Background: Colonoscopy with detection and removal of adenomas is considered a powerful tool to reduce colorectal cancer (CRC) incidence. However, the degree of protection achievable in a population setting with high-quality colonoscopy resources remains to be quantified.

IntroductionSomatostatin receptors (SSTR) are widely distributed in well-differentiated neuroendocrine neoplasms (NEN) and serve as primary targets for diagnostics and treatment. An overexpression of the chemokine receptor CXCR4, in contrast, is considered to be present mainly in highly proliferative and advanced tumors. Comparative data are still lacking, however, for neuroendocrine carcinomas (NEC).MethodsSSTR subtype (1, 2A, 3, 5) and CXCR4 expression was evaluated in G1 (n = 31), G2 (n = 47), and low (G3a; Ki-67: 21–49%; n = 21) and highly proliferative (G3b; Ki-67: >50%, n = 22) G3 (total n = 43) gastroenteropancreatic NEN samples by performing immunohistochemistry with monoclonal rabbit anti-human anti-SSTR and anti-CXCR4 antibodies, respectively, and was correlated with clinical data.ResultsBoth CXCR4 and SSTR were widely expressed in all tumors investigated. CXCR4 expression differed significantly between the G1 and G3 specimens and within the G3 group (G3a to G3b), and was positively correlated with Ki-67 expression. SSTR2A, in contrast, exhibited an inverse association with Ki-67. SSTR2A was highly expressed in G1 and G2 tumors, but was significantly less abundant in G3 carcinomas. Additionally, SSTR1 expression was higher in G3a than in G3b tumors.ConclusionWe observed an elevation in CXCR4 and a decrease in SSTR2A expression with increasing malignancy. Interestingly, 23% of the G3 specimens had strong SSTR2A expression.Because CXCR4 was strongly expressed in highly proliferative G3 carcinomas, it is an interesting new target and needs to be validated in larger studies.

GCA with GCGR germline mutations seems to follow an autosomal-recessive trait. By interrupting the GCGR signaling pathways GCGR mutations probably cause GCA via glucagon cell hyperplasia. GCA also occurs in patients without GCGR mutations, but seems to be associated with fewer and smaller tumors.

There is need to determine tissue-specific robust controls for normalization of microRNA expression to avoid false results and misinterpretation. The aim of this study was to evaluate the expression of different small RNAs in neuroendocrine tumors (NETs) and their suitability as normalizers in miRNA real-time PCR experiments. We investigated the expression of the nine small RNAs miR-93, miR-191, SNORD48, SNORD61, SNORD68, SNORD72, SNORD95, SNORD96a, and RNU6-2 in formalin-fixed, paraffin-embedded tissue samples of 25 ileal NETs by real-time PCR determining the most stable controls for expression normalization using four different algorithms. This analysis was expended to ten pancreatic NETs. Finally, five small RNAs were further tested as normalizers for miRNA-133a expression, which is known to be downregulated in metastases of ileal NETs, in ten matched pairs of ileal NETs and their metastases. Ranking of the expression results revealed the following order of stability from high to low: SNORD61 < SNORD95 < SNORD72 < SNORD96a < SNORD68 < miR-191 < miR-93 < RNU6-2 < SNORD48 for ileal NETs and SNORD95 < miR-93 < SNORD96a < SNORD61 < SNORD68 < SNORD72 < RNU6-2 < miR-191 < SNORD48 for pancreatic NETs. The determination of SNORD61 and SNORD95 for ileal NETs and SNORD95 and miR-93 for pancreatic NETs as good normalizers presents a useful tool for experiments involving the analysis of miRNA expression.

No abstract