Low molecular weight (LMW) heparin has been compared to standard unfractionated (UF) heparin in hemodialysis/hemofiltration in a 12 month, randomized study. Seventy patients with end-stage chronic renal failure starting dialysis treatment were randomly assigned to one of two groups treated with either LMW or UF heparin. The LMW and UF heparin doses used produced similar plasma anti-FXa levels, and comparable antithrombotic effectiveness was observed in the two groups as reflected in similar incidences of thrombus formation in the extracorporeal circulation: 1.59% and 1.33% for LMW and UF heparin, respectively. No bleeding complications were seen with either heparin, but significantly (P less than 0.05) fewer erythrocyte concentrates were needed in the LMW heparin patients. Mean factor VIII activities had risen significantly (P less than 0.001) after 12 months in the UF heparin group, whereas they were unchanged in the LMW heparin group. A significant (P less than 0.05) increase in plasma triglycerides was observed in the UF heparin group which was attributable to six (18.8%) of the patients in this group. Triglyceride concentrations remained relatively constant in the LMW heparin group. Post-heparin lipolytic activity, and in particular hepatic lipase activity, was not stimulated to the same extent in the LMW heparin-treated patients as compared to the UF heparin group. We conclude that LMW heparin is a suitable alternative to standard UF heparin for anticoagulation in hemodialysis/hemofiltration therapy. It may offer potential advantages with regard to a lower requirement for erythrocyte concentrates and less derangement of certain metabolic parameters, such as factor VIII, triglycerides and plasma lipase activity.

Low molecular weight (LMW)-heparin was used as the sole anticoagulant during hemodialysis and hemofiltration in a pilot study on 32 patients. A LMW-heparin dose corresponding to 50% of the patients usual unfractionated, standard (UF)-heparin dose was found to produce comparable plasma heparin levels (anti-FXa-activity). No thrombosis of the extracorporal system and no bleeding complications occurred at this LMW-heparin dose. In contrast to UF-heparin, LMW-heparin produced only slight increases in PTT and thrombin time in all patients. Lipoprotein lipase was stimulated only marginally by LMW-heparin, with a correspondingly reduced release of free fatty acids. Both heparin species caused similar elevations in factor VIII and fibrin monomers, thus excluding a difference in coagulation activation. On the basis of these results, long-term studies have been started at four nephrology centers. To date, 26 patients have been treated with LMW-heparin for 6 months. A LMW-heparin dose was used that produced plasma anti-FXa-activity of 0.5 to 0.9 U/ml (initial dose: 30 to 40; dose/hr: 8 to 15 anti-FXa-units/kg body wt). PTT and thrombin time were only increased by 5 sec on average. Surprisingly, the elevated pre-dialysis levels of factor VIII and fibrin monomers decreased during this 6-month period. Bleeding complications did not occur and thrombotic complications were not observed when the anti-FXa levels were above 0.5 U/ml. LMW-heparin, therefore, appears to be a good alternative to UF-heparin for dialysis patients and may present less risk of bleeding because of its reduced effect on PTT, thrombin time, and thrombocytes.

Antithrombotic activity, necessary doses and effects on coagulation and lipid variables of the low molecular weight heparin derivative Fragmin were compared to unfractionated (UF) heparin in long-term multicentre trials. Results of more than 10,000 dialyses are reported. On the basis of preliminary studies, UF heparin and Fragmin doses were used that lead to anti-Xa activities of more than 0.5 U/ml. With this dose, sufficient antithrombotic activity was achieved with both heparins. Bleeding complications were not noticed. Partial thromboplastin time (PTT) and thrombin time were only marginally increased by Fragmin (5–8 s) in contrast to UF heparin (PTT 90–120 s, thrombin time 230–260 s). Surprisingly, the elevated levels of factor VIII strongly decreased during the 6-month treatment period with Fragmin and increased again during the following 6-month treatment period with UF heparin. Creatinine, urea, haemoglobin and transaminases did not change in both heparin groups: this excluded reduced dialysis efficiency or occult blood loss. Additionally, 15 patients with acute renal failure and high bleeding risk were dialysed with low doses of Fragmin (anti-FXa: 0.2–0.3 U/ml). No severe bleeding occurred. A continuous ambulant peritoneal dialysis patient with deep vein thrombosis was treated effectively with intraperitoneal application of Fragmin for 6 months without any problems.

