system.
A potentially dangerous situation arises when an individual bites on hard and brittle food which suddenly breaks, since the impact velocity of the lower teeth onto the upper teeth after the food is broken can be high and may cause dental damage. The present experiments were designed to study the magnitude of the impact velocity after a sudden unloading at various initial bite forces, degrees of mouth opening, and distances of travel. Subjects were asked to perform a static biting task during which the resistance to the bite was suddenly removed. The upward mandible movement was arrested after a certain distance. The velocity of the lower teeth at impact was calculated just before the mandible came to a standstill in combinations of 4 different bite forces (100, 80, 60, and 40 N), 4 different initial degrees of mouth opening (33.5, 30.5, 27.5, and 24.5 mm), and 3 different distances of travel of the mandible (4.5, 3.0, and 1.5 mm). We found that the bite force rapidly declined after the unloading, resulting in a small impact velocity of the lower front teeth. This impact velocity largely depended on the magnitude of the initial bite force and the distance traveled; it was barely sensitive to variations in degree of initial mouth opening. The maximal velocity of the lower teeth was 0.43 m/s (at an initial bite force of 100 N). This maximum was reached after a distance of travel of about 4 mm in 12 ms. The data suggest that the rapid decline in bite force coupled with a limitation of impact velocity is due to the force-velocity properties of the active jaw muscles and is not caused by neural control.
The dependence of the preferred vertical dimension of occlusion (PVDO) of edentulous subjects on the height of the complete dentures the subjects were wearing was investigated. Two experiments were carried out. Experiment I tested whether PVDO is influenced by a change in the vertical dimension of occlusion of the dentures. Experiment II compared PVDO values before and after insertion of dentures that had been constructed with an occlusal vertical dimension equal to PVDO. It is concluded that PVDO is independent of the height of the complete dentures the subject is wearing. Clinical implications are discussed.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.