The atopy patch test (APT) is a procedure involving epicutaneous patch tests with allergens known to elicit IgE-mediated reactions and the evaluation of eczematous skin lesions. APT can be performed on normal uninvolved skin without artificial manipulations such as tape stripping or use of irritants. APT has been standardized regarding the use of vehicle and dose response relationships. In several studies, approximately two thirds of patients with atopic eczema (AE) showed positive APT reactions to aeroallergens, most frequently to house dust mite. Positive APT reactions were significantly more frequent in patients with a typical air-exposed eczematous distribution pattern. Using evaporimetry to study transepidermal water loss, allergen-induced disturbance of epidermal barrier functions was found to be significantly more pronounced on APT reactions compared to classical contact allergy patch test sites in the same individual. It has been shown that with APT eczematous skin lesions can be elicited by skin contact with aeroallergens, at least in a subgroup of patients with AE, and thereby, that IgE-mediated allergy does play a role in the etiopathophysiology of this disease. Future studies should help to bring this test into clinical routine in order to establish an equivalent for ‘skin provocation’ comparable to nasal and bronchial provocation tests in respiratory allergy.
Sun-bathing may be beneficial for psychologic reasons and may produce euphoric effects, but we do not see any reason to treat acne with ultraviolet radiation because of all its negative effects on the skin.
Background: Altered epidermal barrier function as determined by transepidermal water loss (TEWL) is a typical feature in patients with atopic eczema (AE). Objective: The purpose of this study was to assess the kinetics of epidermal regeneration after barrier perturbation induced by two different stimuli, namely acetone treatment (removal of stratum corneum lipids) and tape stripping (removal of the nonviable stratum corneum). Methods: Fifteen patients with AE and 12 nonatopic healthy controls were investigated. An area of 9.0 cm2 of clinically normal skin of the forearm flexural side was treated by acetone or tape stripping in a way that an increase in TEWL of 3.5–4.0 times the pretreatment value was achieved. TEWL was recorded directly after perturbation (t0), after 15 min (t1), 3 h (t2), 6 h (t3), 24 h (t4), 48 h (t5), 72 h (t6) and 96 h (t7). Results: The speed of epidermal regeneration was faster after acetone treatment, both in the patient and the control groups, with no significant difference between the two. However, after tape stripping at points t2, t5 and t6, TEWL values relative to t0 were significantly lower in atopic skin as compared to normal skin (p < 0.05). Conclusions: The faster regeneration of barrier function after tape stripping in patients with AE may be the result of a persisting mild disturbance of barrier function. It may be speculated that repair mechanisms are permanently activated, and therefore barrier recovery is faster. However, a complete restoration of the epidermal barrier function is not achieved, perhaps because of the decreased content of ceramides in atopic skin.
Atopic eczema (AE) is a common skin disorder. Eczematous lesions showing macroscopic, microscopic and immunopathological resemblance to lesional AE can be induced by aeroallergens by epicutaneous testing (atopy patch test, APT). Altered epidermal barrier function, as determined by transepidermal water loss (TEWL), is a typical feature of patients with AE. The present investigation was performed to define the differences in the epidermal barrier function between positive APT reactions to aeroallergens and positive patch test reactions to contact allergens in AE patients. Allergen extracts from grass pollen, birch pollen, cat dander and house dust mite (Dermatophagoides pteronyssinus) were applied in large Finn chambers on Scanpor for 48 h on the clinically unaffected and untreated skin of the back, in 11 patients with AE. The same procedure was done with 27 contact allergens of a standard test battery. Test reactions were read and TEWL was measured after 48 and 72 h. Eight of the 11 patients developed positive APT reactions to D. pteronyssinus, two to cat dander and one to birch pollen. Seven of the 11 patients showed positive patch test reactions to nickel sulphate, two to potassium dichromate, one to thiuram-mix and one to paraphenylenediamine. Vehicle controls were negative. The TEWL of the positive APT reactions was significantly higher, both after 48 h (mean +/- standard deviation 10.0 +/- 6.5 g/m2h) and after 72 h (9.7 +/- 5.4 g/m2h) as compared with the control site (48/72h: 4.4 +/- 1.5/4.1 +/- 1.4 g/m2h) (P < 0.01). In contrast, TEWL of the positive patch test reactions to contact allergens (48/72 h: 5.4 +/- 2.2/5.4 +/- 1.9 g/m2h) was similar to that of the control site (48/72 h: 5.2 +/- 2.1/5.0 +/- 1.8 g/m2h) (not significant). The relative TEWL at 48 h and 72 h, expressed as the ratio between the positive patch test and the control site, was significantly higher in the positive APT reactions (48/72 h: 218.8 +/- 80.4%/232.0 +/- 85.9%) compared with positive patch test reactions to contact allergens (48/72 h: 102.1 +/- 12.0%/107.1 +/- 9.5%) (P < 0.01). It is concluded that the epidermal barrier function in AE patients is altered only in positive APT reactions, in contrast to positive patch test reactions to contact allergens. As a consequence of this aeroallergen-induced altered epidermal barrier function, further allergens can more easily penetrate the skin, inducing a vicious circle and perpetuating the eczematous lesions.
Paraffinomas of the male genitalia are now rare. We report on a Russian patient with subcutaneous nodules of the penis and the prepuce. Injections of exogenous lipids into the male genitalia are still performed in many Eastern European countries. Thus, a paraffinoma should be considered in the differential diagnosis of subcutaneous nodules of the male genitalia in patients from these areas.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
hi@scite.ai
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
Copyright © 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.