No abstract

ABSTRACT:The study describes significant outcomes of the 'Metrology for Meteorology' project, MeteoMet, which is an attempt to bridge the meteorological and metrological communities. The concept of traceability, an idea used in both fields but with a subtle difference in meaning, is at the heart of the project. For meteorology, a traceable measurement is the one that can be traced back to a particular instrument, time and location. From a metrological perspective, traceability further implies that the measurement can be traced back to a primary realization of the quantity being measured in terms of the base units of the International System of Units, the SI. These two perspectives reflect long-standing differences in culture and practice and this project -and this study -represents only the first step towards better communication between the two communities. The 3 year MeteoMet project was funded by the European Metrology Research Program (EMRP) and involved 18 European National Metrological Institutes, 3 universities and 35 collaborating stakeholders including national meteorology organizations, research institutes, universities, associations and instrument companies. The project brought a metrological perspective to several long-standing measurement problems in meteorology and climatology, varying from conventional ground-based measurements to those made in the upper atmosphere. It included development and testing of novel instrumentation as well as improved calibration procedures and facilities, instrument intercomparison under realistic conditions and best practice dissemination. Additionally, the validation of historical temperature data series with respect to measurement uncertainties and a methodology for recalculation of the values were included.

Launched in 2011 within the European Metrology Research Programme (EMRP) of EURAMET, the joint research project "MeteoMet" -Metrology for Meteorology -is the largest EMRP consortium: National Metrology Institutes, Universities, meteorological and climate agencies, Research Institutes, collaborators and manufacturers are working together, developing new metrological techniques, as well as improving already existing ones, for meteorological observations and climate records. The project focuses on: humidity in the upper and surface atmosphere, air temperature, surface and deep-sea temperatures, soil moisture, salinity, permafrost temperature, precipitation and snow albedo effect on air temperature. All tasks are performed under rigorous metrological approach and include design and study of new sensors, new calibration facilities, investigation of sensors characteristics, improved techniques for measurements of Essential Climate Variables with uncertainty evaluation, traceability, laboratory proficiency and inclusion of field influencing parameters, long-lasting measurements, and campaigns in remote and extreme areas. MeteoMet vision is to make a further step towards establishing full data comparability, coherency, consistency and long-term continuity, through a comprehensive evaluation of the measurement uncertainties for the quantities involved in the global climate observing systems and the derived observations. The improvement of quality of Essential Climate Variables records, through the inclusion of measurement uncertainty budgets, will also highlight possible strategies for the reduction of the uncertainty. This contribution presents selected highlights of the MeteoMet project and reviews the main ongoing activities, tasks and deliverables, with a view to its possible future evolution and extended impact.

Slow dissolution of the borosilicate container of triple-point-of-water (TPW) cell is widely recognized as the main cause of long-term drift in observed triple point temperature. We add to the available experimental data a comparison of two large batches of TPW cells (67 cells in total) of various ages (from 1 year to 64 years), manufacturers (NRC, VSL, Fluke, Isotech, etc), and materials (borosilicate glass and fused-silica) which was undertaken in 2018. After measuring the TPW temperatures realized by all 67 cells, 12 borosilicate cells were opened and their water was analyzed by Inductively Coupled Plasma-Mass Spectrometry (ICP-MS) in order to correlate their impurity content with their respective age and their realized TPW temperature. No direct correlation was observed between the TPW cells age/impurity content and their measured triple-point temperature for neither borosilicate cells nor fused silica cells (Pearson’s correlation coefficient rxy is within the range −0.60  ≤  rxy≤ +0.40 for all the pairs considered). For fused-silica cells, the results indicate that after the isotopic variation in the water source is taken into account, the long-term drift due to the dissolution of glass envelope, if any, is negligibly small: (+0.4(±0.6) µK·yr−1 reported herein). Given that all the fused-silica cells realize the TPW temperature within 100 µK of NRC and VSL national reference cells and since the analyzed time period of 15 years is equal to the average lifespan of a TPW cell, we conclude that fused-silica TPW cells are superior to those made from borosilicate glass.

Non-catching type gauges are the emerging class of in situ precipitation measurement instruments. For these instruments, rigorous testing and calibration are more challenging than for traditional gauges. Hydrometeors characteristics like particle size, shape, fall velocity and density must be reproduced in a controlled environment to provide the reference precipitation, instead of the equivalent water flow used for catching-type gauges. They are generally calibrated by the manufacturers using internal procedures developed for the specific technology employed. No agreed methodology exists, and the adopted procedures are rarely traceable to internationally recognized standards. The EURAMET project 18NRM03 'INCIPIT' on 'Calibration and accuracy of non-catching instruments to measure liquid/solid atmospheric precipitation', funded by the European Metrology Programme for Innovation and Research (EMPIR), was initiated in 2019 to investigate calibration and accuracy issues of non-catching measuring instruments used for liquid/solid atmospheric precipitation measurement. A survey of the existing models of non-catching type instruments was initially performed and this paper provides an overview and a description of their working principles and the adopted calibration procedures. Both literature works and technical manuals disclosed by manufacturers are summarized and discussed, while current limitations and metrological requirements are identified.