The nucleus reuniens thalami (RE) originates dense projections to CA1, forming asymmetrical synapses on spines (50%) and dendrites (50%). The hypothesis that RE input modulates transmission in CA1 through excitation of both pyramidal cells and interneurons was tested using electrophysiological methods in the anesthetized rat. The RE-CA1 afferents were selectively stimulated at their origin; evoked field potentials and unit activity were recorded in CA1. RE-evoked depth profiles showed a prominent negative deflection in the stratum lacunosummoleculare and a positive one in the stratum radiatum. The lacunosum-moleculare sink-radiatum source configuration is compatible with RE-elicited depolarization of apical dendrites of pyramidal cells. Despite a consistent and robust paired pulse facilitation of RE-evoked field potentials, population spikes in the stratum pyramidale were not detected at any tested condition. This indicates the inability of RE-CA1 input to discharge pyramidal cells. However, stimulation of RE-elicited spiking of extracellularly recorded units in strata oriens/alveus and distal radiatum, indicative of the activation of local interneurons. Thus, RE seems to modulate transmission in CA1 through a (subthreshold) depolarization of pyramidal cells and a suprathreshold excitation of putative inhibitory oriens /alveus and radiatum interneurons.RE-evoked monosynaptic or disynaptic field potentials were associated with stimulation of rostral or caudal RE, respectively. Anatomically, a projection from caudal to rostral RE was demonstrated that can account for the disynaptic RE-CA1 input. Because caudal RE receives input from the hippocampus via the subiculum, we propose the existence of a closed REhippocampal circuit that allows RE to modulate the activity in CA1, depending on hippocampal output. Key words: rat; electrophysiology; neuroanatomical tracing; hippocampus; midline thalamus; limbic system; learning and memoryThe involvement of thalamic midline nuclei in early stages of Alzheimer's disease Braak, 1991, 1992) and in diencephalic amnesia (Rousseau, 1994) has recently drawn attention to the connectivity between the nucleus reuniens (RE) and structures of the medial temporal lobe (Herkenham, 1978;Wouterlood et al., 1990;Dolleman-Van der Weel and Witter, 1996). In this study we focused on the RE projection to hippocampal field CA1, a crucial structure for learning and memory processes (Squire, 1992).A few investigators have studied the contribution of RE to hippocampal f unctioning. Vanderwolf et al. (1985) examined whether the medial thalamic nuclei, including RE, were involved in generating hippocampal atropine-resistant theta rhythm. Their extensive radiofrequency lesions, however, resulted in little or no effect on this type of rhythmical activity. Hirayasu and Wada (1992a,b) injected NMDA in the thalamic midline of the rat. When NMDA was administered to RE, it caused tonic and/or clonic generalized convulsions associated with temporal limbic EEG seizure discharge. They proposed that RE partic...

1. Intracellular recordings were made from the shell region of the nucleus accumbens in an in vitro slice preparation. The mean resting membrane potential, input resistance, and action potential amplitude of these neurons were -76 +/- 1 mV, 87 +/- 5 M omega and 94 +/- 2 mV (N = 108), respectively. A sample of these neurons (N = 18) was identified as medium spiny neurons with the use of the biocytin-avidin labeling technique. 2. Electrical stimulation of the fornix, subcortical fibers, or neuropil within the nucleus accumbens shell itself elicited a depolarizing postsynaptic potential (PSP). Dopamine (10-100 microM) attenuated PSPs elicited by stimulation of all of these sites. In a paired-pulse stimulation protocol, dopamine was observed to enhance the facilitation of the test response with respect to the conditioning response. 3. The suppressive effect of dopamine was mimicked by the D1 receptor agonist SKF 82958 (10-30 microM), whereas the D2 receptor agonist quinpirole (10-30 microM) was ineffective. The action of dopamine was antagonized by the D1 receptor antagonist Sch 23390 (10-30 microM), but not by the D2 receptor antagonist sulpiride (10-50 microM) or various adrenergic receptor antagonists. 4. The PSP was usually composed of an excitatory postsynaptic potential (EPSP)-inhibitory postsynaptic potential (IPSP) sequence. Dopamine equally attenuated the excitatory and inhibitory component of the synaptic response. The attenuation of both EPSP and IPSP did not depend on membrane potential. 5. Dopamine effects on the resting membrane potential and input resistance were variable and did not correlate with changes in the PSP. Two further indications were found in favor of a presynaptic locus of dopaminergic modulation. First, the time course of the PSP was not altered during dopamine application. Second, dopamine did not attenuate depolarizations induced by bath-applied L-glutamate. In extracellular recordings, it was found that dopamine reduced the population spike but not the presynaptic fiber volley. 6. These findings strongly indicate that dopaminergic modulation of synaptic responses in neurons located in the accumbens shell region is mediated by presynaptic D1 receptors. Notably, dopamine does not exert a purely inhibitory effect on synaptic excitability in the nucleus accumbens, because it suppresses both the excitatory and inhibitory component of the synaptic response.

Rats with bilateral neurotoxic reuniens (RE), mediodorsal (MD), hippocampal (HIPP) or sham (SH) lesions were tested in a standard watermaze task, together with unoperated rats. RE-rats and SH-controls readily learned to swim directly to a hidden platform. In contrast, MD-rats displayed a transient deficit characterized initially by thigmotaxis. Like in previous studies, HIPP-rats had long latencies throughout training and displayed more random swims than the other groups. In a memory probe test with the platform removed, SH-and RE-rats approached the correct location relatively directly but, whereas SH-controls persistently searched in the training quadrant, RE-rats switched to searching all over the pool. The MDgroup swam in loops to the platform, but then displayed persistent searching in the training quadrant. The HIPPgroup performed at chance. These distinct patterns indicate that, although their search strategies were different, REand MD-rats had acquired sufficient knowledge about the platform location and could recall information in the probe test. All groups performed well in a subsequent cue test with a visible platform, with RE-rats initially escaping faster than the SH-and HIPP-groups, and MD-rats improving from an initially poorer level of performance to control level. This indicates that there were no sensorimotor or motivational deficits associated with any of the lesions. In conclusion, while the RE and MD nuclei seem not to be critical for the learning and memory of a standard watermaze task, they may contribute to non-mnemonic strategy shifting when animals are challenged in ways that do not occur during training.

No abstract