No abstract

Plasma concentrations of the recently isolated potent vasoconstrictory peptide endothelin were measured in 382 patients. The investigations were performed by means of a sensitive radioimmunoassay specific for Endothelin-1, 2. The results from 110 healthy volunteers displayed a normal range of 44.67 +/- 3.51 pg/ml. Significantly raised levels were found in 33 patients with chronic end-stage renal failure both before and after hemodialysis. In contrast, 35 patients with compensated renal insufficiency did not differ from the normals. Sixty-five patients after kidney transplantation revealed significantly elevated levels, as did 27 patients with acute myocardial infarction, 8 after coronary bypass surgery, and 5 with liver cirrhosis. The mean values of 27 patients with untreated hypertension, 22 with secondary hypertension, of various causes and 16 with coronary artery disease were comparable to the normal population. The values were significantly decreased in 9 pregnant women with hypertension and proteinuria. A marked decline was found in 5 patients with systemic lupus erythematodes, while 20 patients with rheumatoid arthritis demonstrated only a slight decrease. The pathophysiological role of endothelin as a local or circulating hormone in regulating systemic blood pressure or release of other hormones remains to be determined.

After improvement of technical equipment continuous ambulatory blood pressure monitoring is more and more used in the diagnosis of hypertension. New fully automatic systems permit a reliable registration and evaluation of 24-h blood pressure profiles. Typical circadian rhythmics of blood pressure, independent of a variability with different grades of activity, can be demonstrated in normotensive persons and also in patients with essential hypertension. Patients with secondary forms of hypertension show a nivellation or offset of circadian blood pressure rhythmics. A study was performed to examine the antihypertensive efficacy of the calcium antagonist Nitrendipine, the beta 1-adrenoceptor-selective blocker Metoprolol, the beta-blocker with intrinsic activity Mepindolol and the angiotensin converting enzyme inhibitor Enalapril in patients with mild to moderate hypertension over a period of 6 month. Continuous ambulatory blood pressure monitoring was performed before and after 6 month of therapy. 98 of 299 included patients broke off therapy, 47 of those because of side effects. Hydrochlorothiazide was given additionally if the antihypertensive effect of monotherapy was not sufficient after a period of 4 weeks. Morning blood pressure controls at the end of the treatment period showed normotensive values in all groups without significant differences between the groups before and at the end of the treatment period. The number of prescriptions of diuretics necessary to achieve normotension differed between the four treatment groups: Nitrendipine (n = 5), Metoprolol (n = 7), Mepindolol (n = 14), Enalapril (n = 20). In contrast to the morning blood pressure values the continuous 24-h blood pressure monitoring demonstrated significant differences between the therapy groups. Metoprolol turned out as most effective in lowering blood pressure and in reducing the number of systolic blood pressure peaks above 180 mmHg, but on the other hand showed the highest incidence of relative hypotension (less than 100 mmHg systolic, less than 80 mmHg diastolic). Mepindolol demonstrated a significant lower efficacy. In the Nitrendipin group least of all prescriptions of diuretics were necessary and the lowest number of hypotensive systolic blood pressure values occurred. Enalapril showed the most significant reduction of diastolic values above 100 mmHg and the lowest number of diastolic values below 80 mmHg, but the highest number of prescription of diuretics was necessary in the Enalapril group. In none of the four therapy groups a neutralisation of circadian blood pressure rhythmics was demonstrable.

No abstract

No abstract