Background:Radiologic data remains the gold standard for the diagnosis of pneumothorax (PTX). The use of ultrasonography (US) has recently emerged as the method of choice with physicians who can perform bedside US.Purpose:To compare the diagnostic accuracy of lung US against bedside chest radiography (CR) for the detection of PTX using thoracic computed tomography (CT) as the gold standard.Materials and Methods:We conducted a prospective, single-blind study on 192 critically ill patients; each patient received lung US examination, bedside CR, followed by thoracic CT scan searching for PTX.Results:Of the studied patients, CT of the chest confirmed the diagnosis of PTX in 36 (18.75%) patients of which 31 were diagnosed by thoracic US while CR detected only 19 cases. Overall lung US showed a considerable higher sensitivity than bedside CR (86.1% vs. 52.7%), lung US also showed higher, negative predictive values, and diagnostic accuracy against CR (96.8% vs. 90.1%), and (95.3% vs. 90.6%), respectively. CR had a slightly higher specificity than lung US (99.4% vs. 97.4%), and higher positive predictive values (95.0% vs. 88.6%).Conclusion:Lung US is an accurate modality more than anteroposterior bedside CR in comparison with CT scanning when evaluating critically ill mechanically ventilated patients, patients underwent thoracocentesis, central venous catheter insertion, or patients with polytrauma.

Background:Patients’ surgical experiences are influenced by their perception of pain management. Duloxetine (Dulox) and dexamethasone (Dex) are used in multimodal analgesia to reduce opioid use and side effects. Dulox is a selective serotonin and norepinephrine reuptake inhibitor and has efficacy in chronic pain conditions. Dex enhances postoperative (PO) analgesia and reduces PO nausea and vomiting (PONV).Methods:Seventy-five female patients were randomly allocated into one of three equal groups. GI received Dulox 60 mg orally and 100 ml 0.9% sodium chloride (normal saline [NS]) intravenous infusion (IVI) over 15 min, GII: received as GI except Dex 0.1 mg/kg was mixed with NS and GIII received identical placebo for Dulox capsule and Dex IVI, 2 h preoperatively. Patients’ vitals, visual analog scale (VAS), and sedation score were assessed at 30 min, 1 h, 2 h, 6 h, and 12 h postoperatively. Total pethidine requirements, plasma cortisol, PONV, and patients satisfaction were recorded.Results:PO time for 1st rescue analgesic was significantly high in GI and GII compared to GIII and in GII compared to GI. There was a significant less VAS score, heart rate, mean arterial pressure, and a high sedation score in GI and GII compared to GIII at 30 min, 1, 2, and 6 h postoperatively. Total pethidine requirements were significantly less in GI and GII compared to GIII 12 h postoperatively. There was a significant reduction in the 2 h PO serum cortisol (μg/dl) and a significant increase in the PO patients satisfaction score in GI and GII compared to GIII. PONV was decreased significantly in GII compared to GI and GIII.Conclusion:The use of oral Dulox 60 mg combined with Dex 0.1 mg/kg IVI is more effective than oral Dulox 60 mg alone, 2 h preoperatively, for improving PO pain by reducing the requirements for rescue analgesia and PONV.

Introduction. To investigate and compare the effect of the multimodal approach of electrotherapy and myofascial release on pain, range of motion, and functional restriction in patients with chronic mechanical neck pain. Methods. overall, 60 patients of both genders, aged 18-40 years, with chronic mechanical neck pain were diagnosed by an orthopaedist in Shoubra General Hospital, Cairo, Egypt. They were randomly assigned into 3 groups. in group A, 20 patients received multimodal approach of electrotherapy (low level laser therapy, interferential therapy, ultrasound, and non-guideline approach in the form of stretch and strength) 3 times a week for 4 weeks. in group B, 20 patients received myofascial release therapy and non-guideline approach in the form of stretch and strength 3 times a week for 4 weeks. in group C, 20 patients received traditional therapeutic exercises in the form of stretch and strength 3 times a week for 4 weeks. All patients in all groups were evaluated pre-and post-treatment through visual analogue scale, cervical range of motion (CRoM) device, and neck disability index to assess pain, CRoM, and functional restriction. Results. Multiple pairwise comparison tests (post-hoc tests) revealed that there was no significant difference between the effect of multimodal approach of electrotherapy (group A) and myofascial release therapy (group B) on pain intensity level, CRoM, or functional restriction. However, these turned out significantly more effective than traditional therapeutic exercises (group C). Conclusions. Both multimodal approach of electrotherapy and myofascial release therapy are effective in treating patients with chronic mechanical neck pain.

No abstract

Introduction Timely recognition of the return to spontaneous ventilation is essential for reducing costs, morbidity, and mortality. Delays in both removing invasive ventilatory support and excessively early removal are correlated with complications that vary according to the severity of the underlying disease. Several weaning indices and predictors were studied in an attempt to evaluate the outcome of removing ventilatory support. However, none of them have yet presented good results in discriminating the outcome of extubation, even those most used in clinical practices. Aim The aim of this study is to validate the modified integrative weaning index (mIWI) as a reliable weaning index in comparison to the conventional weaning indices in the weaning of critically ill patients from invasive mechanical ventilation. Patients Four hundred patients, above the age of 18 years, on mechanical ventilation for more than 48 hours through an endotracheal tube for any cause were randomly assigned to this study. Methods patients ready to be weaned were assessed using mIWI and conventional indices and monitored for 48 hours. The performance of the indices were assessed in both successful and unsuccessful groups. Results The performance of the mIWI was not significantly superior to the conventional weaning indices in predicting weaning success or failure than the traditional weaning indices. The cut-off value for the predicting successful weaning from mechanical ventilation for the mIWI was higher than suggested by the original study and yet in agreement with some other studies. The cut-off value for the mIWI is higher in patients above the age of 60 years. Conclusion The results of the study revealed that the mIWI is a good predictor of weaning from mechanical ventilation and assessment of pulmonary mechanics and is not significantly superior to the traditional weaning indices, yet is not a good predictor for extubation success.

No abstract

No abstract