Acromegaly is a severe neuroendocrine disease characterized by hypersecretion of growth hormone (GH) caused in 95% of cases by pituitary adenoma, which leads to the development of pathology of various organs and systems. The severity of the condition is due not only to the direct effect of somatotropic hormone on the body and the effect of the adenoma on the surrounding structures, but also to the age of the patient and complications associated with the disease. Improvement in treatment methods allows for a personalized approach to patient management, taking into account various aspects of the clinical case. It is important for a specialist to take into account comorbidity in acromegaly, both in terms of pathological disorders and the impact on the patient’s psycho-emotional state. We present a clinical case of successful treatment with somatostatin analogues (ASS) in a patient who is afraid of surgery and has cardiovascular complications of acromegaly. Since the onset of acromegaly, confirmed by an elevated level of insulin-like growth factor-1 (IGF-1) and an endosellar pituitary macroadenoma measuring 11x9.5x8 mm, ASS therapy was initiated in the patient. The choice in favor of conservative treatment was due to a burdened cardiovascular history and the patient’s fear of surgery. Within three years from the start of drug therapy, there was a significant improvement in overall well-being, a tendency to reduce the size of the pituitary adenoma, and biochemical remission was achieved. The clinical case described by us confirms the possibility of successful primary treatment of ASS in a patient with acromegaly, taking into account all individual characteristics.
BACKGROUND: In patients with end-stage CKD, receiving renal replacement therapy (RRT) with programmed hemodialysis (HD), the severity of complications is associated with metabolic disturbances: accumulation of uremic toxins, nephrogenic anemia, secondary hyperparathyroidism (SHPT), extraskeletal calcification, impaired clearance and rhythm of hormone secretion.AIM: To evaluate the main biochemical and hormonal parameters, and manifestations of mineral bone disease (MBD) in patients receiving RRT with HD, before and after hemodialysis, taking into account the presence or absence of diabetes mellitus.MATERIALS AND METHODS: We divided all patients receiving RRT with HD in two groups: #1 (n=24) — patients with DM, #2 (n=16) — patients without DM. All of them had their blood analyzed before and immediately after the HD. Data analysis was performed with the Statistica 13 (StatSoft, USA). A prognostically significant model was considered at p<0.05.RESULTS: The level of iPTH, both at baseline and after HD, was lower in group #1 (p<0.001). The level of alkaline phosphatase (AP) was significantly higher in group #2 (p=0.012). In both groups before HD, a high incidence of hypocalcemia was detected (according to albumin-corrected calcium in group #1 in 58.3%, in group #2 in 43.7% of cases, p = 0.366) and hyperphosphatemia (in 66.7% and in 43 .7% of cases, respectively, p=0.151). Hypocalcemia after HD in group #1 persisted in 14%, in group #2 — in 20% of cases (p>0.05); hyperphosphatemia in group #1 was completely leveled, in group #2 it persisted in 7% of cases (p=0.417). Prior to the HD session, group #1 had significantly higher levels of RAGE, glucagon, immunoreactive insulin (IRI), cortisol, and glucose than after the HD session (p<0.05). In group #2, after HD, the levels of glucagon, IRI and cortisol significantly decreased (p<0.05), and the level of 3-nitrotyrosine (3-HT) increased significantly (p=0.026). In group #1, fibrocalcinosis of the heart valves according to ECHO and calcification of the arteries of the lower extremities according to ultrasonic doplerography were more common than in group #2 (42% vs 25%, p<0.001 and 75% vs 37.5%, p=0.018, respectively). (χ2)). Compression fractures occurred with the same frequency in both groups (60%). A decrease in bone mineral density (BMD) to the level of osteopenia was noted more often in group #1 (50% vs 18.8%), and osteoporosis was more common in group #2 (68.8% vs 33.3%) (p<0.001, χ2).CONCLUSION: The low level of PTH in group #1 may reflect the effect of diabetes on calcium-phosphorus metabolism. Patients with DM have an increased risk of renal osteodystrophy with a low bone turnover because of a number of metabolic factors inherent in diabetes. At the same time, the dynamics of phosphorus and calcium indicators during the HD procedure were similar.
At the present time, a simultaneous pancreas-kidney transplantation (SPKT) is an effective method of treatment for patients on renal replacement therapy by hemodialysis program in the outcome of the terminal stage of diabetic nephropathy. This method of treatment solves several problems: it reduces the severity of intoxication syndrome, contributes to the achievement of euglycemia in most cases, which certainly allows to slow the progression of micro- and macrovascular complications of diabetes. Despite of positive effect of euglycaemia and kidney function normalization, the accumulated metabolic memory legacy of long-term uncompensated diabetes mellitus is realized, which makes a posttransplantational rehabilitation of patients difficult. A duration of hemodialysis therapy is known as a cardiovascular events risk factor, which affects the surgery result and favorable posttransplant period. More often after successful SPKT microvascular diabetic complications are stabilized, but macrovascular diabetic complications, diabetic neuroosteoarthropathy and mineral and bone disease are progressed. That’s why is necessary to perform regular examination after SPKT by a team of specialists, including nephrologist, endocrinologist, cardiologist, ophthalmologist with correction of ongoing therapy. Therefore both the preparation of the patient for transplantation with the earliest possible placement on the waiting list and the post-transplant rehabilitation afterwards are extremely important.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
hi@scite.ai
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
Copyright © 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.