The counterregulatory hormone responses of cortisol, growth hormone, glucagon, epinephrine, norepinephrine, and dopamine to a fixed hypoglycemic stimulus (50 mg/dl for 1 h) were studied in five type I (insulin-dependent) diabetic subjects during conventional insulin therapy (CT), after 3 mo of continuous subcutaneous insulin infusion (SC), and after 3 mo of continuous intravenous insulin infusion (IV). During the two infusion periods, the overall mean levels of preprandial blood glucose (116 +/- 6 SC vs. 114 +/- 5 mg/dl IV) and glycosylated hemoglobin (6.1 +/- 2 SC vs. 5.9 +/- 2% IV) were virtually identical, but there were more hypoglycemic episodes and greater variability of preprandial blood glucose levels during SC than with IV. During the last 30 min of the hypoglycemic clamps, the mean levels of epinephrine and cortisol were significantly lower after 3 mo of SC (epinephrine, 268 +/- 80 pg/ml; cortisol, 14 +/- 1 microgram/dl) than with both CT (epinephrine 485 +/- 80 pg/ml; cortisol, 20 +/- 2 micrograms/dl) and IV (epinephrine, 443 +/- 62 pg/ml; cortisol, 19 +/- 2 micrograms/dl)(P less than .05). The mean growth hormone level was significantly (P less than .05) lower after SC (37 +/- 9 ng/ml) than after IV (79 +/- 12 ng/ml), but it did not reach statistical significance compared with CT (66 +/- 12 ng/ml). The mean glucagon, dopamine, and norepinephrine levels during the same period of hypoglycemia were not different when all treatment regimens were compared. We conclude that intensified insulin therapy with SC leads to significant blunting of the counterregulatory hormone response to hypoglycemia, whereas IV does not.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)
To determine if the more rapid absorption of subcutaneously administered human insulin, as compared with animal insulin, would result in an improved postprandial metabolic response, ten persons with type I diabetes mellitus were studied during a fixed meal. Plasma glucose and insulin concentrations were compared after subcutaneous injections of 0.2 U/kg body weight of regular biosynthetic human insulin or regular purified pork insulin in a double-blind randomized crossover trial. Meal glycemic excursions improved after the administration of biosynthetic human insulin, when compared with purified pork insulin (p less than 0.05 at 150, 180, and 210 minutes postprandially). Serum free immunoreactive insulin concentrations were significantly higher after injections of biosynthetic human insulin, and the rate of incremental rise during the first 30 minutes was also greater. Insulin antibody studies showed a strong negative correlation between peak insulin levels and the association constant for the high-affinity-binding insulin antibodies. We conclude that biosynthetic human insulin is more rapidly absorbed after subcutaneous injection than is purified pork insulin, a characteristic that results in improved postprandial metabolic control.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
hi@scite.ai
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
Copyright © 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.