There has been no agreement among different authors on guidelines to specify the situations in which arthrodesis is justified in terms of results, risks and complications. The aim of this study was to identify preoperative predictors of outcome after decompressive lumbar surgery and instrumented posterolateral fusion. A prospective observational study design was performed on 203 consecutive patients. Potential preoperative predictors of outcome included sociodemographic factors as well as variables pertaining to the preoperative clinical situation, diagnosis, expectations and surgery. Separate multiple linear regression models were used to assess the association between selected predictors and outcome variables, defined as the improvement after 1 year on the visual analog scale (VAS) for back pain, VAS for leg pain, physical component scores (PCS) of SF-36 and Oswestry disability index (ODI). Follow-up was available for 184 patients (90.6%). Patients with higher educational level and optimistic preoperative expectations had a more favourable postoperative leg pain (VAS) and ODI. Smokers had less leg pain relief. Patients with better mental component score (emotional health) had greater ODI improvement. Less preoperative walking capacity predicted more leg pain relief. Patients with disc herniation had greater relief from back pain and more PCS and ODI improvement. More severe lumbar pain was predictive of less improvement on ODI and PCS. Age, sex, body mass index, analgesic use, surgeon, self-rated health, the number of decompressed levels and the length of fusion had no association with outcome. This study concludes that a higher educational level, optimistic expectations for improvement, the diagnosis of ''disc herniation'', less walking capacity and good emotional health may significantly improve clinical outcome. Smoking and more severe lumbar pain are predictors of worse results.

Xanthine oxidoreductase (XOR) catalyzes the final two reactions that lead to uric acid formation. XOR is a complex molibdoflavoenzyme present in two different functional forms: dehydrogenase and xantine oxidase (XO). XO is a critical source of reactive oxygen species (ROS) that contribute to vascular inflammation. Under normal physiological conditions, it is mainly found in the dehydrogenase form, while in inflammatory situations, posttranslational modification converts the dehydrogenase form into XO. These inflammatory conditions lead to an increase in XO levels and thus an increased ROS generation by the enzymatic process, finally resulting in alterations in vascular function. It has also been shown that XO secondarily leads to peroxynitrite formation. Peroxynitrite is one of the most powerful ROS that is produced by the reaction of nitric oxide and superoxide radicals, and is considered to be a marker for reactive nitrogen species, accompanied by oxidative stress. Febuxostat is a novel nonpurine XO-specific inhibitor for treating hyperuricemia. As febuxostat inhibits both oxidized and reduced forms of the enzyme, it inhibits the ROS formation and the inflammation promoted by oxidative stress. The administration of febuxostat has also reduced nitro-oxidative stress. XO serum levels are significantly increased in various pathological states such as inflammation, ischemia-reperfusion or aging and that XO-derived ROS formation is involved in oxidative damage. Thus, it may be possible that the inhibition of this enzymatic pathway by febuxostat would be beneficial for the vascular inflammation. In animal models, febuxostat treatment has already demonstrated anti-inflammatory effects, together with the reduction in XO activity. However, the role of febuxostat in humans requires further investigation.

Background Whether immunosuppressed (IS) patients have a worse prognosis of COVID-19 compared to non-IS patients is not known. The aim of this study was to evaluate the clinical characteristics and outcome of IS patients hospitalized with COVID-19 compared to non-IS patients. Methods We designed a retrospective cohort study. We included all patients hospitalized with laboratory-confirmed COVID-19 from the SEMI-COVID-19 Registry, a large multicentre national cohort in Spain, from March 27th until June 19th, 2020. We used multivariable logistic regression to assess the adjusted odds ratios (aOR) of in-hospital death among IS compared to non-IS patients. Results Among 13 206 included patients, 2 111 (16.0%) were IS. A total of 166 (1.3%) patients had solid organ (SO) transplant, 1081 (8.2%) had SO neoplasia, 332 (2.5%) had hematologic neoplasia, and 570 (4.3%), 183 (1.4%) and 394 (3.0%) were receiving systemic steroids, biological treatments, and immunosuppressors, respectively. Compared to non-IS patients, the aOR (95% CI) for in-hospital death was 1.60 (1.43–1.79) for all IS patients, 1.39 (1.18–1.63) for patients with SO cancer, 2.31 (1.76–3.03) for patients with haematological cancer and 3.12 (2.23–4.36) for patients with SO transplant. The aOR (95% CI) for death for patients who were receiving systemic steroids, biological treatments and immunosuppressors compared to non-IS patients were 2.16 (1.80–2.61), 1.97 (1.33–2.91) and 2.06 (1.64–2.60), respectively. IS patients had a higher odds than non-IS patients of in-hospital acute respiratory distress syndrome, heart failure, myocarditis, thromboembolic disease and multiorgan failure. Conclusions IS patients hospitalized with COVID-19 have a higher odds of in-hospital complications and death compared to non-IS patients.

This is a PDF file of an article that has undergone enhancements after acceptance, such as the addition of a cover page and metadata, and formatting for readability, but it is not yet the definitive version of record. This version will undergo additional copyediting, typesetting and review before it is published in its final form, but we are providing this version to give early visibility of the article. Please note that, during the production process, errors may be discovered which could affect the content, and all legal disclaimers that apply to the journal pertain.