Climatic chamber experiments were carried out with male subjects who were submitted to various rapid temperature changes. All experiments were performed first with the subjects at rest and later at work on a bicycle ergometer. The aims of the study were to obtain quantitative data enabling to determine effects of abrupt thermal load, abrupt work load, and combined load on the topography and the dynamics of temperatures and effectors, and to answer the question whether the effects of combined load may be computed by a linear superposition of pure thermal plus pure work load. Skin temperatures generally respond more directly to abrupt changes of thermal than of work load. This is in contrast to the dynamic behaviour of central temperatures which moreover exhibit the interesting effect of a transient paradoxical response both to the onset of work and of thermal load. Time constants of the dynamics of metabolic heat production are high in response to changes of thermal load as compared to the time constants at the onset and end of work. Generally the time constants of skin temperatures are shorter at rest than at work. Temperature topography changes only to a small extent in exercising subjects. The central temperature increase to combined thermal and work load is not significantly different from the added amount of temperature increases due to pure thermal and to pure work load. This suggests a quasi-linear superposition of both thermal effects and confirms, in accordance with further evidence of this and former studies, the hypothesis that work load does not interfere non-linearly with the regulatory processes.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)
Climatic chamber experiments were carried out on young, healthy male students. The ambient temperature was 36 degrees C, while local warming of one extremity was compensated for by heatflow-equivalent cooling of the ipsilateral extremity by on-line calculation of the heat balance. When warming the arm and cooling the leg (type 1 experiments), a slight, but not statistically significant increase of local sweat rates at these extremities was recorded. However, when cooling the arm and warming the leg (type 2 experiments), both corresponding local sweat rates declined. The divergent results are interpreted in terms of previously reported different central weighting factors for skin temperatures as determined: (1) by the weighting for the area, or (2) by the weighting for the area and the sensitivity of the local sweat rate to warming and cooling. This means that the central processing of the mean skin temperature may be different for cooling and warming and that in both cases values can be different from recorded (area weighted) skin temperature. Calculating this modified mean skin temperature, we conclude that type 1 experiments may be interpreted by the hypothesis that the central regulator has a status very near an overall heat-balance, whereas type 2 experiments, although also carried out at heat-balance, may be centrally evaluated as predominant cooling. In these experiments again the central drives representing the whole body thermal state seem to override both the direct and centrally mediated local drives.
Three kinds of experiments were carried out in a climatic chamber: experiments with warm load on the whole body at 36 degrees C (4 subjects); experiments at 36 degrees C with reduction of thermal load (28 degrees C) on the left leg (right leg at 36 degrees C) (8 subjects); and experiments at 36 degrees C with antisymmetric thermal load on the legs of 44 degrees C (right leg) and 28 degrees C (left leg), which resulted in additional thermal loads of +/- 30 W/leg (8 subjects). The additional thermal loads, which were applied via two climatic boxes, produced measurable effects on sweat rate when applied to one leg only. In comparison to the experiment 1, experiment 2 brought about a significant reduction of local evaporation on the left leg. With antisymmetric thermal loads on both legs (experiment 3), which did not influence the overall thermal balance, there was no significant influence on local evaporation, although significant changes of local temperatures were measured. It is suggested that the well-known regulatory models, declaring local, mean skin, and core temperatures as local evaporation drive should be supplemented with an important additional feature: local control of evaporation by local skin temperature may be blocked by an overall thermal balance.
Experiments in which the whole human body was heated or cooled are compared with others in which one extremity (arm or leg) was simultaneously cooled or heated. With a warm load on the rest of the body resulting in general sweating, a cold load on one extremity did not evoke local shivering; with general body cooling, heating one limb did not stop the shivering. Skin temperatures of the other parts of the body were not influenced by warming or cooling one extremity. Evaporative heat loss was influenced by local, mean skin and core temperature, whereas shivering did not depend on local temperature, and vasomotor control seemed to be controlled predominantly by central temperatures. A cold load on an extremity during whole body heating in most cases induced an oscillatory behaviour of core temperature and of the evaporative heat loss from the body and the extremity. It is assumed that local, mean skin and core temperatures influence the three autonomous effector systems to very different degree.
To examine the compensatory effects of work-induced thermal load and symmetrically applied local cooling on local sweat rates, two kinds of experiment were carried out on eight male subjects in a climatic chamber: 1) Experiments at 36 degrees C ambient temperature with a work load of about 25 W by the right leg. 2) Experiments at 36 degrees C ambient temperature with a work load of about 25 W by the right leg as in 1., but with additional compensatory cooling of the left leg controlled throughout by heat balance calculations at 75-85 W, equal to the heat produced in the working leg, the necessary air temperature being dependent on local sweat rate. Work load without cooling brought about a significant increase in core temperatures, metabolism, heart rate and local sweat rates. With unchanged local skin temperatures local sweat rate increase was higher in the working leg. Therefore the existence of muscle thermoreceptors should be assumed, the afferent information from which is processed and weighted in a different way to that provided by skin receptors. Work load combined with additional cooling reduced local and mean skin temperatures and heart rate, but had no significant influence on core temperature or metabolism. However, local sweat rate was generally lower in both thighs, with a major reduction in the cooled leg confirming control of local sweat rate by local temperature.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
customersupport@researchsolutions.com
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
Copyright © 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.