on behalf of the CAN Investigator Group { Summary. Objective: To develop and validate a questionnaire to assess asthma control in children (CAN). Design: Two versions of the CAN (for carers and children) were developed. Both versions were validated in an observational, prospective, multicenter study performed in 38 hospital outpatient clinics throughout Spain. Four hundred fifteen patients and their carers agreed to participate. Of these, 414 patients under 14 years old with frequent episodic or persistent (moderate to severe) asthma completed the questionnaire on 3 occasions (baseline, week 2, and week 12). For patients aged 2-8 the questionnaire was only completed by the carers, but for patients aged 9-14 the questionnaire was completed by the carers and the children. Clinician ratings of asthma control were used as a gold standard to assess the sensitivity, specificity, PPV and NPV of the new measure. Results: Evaluable responses were obtained from 215 carers for children aged 2-8 years and 199 children aged 9-14 years, and their parents. Using a questionnaire total score cut-off of 8 the patient version had a sensitivity of 76.3% and a specificity of 62.9%. For carer version these values were 73% and 69.7%, respectively. A cut point of 8 was selected to maximize the screening accuracy of the CAN questionnaire. Effect sizes in patients with clinician-rated improvements in asthma control were 0.33 and 0.57 for the carer and child versions, respectively. Conclusions: The screening accuracy and validity of the CAN questionnaire make it suitable for use in research and clinical practice. The sensitivity and specificity were close to 70%, which is acceptable for the study objective: obtain a tool to measure the level of asthma control.

We showed sensitisation to goat and sheep cheese in two patients, and only to sheep cheese in another two of the studied patients.

Paediatric patients treated by specialists for allergic rhinitis have moderate or severe disease. Symptomatic treatment was extensively prescribed but often did not achieve good disease control. Many specialists preferred a wait-and-see approach before prescribing immunotherapy.

The new extensively hydrolysed casein product is safe and well tolerated by most children with ACMP. However, as with other extensive hydrolysates, some highly sensitised patients may present clinical manifestations. Controlled tolerance testing is therefore advised, under specialised medical supervision.

Specific immunotherapy in children under five years of age with the extract used is safe. We consider that further studies are needed, involving other types of extracts, to allow reconsideration of the relative contraindication of patient age for the administration of immunotherapy.