ER+ breast cancers depend on ER signaling throughout disease progression, including after acquired resistance to existing endocrine agents, providing a rationale for further optimization and development of ER-targeting agents. Fulvestrant is unique amongst currently approved ER ligand therapeutics due to its classification as a full ER antagonist, which is thought to be achieved through degradation of ERα protein. However, the full clinical potential of fulvestrant is believed to be limited by poor physiochemical properties and exposure limitations due to its administration by intramuscular injection. Strategies to generate orally bioavailable molecules that retain fulvestrant's full antagonist profile but with considerably improved drug-like properties are thus being widely employed to identify next generation ER therapeutics. However, we find that therapeutic candidates that have recently emerged from prospective optimization of ER degradation, including GDC-0810 and GDC-0927, are not mechanistically equivalent. GDC-0810, GDC-0927, and fulvestrant display unique profiles in terms of ER degradation, transcriptional phenotypes and anti-proliferative potential across a panel of ER+ breast cancer cell lines. In HCI-011 (ER.WT) and HCI-013 (ER.Y537S) ER+ patient-derived breast cancer xenograft (PDX) models, GDC-0927 achieves more robust transcriptional suppression of ER than GDC-0810, and also and greater efficacy. Although displaying a more desirable mechanistic profile than GDC-0810, GDC-0927 has more rapid clearance and poor oral bioavailability, leading to a high pill burden and potential exposure limitation. Here, we describe for the first time GDC-9545, in which the distinct liabilities of GDC-0810, GDC-0927 and fulvestrant are addressed. GDC-9545 is a non-steroidal ER ligand that is highly potent in competing with estradiol for binding and in driving an antagonist conformation within the ER ligand binding domain. Like fulvestrant, and displaying some improvements over GDC-0927, GDC-9545 consistently induces ER turnover and drives deep transcriptional suppression of ER, resulting in robust in vitro anti-proliferative activity. GDC-9545 exhibits reduced metabolism and increased oral bioavailability relative to GDC-0927, resulting in an overall improved oral exposure in multiple species. As a result of both its mechanistic pharmacology and improved oral exposure, GDC-9545 can achieve the same degree of anti-tumor activity as GDC-0927 but at 100-fold lower doses in the HCI-013 PDX model. The in vivo efficacy of GDC-9545 in this model is greater than GDC-0810 and fulvestrant at clinically relevant exposures. The highly potent in vivo efficacy of GDC-9545 likely arises due to the particular combination of high binding potency, full suppression of ER signaling, and an improved DMPK profile when compared to GDC-0927 and fulvestrant. GDC-9545 is currently being evaluated in Phase 1 clinical trials (ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT03332797). Citation Format: Metcalfe C, Ingalla E, Blake RA, Chang J, Daemen A, De Bruyn T, Giltnane JM, Guan J, Hafner M, Hartman S, Kategaya L, Kleinheinz T, Liang J, Mody V, Nannini M, Oeh J, Ubhayakar S, Wertz I, Young A, Zbieg J, Zhou W, Sampath D, Friedman LS, Wang X. GDC-9545: A novel ER antagonist and clinical candidate that combines desirable mechanistic and pre-clinical DMPK attributes [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 2018 San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium; 2018 Dec 4-8; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2019;79(4 Suppl):Abstract nr P5-04-07.
Small molecule inhibitors of cyclin-dependent kinases (CDK) 4/6 have created new opportunities for the treatment of advanced hormone-receptor positive (HR+) breast cancer and show promise in other malignancies. Three CDK4/6 inhibitors, palbociclib (PD0332991; Ibrance), ribociclib (LEE011; Kisqali), and abemaciclib (LY2835219), which have been approved or are in late stage trials, are reported to be broadly similar although recent data suggest that abemaciclib has distinct single-agent activity in patients and a unique adverse effects profile. Differences in pharmacokinetics and relative potency for CDK4 versus CDK6 are postulated to account for these differences. In this paper, we use molecular and functional profiling by mRNA sequencing, mass spectrometry-based proteomics, and GR-based dose-response assays to obtain complementary views of the mechanisms of action of CDK4/6 inhibitors. We show that abemaciclib, but not ribociclib or palbociclib, is a potent inhibitor of kinases other than CDK4/6, including CDK1/Cyclin B, which appears to cause arrest in the G2 phase of the cell cycle, and CDK2/Cyclin E/A, which is implicated in resistance to palbociclib. Whereas ribociclib and palbociclib induce cytostasis, and cells adapt to these drugs within 2-3 days of exposure, abemaciclib induces cell death and durably blocks cell proliferation. Abemaciclib is active even in retinoblastoma protein (pRb)-deficient cells in which CDK4/6 inhibition by palbociclib or ribociclib is completely ineffective. The degree of polypharmacology of small molecule drugs is increasingly viewed as an important consideration in their design, with implications for efficacy, toxicity, and acquired resistance. In the case of CDK4/6 inhibitors, we propose that abemaciclib polypharmacology elicits unique molecular responses that are likely to be therapeutically advantageous. More generally, we propose that multi-omic approaches are required to fully elucidate the spectrum of targets relevant to drug action in tumor cells. We expect such understanding to assist in stratifying patient populations and ordering sequential therapies when resistance arises. Citation Format: Hafner M, Mills CE, Subramanian K, Chen C, Boswell SA, Everley RA, Juric D, Sorger PK. Advantageous polypharmacology of abemaciclib revealed by omics profiling of CDK4/6 inhibitors [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 2017 San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium; 2017 Dec 5-9; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2018;78(4 Suppl):Abstract nr PD4-02.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
hi@scite.ai
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
Copyright © 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.