Background: Previous meta-analyses have estimated summary positive associations between clinical prostatitis and prostate cancer. However, none have accounted for detection bias, the possibility for increased prostate cancer screening and detection in men with clinical prostatitis, in their pooled estimates. Methods: We searched for studies that investigated the relation between clinical prostatitis and prostate cancer through November 2018. Random-effects meta-analysis was used to calculate summary odds ratios (ORs) among all studies and in strata defined by methods used to reduce detection bias. Results: Although an increased odds of prostate cancer was seen among men with a history of clinical prostatitis in all 38 eligible studies combined (OR=2.05, 95% CI: 1.64-2.57), this estimate attenuated to null among studies that performed the most rigorous analyses to limit detection bias (OR=1.16, 95% CI: 0.77-1.74). Conclusions: Our findings indicate that previously reported positive associations between clinical prostatitis and prostate cancer are likely due to detection bias. Impact: Studies using rigorous detection bias methods are warranted to replicate these findings, as well as to examine the possible relation between prostate inflammation and prostate cancer
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.