The Regional Representative Council (DPD) was born in the era where changes to the 1945 Constitution occurred and new problems appeared in the representation system in Indonesia. Based on the provisions of the Constitution of the Republic of Indonesia (UUD) NRI Article 22 C Year 1945, DPD members that are elected through elections and DPD members from each province consist of the same number that is four members, this shows the same provisions without considering the territorial territory and the population of each province. In UUD NRI Article 22 D Year 1945, the regional representative council does not hold any power to form a law. The regional representative council can only submit a draft law to the regional representative council, thus they are unable to make a final political decision. The limited authority of the legislative function of DPD has become a necessity for its reconstruction. Legally, the improvement of this legislation can be done by regularly developing the UUD NRI Year 1945. This is to avoid the implementation of the function of the regional representative council, which does not reflect the spirit of democracy and as one of the mandates of popular sovereignty.
Motivation/Background: The legal problems found in providing compensation in land acquisition for the public interest are vague norms in the interests of justice and feasibility. The legislation on land acquisition has not explained the provision of compensation fairly and adequately.
Method: This research uses normative legal analysis.
Results: This includes that the perspective of fairness in compensation for land acquisition is essentially still characterized by pragmatic development programs and conditions for compensation that the government has determined.
Conclusions: This shows that the provision of compensation must refer to the theory of justice, the idea of practicality and the theory of legal certainty to realize the nature of a prosperous legal state based on Indonesian Socialism and Pancasila.
The deed of Power of Attorney to charge Mortgage Right or known as Surat Kuasa Membebankan Hak Tanggungan (referred to as SKMHT) based on the Article 15 paragraph (3) and (4) of the Mortgage Law has a period of time, if the term is expired, the deed will be null and void by law. Then a new SKHMT is issued to replace the old Deed. The provisions regarding validity period of SKMHT harm creditors, thus a legal protection is needed. Therefore, this study further analyzed the ratio legis of void and null status, the formulation of principle of legal protection for creditors and the urgency to develop a new concept of legal protections for creditors due to the SKMHT is being void and null.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.