Infiltration of the airways by T helper type 2 (Th2) lymphocytes is a well-recognized feature of bronchial asthma. Monocyte-derived chemokine (MDC) is a potent attractant which activates Th2 lymphocytes via the chemokine receptor CCR4. We have investigated both leukocyte recruitment and MDC release into the airways of asthmatic patients. Differential cell counts in bronchoalveolar lavage (BAL) fluid showed that numbers of lymphocytes and eosinophils were elevated in asthmatics compared with normal subjects (median, 6.1 vs. 1.0 x 10(3)/ml, P < 0.005 and 1.4 vs. 0.24 x 10(3)/ml, P = 0.001, respectively). By enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay it was demonstrated that MDC concentrations were significantly elevated in BAL fluid from asthmatics compared with normals (medians 282 pg/ml, range 190-780 pg/ml vs. median 29 pg/ml range 17-82 pg/ml, P < 0.001). Interestingly, there was a significant correlation between MDC levels and the bronchoconstrictive response to methacholine [PC20 forced expiratory volume (FEV)1, r = -0.78, P = 0.001], suggesting that MDC may be involved in the severity of the disease. By immunohistochemistry, MDC was localized predominantly to the bronchial epithelium in bronchial biopsies derived from stable asthmatics. Moreover, primary human airway epithelial cells were found to release MDC upon cytokine stimulation. These findings suggest that MDC may play a major role in the pathogenesis of bronchial asthma.
Introduction. Lung cancer is the most common malignancy in the world including Mexico [1, 2]. Smoking is the main risk factor for the development of different types of lung cancer, about 70–80% of lung cancer cases are associated with smoking and approximately 50% of new cancer cases are diagnosed in ex-smokers. Current therapies rarely cure the disease, and the high relapse rate with the delay in diagnosis results in a poor prognosis and overall survival rates of 10% [1]. Several ion channels are over-expressed in cancer including Kv1.3, K2p9.1, Kv10.1 (Eag1) and Kv11.1 (HERG) channels. These channels are expressed in different cell types and tumor tissues and have been shown to increase cell proliferation. Eag1 is expressed aberrantly with a high frequency (75%) in tumor cells of different histological origins including sarcomas, carcinomas of the breast, colon, and cervix. Eag1 inhibition by either astemizole, imipramine, or Eag1 specific monoclonal antibodies reduces tumor cell proliferation in vitro and in vivo [3, 4, 5]. Eag1 channels are over-expressed in lung cancer [6]. However, a detailed study of Eag1 expression in the different types of lung cancer is missing. Materials and Methods: Lung biopsies: 44 Lung biopsies were obtained from patients attending the Instituto Nacional de Enfermedades Respiratorias (National Institute for Respiratory Diseases) in Mexico City following local ethical considerations. Patients had no prior treatment (chemotherapy or radiotherapy). 37 biopsies were classified as lung cancer samples and included adenocarcinoma, epidermoid, small cell, adenosquamous and neuroendocrine tumors. 5 samples were diagnosed as inflammatory disease and 2 were form patients with thyroid carcinoma. RNA extraction was performed with TRIzol (Life Technologies, Invitrogene) according to the manufacturer's recommendation. cDNA was synthesized by reverse transcription under the manufacturer's recommendations (New England BioLabs). Eag1 gene expression was assessed by real-time PCR under the manufacturer's recommendations (Fermentas SYBR Green/ROX qPCR Master Mix). Eag1 expression in lung biopsies was compared to Eag1 basal expression in fibroblasts from normal lung (WI-38) which was given the value of 1. Results: Eag1 expression was found in 81% of the cancer biopsies while 8% of the samples did not showed changes and in 10% of the biopsies Eag1 was found to be under-expressed. Interestingly, Eag1 was over-expressed in 80% of the samples from chronic inflammation while no changes were observed in the samples from thyroid carcinoma. Conclusions: Our results suggest Eag1 as a tumor marker for different types of lung cancer and as a potential early marker of the disease. References: 1. MacKinnon C A et al. British Medical Bulletin. 95: 47–61. 2010. 2. Molina-Alavez A et al. Gaceta mexicana de oncología. 7(5): 169–173. 2008. 3. Pardo A L et al. The journal of membrane biology. 205: 115–124. 2005. 4. Blackiston J D et al. Cell cycle. 8(21): 3527–3536. 2009. 5. Camacho J. Cancer letters. 233: 1–9. 2006. 6. Hemmerlein et al. Molecular cancer. 5(41): 1–13. 2006. Citation Format: {Authors}. {Abstract title} [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the AACR-NCI-EORTC International Conference: Molecular Targets and Cancer Therapeutics; 2011 Nov 12-16; San Francisco, CA. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Mol Cancer Ther 2011;10(11 Suppl):Abstract nr C13.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
hi@scite.ai
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
Copyright © 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.