Preliminary evidence suggests that the multikinase inhibitor sorafenib has clinical activity in FLT3-ITD-positive (FLT3-ITD) acute myeloid leukemia (AML). However, the quality and sustainability of achievable remissions and clinical variables that influence the outcome of sorafenib monotherapy are largely undefined. To address these questions, we evaluated sorafenib monotherapy in 65 FLT3-ITD AML patients treated at 23 centers. All but two patients had relapsed or were chemotherapy-refractory after a median of three prior chemotherapy cycles. Twenty-nine patients (45%) had undergone prior allogeneic stem cell transplantation (allo-SCT). The documented best responses were: hematological remission in 24 patients (37%), bone marrow remission in 5 patients (8%), complete remission (with and without normalization of peripheral blood counts) in 15 patients (23%) and molecular remission with undetectable FLT3-ITD mRNA in 10 patients (15%), respectively. Seventeen of the patients without prior allo-SCT (47%) developed sorafenib resistance after a median treatment duration of 136 days (range, 56-270 days). In contrast, allo-SCT patients developed sorafenib resistance less frequently (38%) and significantly later (197 days, range 38-225 days; P ¼ 0.03). Sustained remissions were seen exclusively in the allo-SCT cohort. Thus, sorafenib monotherapy has significant activity in FLT3-ITD AML and may synergize with allogeneic immune effects to induce durable remissions.

Myeloma cells express basic fibroblast growth factor (bFGF), an angiogenic cytokine triggering marrow neovascularization in multiple myeloma (MM). In solid tumors and some lymphohematopoietic malignancies, angiogenic cytokines have also been shown to stimulate tumor growth via paracrine pathways. Since interleukin-6 (IL-6) is a potent growth and survival factor for myeloma cells, we have studied the effects of bFGF on IL-6 secretion by bone marrow stromal cells (BMSCs) and its potential reverse regulation in myeloma cells. Both myeloma-derived cell lines and myeloma cells isolated from the marrow of MM patients were shown to express and secrete bFGF. Cell-sorting studies identified myeloma cells as the predominant source of bFGF in MM marrow. BMSCs from MM patients and control subjects expressed high-affinity FGF receptors R1 through R4. Stimulation of BMSCs with bFGF induced a time- and dose-dependent increase in IL-6 secretion (median, 2-fold; P <.001), which was completely abrogated by anti-bFGF antibodies. Conversely, stimulation with IL-6 enhanced bFGF expression and secretion by myeloma cell lines (2-fold; P =.02) as well as MM patient cells (up to 3.6-fold; median, 1.5-fold; P =.002). This effect was inhibited by anti-IL-6 antibody. When myeloma cells were cocultured with BMSCs in a noncontact transwell system, both IL-6 and bFGF concentrations in coculture supernatants increased 2- to 3-fold over the sum of basal concentrations in the monoculture controls. The IL-6 increase was again partially, but significantly, inhibited by anti-bFGF. The data demonstrate a paracrine interaction between myeloma and marrow stromal cells triggered by mutual stimulation of bFGF and IL-6.

Summary:We analyzed predictive factors for the outcome of 113 acute myeloid leukemia patients receiving reduced-intensity conditioning prior to allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT). Patients were ineligible for conventional-intensity HSCT. Conditioning consisted of fludarabine and 50% of the conventional dose of busulfan (n ¼ 93) or total body irradiation (n ¼ 20). The source of stem cells was blood in 102 patients, marrow in 10, and both in one. In total, 50 (44.2%) donors were HLAmatched siblings, 50 (44.2%) unrelated fully matched and 13 (11.5%) partially mismatched family (n ¼ 1) or unrelated (n ¼ 12) donors. In all, 107 (94.6%) patients showed neutrophil and platelet engraftment after a median time of 13.5 and 13 days. The probabilities of event-free survival (EFS) (median follow-up: 12 months) were 49% for patients with less than 5% blasts in the marrow, 24% for patients with 5-20% blasts (P ¼ 0.002) and 14% with 420% blasts (Pp0.001). Death occurred because of relapse in 29 patients (25.6%), infection in 12 patients (10.6%), acute graft-versus-host disease in eight patients (7.0%) and organ toxicity in nine patients (7.9%). In multivariate analysis, higher number of blasts in the marrow, alternative donors and low Karnofsky performance score were independent adverse prognostic factors for EFS.

summary In many countries, screening of hepatitis B virus (HBV) in blood donors is limited to HBsAg testing. However, if anti-HBc testing and sensitive HBV nucleic acid amplification testing (NAT) for routine screening are not prescribed, HBV viraemia might remain unrecognized. A clinically inconspicuous HBsAg-negative 35-year-old female blood donor was detected with anti-HBc antibodies following the introduction of anti-HBc screening of donors. Based on her history, she had seroconverted to anti-HBs positive (titre >7000 IU/L) after vaccination. Blood donations were routinely tested HBV-DNA negative by minipool NAT. The individual donor samples were reinvestigated by an ultrasensitive NAT with a lower detection limit of 3.8 IU/mL. Intermittent HBV viraemia was detected over a 7-year period from this donor, with a concentration ranging from 8 to 260 IU/mL. In the subsequent donor-directed lookback study, no post-transfusion hepatitis was detected. Low-level HBV viraemia in simultaneous anti-HBc- and anti-HBs-positive blood donors could only be identified with enhanced sensitivity individual polymerase chain reaction assays and is not detectable by pool HBV NAT.

Hepatitis B surface proteins play a central role in the assembly of the virus and in the infection of the host cells. Whereas some functional aspects of the proteins have been studied in detail, little is known about their structure. Since X-ray analysis of these proteins appear unlikely in the near future, we chose to use a variety of computer-aided methods to improve the model for the major surface protein (SHBs). We here describe the model, discuss it in light of current results in the literature and discuss new functional implications of SHBs.